From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CCD0CD6E45 for ; Fri, 29 May 2026 08:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A7A226B008A; Fri, 29 May 2026 04:48:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A2B746B008C; Fri, 29 May 2026 04:48:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 968D36B0092; Fri, 29 May 2026 04:48:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872B86B008A for ; Fri, 29 May 2026 04:48:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2CD1A0F87 for ; Fri, 29 May 2026 08:48:08 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84819830256.16.B86E3B3 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309B7A0009 for ; Fri, 29 May 2026 08:48:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=fHUb1N4h; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1780044486; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=2Wya9UPIcmPAPl5XVBvF2WHQdh2/f2rYVl+3awRgb3I=; b=NX88rd6zPXU0ZtzpsaozvkzlAKabVz9qb5NcAT+Dc1w5DaYr2vgO4v1pGHZMIkJQIKqyTQ BD9O+ga5gcYl10ZdnP/pBpGgVLsY4UxZwtWqXQ5C2CmmRiLp8ATXZ5n6utEkMjNHsEiSY9 FBTc1+smXSMwjXN+gWeXwzVTOqoylr0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=fHUb1N4h; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com designates 198.175.65.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1780044486; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=OS9gYfyMEi4vlZh3YDP0mxqlLPGKA0ni8waFO2YuNpqbx3IzvYSp4y3M0inDbWt8ajov2/ eBBrJJG2XnjdOjNKJlU0UMM8+Vq3Si9S2rRD1xXPWmlK5mBPpoHnKNhtMXISFjZKdlJwQJ 6gg3G0s14D3fp5dneKE2mKf9gPkaTaQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1780044486; x=1811580486; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=6AWLmlUtfnCHN56YA869w6PKgs0+gUIV71eS29nK1aI=; b=fHUb1N4hLJG75g8Id3oNwrUcbt76RuNef/ZA/0ZaFMCOsWwzAE8NRPkn y+dTWkWjWIfVOobGLJLUwJoXvJ5+3GZexDYG4yffBVziRmQPo7rUDHBk4 GA1Ye90Na/sLgf1Dry9HKDWlu87k6CECF99KXSYGk2DfKLx5EjwjdEbMQ A9aPx+m19t4tBaopTr0LzW1+0E9QPhrSlVAuAUD7Lyco64TG+cQgxrJJS rIr77ytauGiV+s5VXt445JtQuZ6C69ynqM5iuezV+/+Ku80TpQ4FgIzaj IItJjopeWI4sDW7ZWHB/fFzHokSPZmj/IEFndEr44zHOidDeqk2GSw7oU A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: szAg/ruGQACTRZqAuLMFnA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 55pVKi0cTSOY66HPovWTLg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11800"; a="98310084" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,175,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="98310084" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 May 2026 01:48:04 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FfDdqrpOQKCTSLgvgbJbPg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: cm7/T7dEQP+9c9ico/Is8g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,175,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="280915197" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO f0d55cb201f0) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 May 2026 01:47:59 -0700 Received: from kbuild by f0d55cb201f0 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wSssm-00000000702-1IAn; Fri, 29 May 2026 08:47:56 +0000 Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 16:47:12 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Yury Norov , Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , Zi Yan , Matthew Brost , Joshua Hahn , Rakie Kim , Byungchul Park , Gregory Price , Ying Huang , Alistair Popple , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , Yury Norov , Farhad Alemi , Waiman Long , Rasmus Villemoes , cgroups@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't allow empty relative nodemask in mpol_relative_nodemask() Message-ID: <202605291631.6MATSv6v-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260528190337.878027-1-ynorov@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260528190337.878027-1-ynorov@nvidia.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam09 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 309B7A0009 X-Stat-Signature: rnt5i9ogcnuhtge9swsossbhkmrbjup5 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1780044484-82007 X-HE-Meta: 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 +2Y4+32j 1Zeur8y92kw6/8kT2LIop8sYW13ByqfVpaeSmNt3hRBnIaG+l2Ey+aDQeJz5AfJeWwxJtl1050tlka06rFbZTTdWr2fArMqzhK5bWaCHx5Y19mYdesZZQwwji2oQTIhakSFMgHl7R01d2AF1XmGVVGVhdCjB+qSxg2BiSBowlhPKpMOY/wqpn4fGqPc0wwFwHb5SuEVVwpRM24LRmdtuzsV3oqeihFpvR8QOlOeX8ltInFQlRI+W9PSqrqfWYBwDyb/vgGIbm8DgZ57NOPj32onjEzG3JEcauKQPl3c8p72+/rpmU7RtRgOIMGGlVkSF1QeRLg2haC6BKMlI8bqdmOTON+sQ0aubOKkOWGDI1AZlybM8rgzn65OJNWmiYcLOgylrTJzIqXesNTzUj1jLM3vD2o+2V3b8xxHyW3OYrPxn2Dv5JRD7R+8eZRfWbpPuil7Fv6lt4dDHcXUWfaj1bWdY8JA== Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Yury, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yury-Norov/mm-don-t-allow-empty-relative-nodemask-in-mpol_relative_nodemask/20260529-030835 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260528190337.878027-1-ynorov%40nvidia.com patch subject: [PATCH] mm: don't allow empty relative nodemask in mpol_relative_nodemask() config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20260529 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260529/202605291631.6MATSv6v-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260529/202605291631.6MATSv6v-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605291631.6MATSv6v-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/mempolicy.c: In function 'mpol_relative_nodemask': >> mm/mempolicy.c:377:24: error: 'return' with a value, in function returning void [-Wreturn-mismatch] 377 | return -EINVAL; | ^ mm/mempolicy.c:370:13: note: declared here 370 | static void mpol_relative_nodemask(nodemask_t *ret, const nodemask_t *orig, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kconfig warnings: (for reference only) WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MFD_STMFX Depends on [n]: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && I2C [=y] && OF [=n] Selected by [y]: - PINCTRL_STMFX [=y] && PINCTRL [=y] && I2C [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] vim +/return +377 mm/mempolicy.c 369 370 static void mpol_relative_nodemask(nodemask_t *ret, const nodemask_t *orig, 371 const nodemask_t *rel) 372 { 373 unsigned int w = nodes_weight(*rel); 374 nodemask_t tmp; 375 376 if (w == 0) > 377 return -EINVAL; 378 379 nodes_fold(tmp, *orig, w); 380 nodes_onto(*ret, tmp, *rel); 381 } 382 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki