From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/mempool: Untangle CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON abuse and switch to static key
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:22:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260613002207.1198-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604110318.2089-1-lirongqing@baidu.com>
On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 19:03:18 +0800 lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com> wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
>
> The mempool subsystem historically wrapped its debugging logic inside an
> merely defines compile-time defaults for SLUB and caused two flaws:
>
> 1. On production kernels where CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y but
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=n, mempool debugging was completely compiled out
> at compile time.
> 2. On kernels with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y, mempool debugging stayed active
> even if a user explicitly disabled slub debugging at boot time.
>
> Clean up this mess by removing the #ifdef and switching to a runtime static
> key (mempool_debug_enabled), allowing mempool debugging to be toggled
> cleanly via its own boot parameter.
Makes sense to me.
>
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
> Cc: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-13 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 11:03 [PATCH v3] mm/mempool: Untangle CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON abuse and switch to static key lirongqing
2026-06-12 10:12 ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2026-06-12 10:43 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-06-13 0:22 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2026-06-13 4:55 ` Harry Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260613002207.1198-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox