From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2114C43458 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 13:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B34EE6B00A6; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 09:52:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id AE6116B00AC; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 09:52:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9FB136B00AD; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 09:52:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7666B00A6 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 09:52:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110CDA036F for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 13:52:36 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84940347912.21.E113D9F Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7042514000B for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 13:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf26.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20260515 header.b="ICKU/rwX"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf26.hostedemail.com: domain of sj@kernel.org designates 172.234.252.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sj@kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; cv=none; t=1782913954; b=QaPnBWb4Z99PONIEig4ZuNodVq4HeNRFBag+Fc3KDo4d8GzSf2wi58Jiwmw43VVkrvBGpR Rg3ATjIvUOs6ktVnsM8lMCbJK6n3R5hjmAob8NIGo1D3cZIvhO4mFACcpWgEa4+PX03Fee b0RLxpzMlVS/SWLiiomx8EYbsF2tl7U= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1782913954; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=+at3T66B8FFjiwV+efoDLf0oTrOtgBnk1d6ck6Y4yMQ=; b=kXUGf0oVMdyftwiLONE0JyadxktgmMqpMUKOMbkUxgfzByjfqKDxh+dJbMjeooSr/1URS8 8R707cSO8B0ZO5q5o4fh4+4eGXabmbnuinm0ayPGyFHhTSzrX16sKOlvE2tlCE8PREZP3G VBgoD8ry4Tvq22tJjIx++MSEHWioM7c= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf26.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20260515 header.b="ICKU/rwX"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf26.hostedemail.com: domain of sj@kernel.org designates 172.234.252.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sj@kernel.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38F54347F; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 13:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48EDB1F000E9; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 13:52:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782913953; bh=+at3T66B8FFjiwV+efoDLf0oTrOtgBnk1d6ck6Y4yMQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=ICKU/rwXY7DwkHITW7EMOoaGekRc1WyhuV5kJ0PG1c1/xLDWoHsjSC+42yZxut8NF l/C1PSWibS76Kz5ziVH/A/7m77ocXbhbr7jhv/tYxUJdONs4MvfFaGDv8tMiNBzfpm 2Iel3q+VrqRLDymy5zYK7r4YjDeUJTxhqR4MsIDHypt0F4Lw82jcJ4ZumiUb42bcwv N2qHVv5UcBliLT+jZfZc80R0s/YLrq6r0Hyc291fr+GoKrmnxkJwn9Cso0Di+5wFau l0oR6W1mE+TNbuQHQOOgE/SWsYWQU1RJ7wICAgTgMWvujVttpQQjAJrO0xPagZpcsu 7kwlqjRTJniJg== From: SJ Park To: wang lian Cc: SJ Park , damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gutierrez.asier@huawei-partners.com, daichaobing@sangfor.com.cn, lianux.wang@processmission.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/damon: add mTHP collapse and split actions Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 06:52:19 -0700 Message-ID: <20260701135220.93697-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260701114716.56503-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7042514000B X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: os4z5boiand7nhuojj8fj37hcqc4qg97 X-HE-Tag: 1782913954-647413 X-HE-Meta: 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 V47xXopB 1oD/2QBtIpsQpDoKhyGo0DkzhjhRkwwWN5DW3e7L4eG8YoRocCME3ExHSubKTldFl5fu2PR19bBPebhzJJ+f/t1U9pLWR7sq/nbPTwuQwdYdATRqoWQ1ZTE+vo+lIY0hC8jDAgO0akV9rTAXlYSVB1KVBrRuQV94t3Dw1sE6fObaa4Kk5mfc1A5eMUvxMWAz3smjKoIshBw1RsIi5frXqbEPnUM4nnBS5NZHAevHorQmODLXvXwEoGbH0kU7ffdbslNp2UKLfQhQ3y6gYljb4n0ulcMc06HrI2iU8MKMqDMnrZXpUx/i/ET183Q== Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is the first version of this series that has dropped the RFC tag. From the next time, please reset the version number when you drop RFC. E.g., RFC PATCH -> RFC PATCH v2 -> RFC PATCH v3 -> PATCH v1 -> PATCH v2 Also, droppping RFC means you think this patch is ready to be merged as-is. It is important because the level of review should also be different for RFC and non-RFC patches. I'm unsure if this is your intention or you just mistakenly dropped the tag, because I was expecting RFC v2 for this series. Could you please clarify? I will hold review of this series before the answer to the above question is clear. Thanks, SJ [...]