Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Jia <jiahao.kernel@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, mhocko@kernel.org, yosry@kernel.org,
	mkoutny@suse.com, nphamcs@gmail.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, roman.gushchin@linux.dev
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Hao Jia <jiahao1@lixiang.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/zswap: Support batch writeback in shrink_memcg()
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 19:20:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260629112032.20423-3-jiahao.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629112032.20423-1-jiahao.kernel@gmail.com>

From: Hao Jia <jiahao1@lixiang.com>

Currently, shrink_memcg() writes back at most one entry per-node during
its traversal. This makes shrink_worker() inefficient, as it must
repeatedly re-enter shrink_memcg() to make any substantial progress.

To address this, extend shrink_memcg() and rewrite its LRU iteration logic
to support batch writeback. Introduce the nr_to_scan parameter to bound how
many pages are scanned per call. This enables batch writeback in the
shrink_worker() path, while maintaining a low scan budget in the
zswap_store() path.

Additionally, to prepare for future proactive writeback, update the return
value semantics of shrink_memcg(): a positive value now represents the
actual number of compressed bytes written back, 0 indicates that candidates
existed but no writeback succeeded, and a negative value represents an
error code.

Suggested-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <jiahao1@lixiang.com>
---
 mm/zswap.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
index 0f8f04f22888..e2c2a3f1e061 100644
--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -160,6 +160,11 @@ struct zswap_pool {
 	char tfm_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
 };
 
+struct zswap_shrink_walk_arg {
+	unsigned long bytes_written;
+	bool encountered_page_in_swapcache;
+};
+
 /* Global LRU lists shared by all zswap pools. */
 static struct list_lru zswap_list_lru;
 
@@ -1089,8 +1094,9 @@ static enum lru_status shrink_memcg_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_o
 				       void *arg)
 {
 	struct zswap_entry *entry = container_of(item, struct zswap_entry, lru);
-	bool *encountered_page_in_swapcache = (bool *)arg;
+	struct zswap_shrink_walk_arg *walk_arg = arg;
 	swp_entry_t swpentry;
+	unsigned int length;
 	enum lru_status ret = LRU_REMOVED_RETRY;
 	int writeback_result;
 
@@ -1133,10 +1139,11 @@ static enum lru_status shrink_memcg_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_o
 
 	/*
 	 * Once the lru lock is dropped, the entry might get freed. The
-	 * swpentry is copied to the stack, and entry isn't deref'd again
-	 * until the entry is verified to still be alive in the tree.
+	 * needed fields are copied to the stack, and entry isn't deref'd
+	 * again until it is verified to still be alive in the tree.
 	 */
 	swpentry = entry->swpentry;
+	length = entry->length;
 
 	/*
 	 * It's safe to drop the lock here because we return either
@@ -1155,12 +1162,13 @@ static enum lru_status shrink_memcg_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_o
 		 * into the warmer region. We should terminate shrinking (if we're in the dynamic
 		 * shrinker context).
 		 */
-		if (writeback_result == -EEXIST && encountered_page_in_swapcache) {
+		if (writeback_result == -EEXIST) {
 			ret = LRU_STOP;
-			*encountered_page_in_swapcache = true;
+			walk_arg->encountered_page_in_swapcache = true;
 		}
 	} else {
 		zswap_written_back_pages++;
+		walk_arg->bytes_written += length;
 	}
 
 	return ret;
@@ -1169,8 +1177,11 @@ static enum lru_status shrink_memcg_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_o
 static unsigned long zswap_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 		struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
+	struct zswap_shrink_walk_arg walk_arg = {
+		.bytes_written = 0,
+		.encountered_page_in_swapcache = false,
+	};
 	unsigned long shrink_ret;
-	bool encountered_page_in_swapcache = false;
 
 	if (!zswap_shrinker_enabled ||
 			!mem_cgroup_zswap_writeback_enabled(sc->memcg)) {
@@ -1179,9 +1190,9 @@ static unsigned long zswap_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 	}
 
 	shrink_ret = list_lru_shrink_walk(&zswap_list_lru, sc, &shrink_memcg_cb,
-		&encountered_page_in_swapcache);
+		&walk_arg);
 
-	if (encountered_page_in_swapcache)
+	if (walk_arg.encountered_page_in_swapcache)
 		return SHRINK_STOP;
 
 	return shrink_ret ? shrink_ret : SHRINK_STOP;
@@ -1275,9 +1286,31 @@ static struct shrinker *zswap_alloc_shrinker(void)
 	return shrinker;
 }
 
-static int shrink_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+#define NR_ZSWAP_WB_BATCH	64UL
+
+/*
+ * Scan up to @nr_to_scan pages across the per-node zswap LRUs of @memcg
+ * and write back the reclaimable ones.
+ *
+ * Since the second-chance algorithm rotates referenced entries to the
+ * LRU tail, the per-node scan is capped at the current LRU length so
+ * each entry is scanned at most once per call. It is up to the caller
+ * to handle retries, deciding whether to scan another memcg to complete
+ * the full iteration, or to rescan the current memcg to drain its zswap
+ * entries.
+ *
+ * Return: The number of compressed bytes written back (>= 0), or -ENOENT
+ * if @memcg has writeback disabled, is a zombie cgroup, or has empty
+ * zswap LRUs.
+ */
+static long shrink_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long nr_to_scan)
 {
-	int nid, shrunk = 0, scanned = 0;
+	struct zswap_shrink_walk_arg walk_arg = {
+		.bytes_written = 0,
+		.encountered_page_in_swapcache = false,
+	};
+	unsigned long nr_remaining = nr_to_scan;
+	int nid;
 
 	if (!mem_cgroup_zswap_writeback_enabled(memcg))
 		return -ENOENT;
@@ -1290,24 +1323,40 @@ static int shrink_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
-		unsigned long nr_to_walk = 1;
+		unsigned long nr_to_walk;
 
-		shrunk += list_lru_walk_one(&zswap_list_lru, nid, memcg,
-					    &shrink_memcg_cb, NULL, &nr_to_walk);
-		scanned += 1 - nr_to_walk;
+		/*
+		 * Cap the scan at per-node LRU length so each entry is scanned
+		 * at most once per call.
+		 */
+		nr_to_walk = min(nr_remaining,
+				 list_lru_count_one(&zswap_list_lru, nid, memcg));
+		if (!nr_to_walk)
+			continue;
+
+		nr_remaining -= nr_to_walk;
+		list_lru_walk_one(&zswap_list_lru, nid, memcg, &shrink_memcg_cb,
+				  &walk_arg, &nr_to_walk);
+		/* Return the unused share of the budget to the pool. */
+		nr_remaining += nr_to_walk;
+
+		if (!nr_remaining)
+			break;
 	}
 
-	if (!scanned)
+	/* Nothing was scanned: every LRU under @memcg was empty. */
+	if (nr_remaining == nr_to_scan)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	return shrunk ? 0 : -EAGAIN;
+	return walk_arg.bytes_written;
 }
 
 static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
-	int ret, failures = 0, attempts = 0;
+	int failures = 0, attempts = 0;
 	unsigned long thr;
+	long ret;
 
 	/* Reclaim down to the accept threshold */
 	thr = zswap_accept_thr_pages();
@@ -1373,7 +1422,7 @@ static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
 			goto resched;
 		}
 
-		ret = shrink_memcg(memcg);
+		ret = shrink_memcg(memcg, NR_ZSWAP_WB_BATCH);
 		/* drop the extra reference */
 		mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
 
@@ -1394,7 +1443,7 @@ static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
 		}
 		++attempts;
 
-		if (ret && ++failures == MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
+		if (ret <= 0 && ++failures == MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
 			break;
 resched:
 		cond_resched();
@@ -1504,7 +1553,7 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
 	objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_folio(folio);
 	if (objcg && !obj_cgroup_may_zswap(objcg)) {
 		memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(objcg);
-		if (shrink_memcg(memcg)) {
+		if (shrink_memcg(memcg, num_node_state(N_NORMAL_MEMORY)) <= 0) {
 			mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
 			goto put_objcg;
 		}
-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-29 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-29 11:20 [PATCH v5 0/6] mm/zswap: Implement per-cgroup proactive writeback Hao Jia
2026-06-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] mm/zswap: Fix global shrinker when memory cgroup is disabled Hao Jia
2026-06-29 18:37   ` Nhat Pham
2026-06-30 10:51     ` Hao Jia
2026-06-30 16:02       ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-06-29 11:20 ` Hao Jia [this message]
2026-06-30  0:21   ` [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/zswap: Support batch writeback in shrink_memcg() Yosry Ahmed
2026-06-30  1:18     ` Hao Jia
2026-06-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] mm/zswap: Extract a reusable writeback helper from shrink_worker() Hao Jia
2026-06-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] mm/zswap: Implement proactive writeback Hao Jia
2026-06-30  0:15   ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-06-30  1:49     ` Hao Jia
2026-06-30 16:10       ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-06-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] mm/zswap: Add per-memcg stat for " Hao Jia
2026-06-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] selftests/cgroup: Add tests for zswap " Hao Jia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260629112032.20423-3-jiahao.kernel@gmail.com \
    --to=jiahao.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jiahao1@lixiang.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox