Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, david@kernel.org,
	willy@infradead.org, surenb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	ljs@kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com, usama.arif@linux.dev,
	fvdl@google.com, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 19/40] mm: page_alloc: aggressively pack non-movable allocs in tainted SPBs on large systems
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 10:59:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520150018.2491267-20-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520150018.2491267-1-riel@surriel.com>

On systems with many superpageblocks, sub-pageblock MOVABLE fragments
within already-tainted SPBs were being skipped by __rmqueue_claim()
due to the ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT pageblock_order floor. This caused the
allocator to fall through to clean SPBs, tainting them unnecessarily.

Introduce SPB_AGGRESSIVE_THRESHOLD: on systems with more than 8
superpageblocks, relax the min_order floor for the preferred category
(tainted SPBs) so non-movable allocations consume free space there at
any granularity. On small systems, preserve the pageblock_order floor
to protect MOVABLE capacity within tainted SPBs.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7 syzkaller
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 6884f638a97c..63151e99bd53 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2659,6 +2659,24 @@ static void prep_new_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_flags
  */
 #define SPB_TAINTED_RESERVE	4
 
+/*
+ * On systems with many superpageblocks, we can afford to "write off"
+ * tainted superpageblocks by aggressively packing unmovable/reclaimable
+ * allocations into them -- even sub-pageblock fragments -- to keep clean
+ * superpageblocks clean for future 1GB hugepage and contiguous allocations.
+ *
+ * On small systems (few superpageblocks), each SPB represents a large
+ * fraction of total memory. Aggressively claiming sub-pageblock movable
+ * fragments from tainted SPBs would destroy MOVABLE capacity that the
+ * system can't afford to lose, with little benefit since there are too
+ * few SPBs to meaningfully separate movable from unmovable anyway.
+ *
+ * This threshold controls the crossover: above it, prefer concentrating
+ * non-movable allocations in tainted SPBs at any granularity; below it,
+ * only claim whole free pageblocks from tainted SPBs.
+ */
+#define SPB_AGGRESSIVE_THRESHOLD	8
+
 /**
  * sb_preferred_for_movable - Find the fullest clean superpageblock for movable
  * @zone: zone to search
@@ -3585,6 +3603,7 @@ __rmqueue_claim(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype,
 {
 	int current_order;
 	int min_order = order;
+	int nofrag_min_order = order;
 	struct page *page;
 	int fallback_mt;
 	static const unsigned int cat_search[] = {
@@ -3598,9 +3617,18 @@ __rmqueue_claim(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype,
 	 * Do not steal pages from freelists belonging to other pageblocks
 	 * i.e. orders < pageblock_order. If there are no local zones free,
 	 * the zonelists will be reiterated without ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT.
+	 *
+	 * Only apply this restriction to empty and clean superpageblocks.
+	 * Claiming within already-tainted superpageblocks does not cause
+	 * new fragmentation, and skipping them wastes free space that
+	 * could prevent tainting clean superpageblocks.
+	 *
+	 * When ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT is set, skip empty and clean superpageblocks
+	 * entirely to avoid tainting them. The slowpath will try reclaim and
+	 * compaction first, and only drop ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT as a last resort.
 	 */
 	if (order < pageblock_order && alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT)
-		min_order = pageblock_order;
+		nofrag_min_order = pageblock_order;
 
 	/*
 	 * Find the largest available free page in a fallback migratetype.
@@ -3610,6 +3638,31 @@ __rmqueue_claim(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype,
 	 * ones.
 	 */
 	for (c = 0; c < ARRAY_SIZE(cat_search); c++) {
+		/*
+		 * When avoiding fragmentation, do not search clean/empty
+		 * superpageblocks for fallback pages. Tainting a clean SPB
+		 * is the worst outcome -- better to fail and let the slowpath
+		 * try reclaim and compaction in already-tainted SPBs first.
+		 */
+		if ((alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT) &&
+		    cat_search[c] != SB_SEARCH_PREFERRED)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * For the preferred category (tainted SPBs for non-movable),
+		 * search all orders down to the allocation order on systems
+		 * with enough superpageblocks that we can afford to write off
+		 * tainted ones. These SPBs are already tainted, so sub-pageblock
+		 * stealing doesn't cause additional fragmentation.
+		 *
+		 * On small systems, keep the pageblock_order floor to preserve
+		 * MOVABLE capacity within tainted SPBs -- see comment at
+		 * SPB_AGGRESSIVE_THRESHOLD.
+		 */
+		min_order = (cat_search[c] == SB_SEARCH_PREFERRED &&
+			     zone->nr_superpageblocks > SPB_AGGRESSIVE_THRESHOLD) ?
+			    order : nofrag_min_order;
+
 		for (current_order = MAX_PAGE_ORDER;
 		     current_order >= min_order; --current_order) {
 			if (!should_try_claim_block(current_order,
@@ -3881,8 +3934,18 @@ static bool rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
 	 * For movable allocations, prefer pageblocks from the
 	 * fullest clean superpageblock to pack allocations and
 	 * preserve empty superpageblocks for 1GB hugepages.
+	 *
+	 * For non-movable allocations, force ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT so
+	 * __rmqueue cannot steal a whole pageblock out of a clean
+	 * SPB. Stealing is the worst possible outcome for a bulk
+	 * refill: a single network or slab burst can taint dozens
+	 * of clean pageblocks. Phase 2 will adopt sub-pageblock
+	 * fragments from tainted SPBs before Phase 3 falls back to
+	 * the original alloc_flags (which may eventually steal at
+	 * the requested order, a much smaller fragmentation event).
 	 */
 	while (refilled + pageblock_nr_pages <= pages_needed) {
+		unsigned int p1_alloc_flags = alloc_flags;
 		struct page *page = NULL;
 
