From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Vineet Agarwal <agarwal.vineet2006@gmail.com>,
david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: check file initialization writes in split_huge_page_test
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 02:51:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260519025141.lguv7mrtvqgqpltc@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518163553.447a45c54a3d419b9bb916ca@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 04:35:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Fri, 15 May 2026 09:22:11 +0000 Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 01:19:24PM +0530, Vineet Agarwal wrote:
>> >create_pagecache_thp_and_fd() fills the backing file for the
>> >pagecache THP tests using repeated write() calls, but the return
>> >value is never checked.
>> >
>> >If a write fails or completes only partially, the test may continue
>> >with an incompletely initialized file and produce misleading results.
>> >
>> >Check the result of write() and fail the test if the expected number
>> >of bytes was not written.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Vineet Agarwal <agarwal.vineet2006@gmail.com>
>> >---
>> > tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>> >index 500d07c4938b..eab69b0f59a0 100644
>> >--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>> >+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>> >@@ -609,9 +609,16 @@ static int create_pagecache_thp_and_fd(const char *testfile, size_t fd_size,
>> > assert(fd_size % sizeof(buf) == 0);
>> > for (i = 0; i < sizeof(buf); i++)
>> > buf[i] = (unsigned char)i;
>> >- for (i = 0; i < fd_size; i += sizeof(buf))
>> >- write(*fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
>> >-
>> >+ for (i = 0; i < fd_size; i += sizeof(buf)) {
>> >+ ssize_t written;
>> >+
>> >+ written = write(*fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
>> >+ if (written != sizeof(buf)) {
>> >+ ksft_perror("write testfile");
>> >+ close(*fd);
>> >+ goto err_out_unlink;
>>
>> Maybe we can "goto err_out_close" and remove the close() here?
>
>AI review suggested the same:
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260512074924.27721-1-agarwal.vineet2006%40gmail.com
>
>And it complained about the handling of short writes in the added code.
>
>> Apart from this, I found on error writing to /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches in below,
>> it just goto err_out_unlink, which left fd open.
>
>Not understanding - cab you please describe more completely?
>
I mean do this below.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
index 460fa1f606fd..f30402ece608 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static int create_pagecache_thp_and_fd(const char *testfile, size_t fd_size,
}
if (write(*fd, "3", 1) != 1) {
ksft_perror("write to drop_caches");
- goto err_out_unlink;
+ goto err_out_close;
}
close(*fd);
On error writing this fd, /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches, we forget to close it.
>> How about fix that at the same time.
>>
>> Generally, the change look good.
>>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 7:49 [PATCH] selftests/mm: check file initialization writes in split_huge_page_test Vineet Agarwal
2026-05-12 7:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-15 9:22 ` Wei Yang
2026-05-18 23:35 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-19 2:51 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2026-05-19 19:18 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-20 1:49 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260519025141.lguv7mrtvqgqpltc@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=agarwal.vineet2006@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox