From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
chrisl@kernel.org, kasong@tencent.com, hughd@google.com,
liam@infradead.org
Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
riel@surriel.com, vbabka@kernel.org, harry@kernel.org,
jannh@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
baohua@kernel.org, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com,
weixugc@google.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, nphamcs@gmail.com,
bhe@redhat.com, youngjun.park@lge.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, pfalcato@suse.de,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/12] Optimize anonymous large folio unmapping
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 12:06:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526063635.61721-1-dev.jain@arm.com> (raw)
Speed up unmapping of anonymous large folios by clearing the ptes, and
setting swap ptes, in one go.
The following benchmark (stolen from Barry at [1]) is used to measure the
time taken to swapout 256M worth of memory backed by 64K large folios:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#define SIZE_MB 256
#define SIZE_BYTES (SIZE_MB * 1024 * 1024)
int main() {
void *addr = mmap(NULL, SIZE_BYTES, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
if (addr == MAP_FAILED) {
perror("mmap failed");
return 1;
}
memset(addr, 0, SIZE_BYTES);
struct timespec start, end;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &start);
if (madvise(addr, SIZE_BYTES, MADV_PAGEOUT) != 0) {
perror("madvise(MADV_PAGEOUT) failed");
munmap(addr, SIZE_BYTES);
return 1;
}
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &end);
long duration_ns = (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) * 1e9 +
(end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec);
printf("madvise(MADV_PAGEOUT) took %ld ns (%.3f ms)\n",
duration_ns, duration_ns / 1e6);
munmap(addr, SIZE_BYTES);
return 0;
}
Performance as measured on a Linux VM on Apple M3 (arm64):
Vanilla - Mean: 37401913 ns, std dev: 12%
Patched - Mean: 17420282 ns, std dev: 11%
No regression observed on 4K folios.
Performance as measured on bare metal x86:
Vanilla - mean: 54986286 ns, std dev: 1.5%
Patched - mean: 51930795 ns, std dev: 3%
Interestingly, no obvious improvement is observed on x86, hinting that the
benefit lies mainly in the reduction of ptep_get() calls and the reduction
of TLB flushes during contpte-unfolding, on arm64.
No regression is observed on 4K folios on x86 too.
---
Applies on mm-unstable (444fc9435e57).
v3->v4:
- Add patch 1 (page->folio conversion), patch 2 (add try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one),
patch 6 and 11 (subpage -> page renaming), and patch 10 (refactoring anon
unmap first)
- Drop patch 1 of v3, which is now in mm-hotfixes
- Patch 3: do set_ptes() restoration at call site
- Patch 4: rename the function, move to memory.c, rename pte->ptep, pteval->pte
- Patch 7,8: Remove redundant stub, add kerneldoc
- Patch 9: remove helper, do a loop in-line
v2->v3:
Mostly a resend after merge window. Some minor changes:
- Match kerneldoc parameter with function parameter (pte -> ptep)
- Mention change BUG->WARN in patch description
- Rename walk_done -> exit_walk in patch 2
-
v1->v2:
- Keep nr_pages as unsigned long
- Add patch 2
- Rename some functions, make return type bool for functions returning 0/1
- Drop page_vma_mapped_walk_jump - this is implicitly handled
- Drop likely()
- Add folio_dup/put_swap_pages, do subpage -> page
- Shorten the kerneldoc to remove unnecessary information - keep it
aligned with analogous functions
- Put clear_pages_anon_exclusive to mm.h
- Some more refactoring in last patch with finish_folio_unmap
Dev Jain (12):
mm/rmap: convert page -> folio for hwpoison checks
mm/rmap: Add try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one
mm/rmap: refactor some code around lazyfree folio unmapping
mm/memory: Batch set uffd-wp markers during zapping
mm/rmap: batch unmap folios belonging to uffd-wp VMAs
mm/swap: rename subpage->page in folio_dup_swap/folio_put_swap
mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_dup_swap
mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_put_swap
mm/rmap: Add batched version of folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte
mm/rmap: refactor anon folio unmap in try_to_unmap_one
mm/mprotect: drop 'sub' from page_anon_exclusive_sub_batch
mm/rmap: enable batch unmapping of anonymous folios
include/linux/mm.h | 4 +
include/linux/mm_inline.h | 53 -----
include/linux/rmap.h | 52 +++--
mm/internal.h | 17 ++
mm/memory.c | 87 +++++--
mm/mprotect.c | 19 +-
mm/rmap.c | 475 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
mm/shmem.c | 8 +-
mm/swap.h | 36 ++-
mm/swapfile.c | 31 ++-
10 files changed, 470 insertions(+), 312 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 6:36 Dev Jain [this message]
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] mm/rmap: convert page -> folio for hwpoison checks Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] mm/rmap: Add try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] mm/rmap: refactor some code around lazyfree folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] mm/memory: Batch set uffd-wp markers during zapping Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] mm/rmap: batch unmap folios belonging to uffd-wp VMAs Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] mm/swap: rename subpage->page in folio_dup_swap/folio_put_swap Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_dup_swap Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] mm/swapfile: Add batched version of folio_put_swap Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] mm/rmap: Add batched version of folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pte Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] mm/rmap: refactor anon folio unmap in try_to_unmap_one Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] mm/mprotect: drop 'sub' from page_anon_exclusive_sub_batch Dev Jain
2026-05-26 6:36 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] mm/rmap: enable batch unmapping of anonymous folios Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260526063635.61721-1-dev.jain@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox