From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: leitao@debian.org, david@kernel.org
Cc: linmiaohe@huawei.com, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, ljs@kernel.org,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:07:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260428030721.51274-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d365395-051a-436b-9017-352ebc889770@kernel.org>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 05:49:28PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> + switch (type) {
>> + case MF_MSG_KERNEL:
>> + case MF_MSG_UNKNOWN:
>> + return true;
>> + case MF_MSG_KERNEL_HIGH_ORDER:
>> + /*
>> + * Rule out a concurrent buddy allocation: give the
>> + * allocator a moment to finish prep_new_page() and
>> + * re-check. A genuine high-order kernel tail page stays
>> + * unowned; an in-flight allocation will have bumped the
>> + * refcount, attached a mapping, or placed the page on
>> + * an LRU by now.
>> + */
>> + p = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
>> + if (!p)
>> + return true;
>> + /*
>> + * Yield so a concurrent allocator on another CPU can
>> + * finish prep_new_page() and have its writes become
>> + * visible before we resample the page state.
>> + */
>> + cpu_relax();
>> + return page_count(p) == 0 &&
>> + !PageLRU(p) &&
>> + !page_mapped(p) &&
>> + !page_folio(p)->mapping &&
>> + !is_free_buddy_page(p);
>
>I don't get what you are doing here. The right way to check for a tail page is
>not by checking the refcount.
>
>Further, you are not holding a folio reference? If so, calling
>page_mapped/folio_mapped is shaky. On concurrent folio split you can trigger a
>VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO().
>
>
>Maybe folio_snapshot() is what you are looking for, if you are in fact not
>holding a reference?
Right! Maybe we should not try to make this decision in
panic_on_unrecoverable_mf().
By the time we get here, we only know the final MF_MSG_* type. The
real reason why get_hwpoison_page() failed is already lost.
Wonder if it would be better to split that earlier, around
__get_unpoison_page()/get_any_page(). That code still knows why
grabbing the page failed, either an unsupported kernel page or
just a temporary race we cannot really trust :)
Then the later panic logic can be simple: panic for the stable
unsupported kernel page case, and not for the temporary race case.
That would also avoid trying to guess MF_MSG_KERNEL_HIGH_ORDER here:)
Cheers,
Lance
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 12:23 [PATCH v5 0/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-04-24 12:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] mm/memory-failure: report MF_MSG_KERNEL for reserved pages Breno Leitao
2026-04-27 12:33 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-27 14:45 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-27 15:14 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-27 15:57 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-04-27 15:49 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-28 3:07 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2026-04-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] Documentation: document panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure sysctl Breno Leitao
2026-04-24 12:48 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] selftests/mm: regression test for panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure Breno Leitao
2026-04-28 2:22 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-04-24 13:19 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-24 14:39 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-24 13:28 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260428030721.51274-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox