From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45FFAFF8867 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8409F6B0088; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:28:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7F1EE6B008A; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:28:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 706A16B008C; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:28:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB6F6B0088 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:28:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89781BA121 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:28:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84710916780.17.4EEAD4D Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CDB40008 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=bI9NqMP9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.16 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1777451308; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=osQ4NADV6DIh8LITJXAJgk3yBZnWfv+NhFe5WokzFpT2iP/kbLbm7eLR3s/nx22CnnvDjx P8VIVEXapLZz7DJY2oSQduKCmqDMQEDi7CByT4vt50k40c5pZYDu1nbDZ6JzznzKSCzmeS i6jm56lXjqDk12wLmIvqL88YYWbllSY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=bI9NqMP9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 192.198.163.16 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1777451308; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=8m+8sVnmaYHkTa9+PFXFunu3jSY1eXSkR2qKEpxhJOs=; b=3U2nKJl3xfyP3/171uDGh/gtbYRvuXjFFHMlec7oE7mde/8K+mnDUPxx50MqFe3NWOUB40 RzElkCby1d2OG2mOxq/4jOeLrxOG4/0HZSExFGZdpiADWnYePL5U6h3xkrY5+kAG0zVrOS xwcR9AAGiKT4sFXMlySXZpnOPHf1SBc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777451308; x=1808987308; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=cOxa4CgWhjet1z2EeEEdLVqhmu6YFrkVnG4ZICWRr0M=; b=bI9NqMP9hWMJ9N2drZ1XYGth0GXh5dtF9A6zro4K3PtrGkMQjHdeanEv PY+6QWgs06a+6Y/gN2hJ4XOQTTCzlMnuX99yE3FKRtIBRpy66DG486lRl wQmDMgtycrtqAVX3cm2A8vlY3E1XrHIEeg0CH/uq6F+K/jp7eKPCz4/rS Ofuka2bO7v43RT+BLjVYfWXhaVB8ohJDPKtigOyt6AqDODg9pcp9twHn7 nuYuaB+ktxvMbrPexZJZ2jrL//c4yQSeiaTtj1sCKYVEqoP5BlcHfI9PQ ty6GHswpOQ19ZLoMn5PRS60OVajYpKQWN+m2D9V0FRAK1PXoiJP9Be2JI w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YX5CQjaQSKqjuu9G9h6iZg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: txKzh3yqTlyVkMZoRGzOMQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11770"; a="65905228" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,205,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="65905228" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2026 01:28:26 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 8mkmh+WgT9iotp82+uPsdQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: XnmKZAYmTgyF33Wn7Sdevg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,205,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="227692057" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO aa799cca880d) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2026 01:28:24 -0700 Received: from kbuild by aa799cca880d with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wI0HM-00000000Ap2-3WbZ; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:28:20 +0000 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 16:27:32 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christian Brauner , Thomas Graf , Herbert Xu , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Lorenzo Stoakes , David Hildenbrand , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+5af806780f38a5fe691f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [PATCH] rhashtable: give each instance its own lockdep class Message-ID: <202604291646.noNYgx5i-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260427-work-rhashtable-lockdep-v1-1-f69e8bd91cb2@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260427-work-rhashtable-lockdep-v1-1-f69e8bd91cb2@kernel.org> X-Stat-Signature: ip9osax3i73hhsmka6pd7rordo6zf9cs X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D3CDB40008 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-HE-Tag: 1777451307-428983 X-HE-Meta: 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 GF1N67US iErEOWsSuJ8p/wb8E3sjT4OzddFaLugiobDRWmiWXpD96b+VAH7nC5yYc1WUfAlvfH03H3f2Bn5ZHt0n4pemkCMWkB4Ekq5jKZSghBhU4V1ldho/3xJHaJB6HSwoGhCGzkVu0FlxBEYR+UiKb4ghfW5paIWB0BJmjnCx+yfNJmpVe6PcJJwcW88LU3FWgmQW44KGdbHm4Vgy0ADh0DuSIQO14mXNzEF7PtpUWTmEfw5x/w+OXVe9amGoHFNyPVxe3WM9efyH73qZDxPfmQ3ey2hyb02I5etYAyWJUQ20mrScO+Fo+uRf9gXi+Tmd5DqOupIHj+06XXt8baiD1ZIRf3Aq8Eg72m1rv3ezRyaRrLot8dzNRNOvoRAhleBnUh7EC6oiiH21oIv7Po+GDzAKyMnXKar7FCez/iDr83XZ3ck42A24= Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Christian, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 6596a02b207886e9e00bb0161c7fd59fea53c081] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Brauner/rhashtable-give-each-instance-its-own-lockdep-class/20260428-182539 base: 6596a02b207886e9e00bb0161c7fd59fea53c081 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260427-work-rhashtable-lockdep-v1-1-f69e8bd91cb2%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH] rhashtable: give each instance its own lockdep class config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260429/202604291646.noNYgx5i-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260429/202604291646.noNYgx5i-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604291646.noNYgx5i-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1030 function parameter 'key' not described in '__rhashtable_init' >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1030 expecting prototype for rhashtable_init(). Prototype was for __rhashtable_init() instead >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1104 function parameter 'key' not described in '__rhltable_init' >> Warning: lib/rhashtable.c:1104 expecting prototype for rhltable_init(). Prototype was for __rhltable_init() instead -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki