Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: huge_memory: refactor thpsize_shmem_enabled_store() with sysfs_match_string()

[ranxiaokai627@163.com]

>The subject line should be: "mm: shmem: xxx"

Yes, of course.
Thanks for your review.

>On 5/13/26 5:45 PM, ranxiaokai627@163.com wrote:
>> From: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
>> 
>> Inspired by commit 82d9ff648c6c ("mm: huge_memory: refactor
>> anon_enabled_store() with set_anon_enabled_mode()"), refactor
>> thpsize_shmem_enabled_store() using sysfs_match_string().
>> This eliminates the duplicated spin_lock/unlock(), set/clear_bit(),
>> calls across all branches, reducing code duplication.
>> 
>> Tested with selftests ./run_kselftest.sh -t mm:ksft_thp.sh,
>> all test cases passed.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
>> ---
>
>You should document your changes under the '---' for the new version, or 
>ideally, include a cover letter describing them.

Thanks for the reminder!
Will do in the next version.

>I did some togging and works well (some nits as below). Feel free to add:
>Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>
>>   mm/shmem.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
>> index 3b5dc21b323c..60cb10854f11 100644
>> --- a/mm/shmem.c
>> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
>> @@ -5526,6 +5526,29 @@ static ssize_t shmem_enabled_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>>   struct kobj_attribute shmem_enabled_attr = __ATTR_RW(shmem_enabled);
>>   static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(huge_shmem_orders_lock);
>>   
>> +enum huge_shmem_enabled_mode {
>> +	HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ALWAYS = 0,
>> +	HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_INHERIT,
>> +	HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_WITHIN_SIZE,
>> +	HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ADVISE,
>> +	HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_NEVER,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const char * const huge_shmem_enabled_mode_strings[] = {
>> +	[HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ALWAYS]      = "always",
>> +	[HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_INHERIT]     = "inherit",
>> +	[HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_WITHIN_SIZE] = "within_size",
>> +	[HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ADVISE]      = "advise",
>> +	[HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_NEVER]       = "never",
>> +};
>> +
>> +static unsigned long * const huge_shmem_orders_by_mode[] = {
>> +	[HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ALWAYS]      = &huge_shmem_orders_always,
>> +	[HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_INHERIT]     = &huge_shmem_orders_inherit,
>> +	[HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_WITHIN_SIZE] = &huge_shmem_orders_within_size,
>> +	[HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_ADVISE]      = &huge_shmem_orders_madvise,
>> +};
>> +
>>   static ssize_t thpsize_shmem_enabled_show(struct kobject *kobj,
>>   					  struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>>   {
>> @@ -5551,57 +5574,42 @@ static ssize_t thpsize_shmem_enabled_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>>   					   const char *buf, size_t count)
>>   {
>>   	int order = to_thpsize(kobj)->order;
>> +	int mode, m;
>>   	ssize_t ret = count;
>> +	int err;
>> +	bool changed = false;
>> +	/* Do not override huge allocation policy with non-PMD sized mTHP */
>> +	if (mode == HUGE_SHMEM_ENABLED_INHERIT &&
>> +		shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_FORCE && !is_pmd_order(order))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>   
>> -	if (ret > 0) {
>> -		int err = start_stop_khugepaged();
>> +	spin_lock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
>> +	for (m = 0; m < ARRAY_SIZE(huge_shmem_orders_by_mode); m++) {
>> +		if (m == mode)
>> +			changed |= !__test_and_set_bit(order, huge_shmem_orders_by_mode[m]);
>> +		else
>> +			changed |= __test_and_clear_bit(order, huge_shmem_orders_by_mode[m]);
>> +	}
>> +	spin_unlock(&huge_shmem_orders_lock);
>>   
>> +	if (changed) {
>> +		err = start_stop_khugepaged();
>>   		if (err)
>>   			ret = err;
>
>Nit: just return err.
>
>> +	} else {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Recalculate watermarks even when the mode hasn't changed
>> +		 * to preserve the legacy behavior, as this is always called
>> +		 * inside start_stop_khugepaged().
>> +		 */
>> +		set_recommended_min_free_kbytes();
>>   	}
>> +
>>   	return ret;
>
>Nit: return count, then you can remove the 'ret' variable.

Agreed.
I'll wait for more feedback and send a new version.