 		if (migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) {
@@ -3892,11 +3955,14 @@ static bool rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
 			if (sb)
 				page = __rmqueue_from_sb(zone, pageblock_order,
 							 migratetype, sb);
+		} else if (!is_migrate_cma(migratetype)) {
+			p1_alloc_flags = (p1_alloc_flags | ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT) &
+					 ~ALLOC_NOFRAG_TAINTED_OK;
 		}
 		if (!page)
 			page = __rmqueue(zone, pageblock_order,
 					 migratetype,
-					 alloc_flags, &rmqm);
+					 p1_alloc_flags, &rmqm);
 		if (!page)
 			break;
 
-- 
2.54.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-20 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-20 14:59 [RFC PATCH 00/40] mm: reliable 1GB page allocation Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 01/40] mm: page_alloc: replace pageblock_flags bitmap with struct pageblock_data Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 02/40] mm: page_alloc: per-cpu pageblock buddy allocator Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 03/40] mm: page_alloc: split-path PCP free with local-trylock + remote-llist Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 04/40] mm: mm_init: fix zone assignment for pages in unavailable ranges Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 05/40] mm: page_alloc: remove watermark boost mechanism Rik van Riel
2026-05-26 14:02   ` Usama Arif
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 06/40] mm: page_alloc: async evacuation of stolen movable pageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 07/40] mm: page_alloc: track actual page contents in pageblock flags Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 08/40] mm: page_alloc: superpageblock metadata for 1GB anti-fragmentation Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 09/40] mm: page_alloc: support superpageblock resize for memory hotplug Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 10/40] mm: page_alloc: add superpageblock fullness lists for allocation steering Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 11/40] mm: page_alloc: steer pageblock stealing to tainted superpageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 12/40] mm: page_alloc: steer movable allocations to fullest clean superpageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 13/40] mm: page_alloc: extract claim_whole_block from try_to_claim_block Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 14/40] mm: page_alloc: add per-superpageblock free lists Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 15/40] mm: page_alloc: add background superpageblock defragmentation worker Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 16/40] mm: compaction: walk per-superpageblock free lists for migration targets Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 17/40] mm: page_alloc: superpageblock-aware contiguous and higher order allocation Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 18/40] mm: page_alloc: prevent atomic allocations from tainting clean SPBs Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 20/40] mm: page_alloc: prefer reclaim over tainting clean superpageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 21/40] mm: page_alloc: adopt partial pageblocks from tainted superpageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 22/40] mm: page_alloc: add CONFIG_DEBUG_VM sanity checks for SPB counters Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 23/40] mm: page_alloc: targeted evacuation and dynamic reserves for tainted SPBs Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 24/40] mm: page_alloc: prevent UNMOVABLE/RECLAIMABLE mixing in pageblocks Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 25/40] mm: trigger deferred SPB evac when atomic allocs would taint a clean SPB Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 26/40] mm: page_alloc: refuse fragmenting fallback for callers with cheap fallback Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 27/40] mm: page_alloc: cross-migratetype buddy borrow within tainted SPBs Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 28/40] mm: page_alloc: drive slab shrink from SPB anti-fragmentation pressure Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 29/40] mm: page_reporting: walk per-superpageblock free lists Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 30/40] mm: show_mem: collect migratetype letters from per-superpageblock lists Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 31/40] mm: page_alloc: per-(zone, order, mt) PASS_1 hint cache Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 32/40] mm: debug: prevent infinite recursion in dump_page() with CMA Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 33/40] PM: hibernate: walk per-superpageblock free lists in mark_free_pages Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 18:19   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 34/40] btrfs: allocate eb-attached btree pages as movable Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 17:47   ` Boris Burkov
2026-05-23 15:58     ` David Sterba
2026-05-24  1:43       ` Rik van Riel
2026-05-24 19:59         ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-05-25  6:57           ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 35/40] mm: page_alloc: refuse best-effort high-order allocs servable at lower orders Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 36/40] mm: page_alloc: set ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT on alloc_frozen_pages_nolock_noprof Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 37/40] mm: page_alloc: move spb_get_category and spb_tainted_reserve to mmzone.h Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 38/40] mm: compaction: skip empty tainted superpageblocks as migration source Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 39/40] mm: compaction: respect tainted SPB reserve in destination selection Rik van Riel
2026-05-20 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH 40/40] mm: page_alloc: SPB tracepoint instrumentation [DO-NOT-MERGE] Rik van Riel
2026-05-21  7:39 ` [syzbot ci] Re: mm: reliable 1GB page allocation syzbot ci
2026-05-22 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH 00/40] " Usama Arif
2026-05-22 13:55   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260520150018.2491267-20-riel@surriel.com \
    --to=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox