Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
To: vbabka@kernel.org, harry@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: cl@gentwo.org, rientjes@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/slub: detach and reattach partial slabs in batch
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 17:52:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260528095254.43721-2-hao.li@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528095254.43721-1-hao.li@linux.dev>

get_partial_node_bulk() moves each selected slab from the node's
partial list to the local pc->slabs list using a remove_partial() and
list_add() pair. In practice, the loop often detaches several adjacent
slabs. Doing this individually repeatedly manipulates list pointers
while holding n->list_lock, which causes unnecessary churn.

To demonstrate this, the counts below show how often single vs. multiple
consecutive slabs are retrieved during a will-it-scale mmap stress test:

consecutive_slabs_count        frequency
= 1                            277345324
= 2                            335238023
= 3                            175717884
>= 4                           88862337

The data confirms that retrieving multiple contiguous slabs is highly
frequent.

To optimize this, track contiguous runs of matching slabs and move each
run in a single operation using list_bulk_move_tail(). This reduces list
pointer churn inside the lock critical section.

Apply the same optimization to __refill_objects_node() when reattaching
leftover partial slabs back to the node's partial list.

The will-it-scale mmap benchmark shows a 2% ~ 5% performance improvement
after applying this patch.

Signed-off-by: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
---
 mm/slub.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index b9f10b869914..eb60b3da23ff 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3739,6 +3739,7 @@ static bool get_partial_node_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s,
 				  bool allow_spin)
 {
 	struct slab *slab, *slab2;
+	struct slab *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
 	unsigned int total_free = 0;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -3757,8 +3758,15 @@ static bool get_partial_node_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s,
 		struct freelist_counters flc;
 		unsigned int slab_free;
 
-		if (!pfmemalloc_match(slab, pc->flags))
+		if (!pfmemalloc_match(slab, pc->flags)) {
+			if (first) {
+				list_bulk_move_tail(&pc->slabs,
+						    &first->slab_list,
+						    &last->slab_list);
+				first = NULL;
+			}
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * determine the number of free objects in the slab racily
@@ -3775,15 +3783,21 @@ static bool get_partial_node_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s,
 		    && total_free + slab_free > pc->max_objects)
 			break;
 
-		remove_partial(n, slab);
-
-		list_add(&slab->slab_list, &pc->slabs);
+		if (!first)
+			first = slab;
+		last = slab;
+		slab_clear_node_partial(slab);
+		n->nr_partial--;
 
 		total_free += slab_free;
 		if (total_free >= pc->max_objects)
 			break;
 	}
 
+	if (first)
+		list_bulk_move_tail(&pc->slabs, &first->slab_list,
+				    &last->slab_list);
+
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
 	return total_free > 0;
 }
@@ -7194,12 +7208,13 @@ __refill_objects_node(struct kmem_cache *s, void **p, gfp_t gfp, unsigned int mi
 	if (!list_empty(&pc.slabs)) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
 
-		list_for_each_entry_safe(slab, slab2, &pc.slabs, slab_list) {
-
-			list_del(&slab->slab_list);
-			add_partial(n, slab, ADD_TO_TAIL);
+		list_for_each_entry(slab, &pc.slabs, slab_list) {
+			slab_set_node_partial(slab);
+			n->nr_partial++;
 		}
 
+		list_splice_tail(&pc.slabs, &n->partial);
+
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
 	}
 
-- 
2.54.0



  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28  9:52 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/slub: batch partial slab list operations Hao Li
2026-05-28  9:52 ` Hao Li [this message]
2026-05-28  9:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/slub: introduce helper to decrement partial slab count and clear flag Hao Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260528095254.43721-2-hao.li@linux.dev \
    --to=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox