Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
To: rppt@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: numa_memblks: set numa_nodes_parsed in numa_add_memblk()
Date: Fri,  3 Jul 2026 13:13:21 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703041329.2797584-2-ekffu200098@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703041329.2797584-1-ekffu200098@gmail.com>

Every existing numa_add_memblk() caller separately marks the new node in
numa_nodes_parsed with node_set().  Set the node in numa_add_memblk() itself
on a successful add, so this no longer depends on each caller.

numa_add_memblk_to() now returns -EINVAL for an out-of-range node id, so a
zero return implies @nid was valid.  No caller passes an invalid one, so
existing callers are unaffected.

The per-caller node_set() calls are removed in later patches.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
---
 mm/numa_memblks.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c
index 3c3c4eac3514..9815192549c3 100644
--- a/mm/numa_memblks.c
+++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c
@@ -135,13 +135,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__node_distance);
 static int __init numa_add_memblk_to(int nid, u64 start, u64 end,
 				     struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 {
+	/* whine about and ignore invalid nid */
+	if (nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
+		pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node id %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
+			nid, start, end - 1);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	/* ignore zero length blks */
 	if (start == end)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* whine about and ignore invalid blks */
-	if (start > end || nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
-		pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
+	if (start > end) {
+		pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node size %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
 			nid, start, end - 1);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -193,13 +200,20 @@ static void __init numa_move_tail_memblk(struct numa_meminfo *dst, int idx,
  * @end: End address of the new memblk
  *
  * Add a new memblk to the default numa_meminfo.
+ * On success @nid is also set in numa_nodes_parsed.
  *
  * RETURNS:
  * 0 on success, -errno on failure.
  */
 int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
 {
-	return numa_add_memblk_to(nid, start, end, &numa_meminfo);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = numa_add_memblk_to(nid, start, end, &numa_meminfo);
+	if (!ret)
+		node_set(nid, numa_nodes_parsed);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.43.0



  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-03  4:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-03  4:13 [PATCH v2 0/9] treewide, numa_memblks: remove redundant work during NUMA init Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-07-03  4:13 ` Sang-Heon Jeon [this message]
2026-07-03  4:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] ACPI: NUMA: remove redundant numa_nodes_parsed node_set() Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-07-03  4:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] of/numa: " Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-07-03  4:13 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/numa: " Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-07-03  4:13 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] arch_numa: " Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-07-03  4:13 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] LoongArch: " Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-07-03  4:13 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mm: numa_memblks: remove redundant numa_nodemask_from_meminfo() Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-07-03  4:13 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] arch_numa: remove redundant node_possible_map assignment Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-07-03  4:13 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: numa_memblks: use numa_add_reserved_memblk() in numa_cleanup_meminfo() Sang-Heon Jeon
2026-07-03  9:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] treewide, numa_memblks: remove redundant work during NUMA init Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260703041329.2797584-2-ekffu200098@gmail.com \
    --to=ekffu200098@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox