From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/6] mm/damon/core: update probe hits for new parameter commit
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 21:38:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707043828.97900-6-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707043828.97900-1-sj@kernel.org>
Users can update DAMON parameters at runtime. If the samples and/or
aggregation intervals are updated in this way, monitoring results
depending on the intervals should also be updated for a more accurate
snapshot. The age and nr_accesses are properly updated, while
probe_hits are not updated in the way. Do the update.
Signed-off-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
mm/damon/core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 13 ++++++++++---
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
index cda318806b65b..9a3ff0fe55a61 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core.c
+++ b/mm/damon/core.c
@@ -898,10 +898,32 @@ static unsigned int damon_nr_samples_for_new_attrs(unsigned int nr_accesses,
new_attrs);
}
+static void damon_update_probe_hits(struct damon_region *r,
+ struct damon_attrs *old_attrs, struct damon_attrs *new_attrs,
+ bool aggregating, struct damon_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ struct damon_probe *p;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ damon_for_each_probe(p, ctx) {
+ r->last_probe_hits[i] = damon_nr_samples_for_new_attrs(
+ r->last_probe_hits[i], old_attrs, new_attrs);
+ if (!aggregating)
+ r->probe_hits[i] = damon_nr_samples_for_new_attrs(
+ r->probe_hits[i], old_attrs,
+ new_attrs);
+ else
+ r->probe_hits[i] = 0;
+ i++;
+ }
+}
+
static void damon_update_monitoring_result(struct damon_region *r,
struct damon_attrs *old_attrs, struct damon_attrs *new_attrs,
- bool aggregating)
+ bool aggregating, struct damon_ctx *ctx)
{
+ damon_update_probe_hits(r, old_attrs, new_attrs, aggregating, ctx);
+
r->last_nr_accesses = damon_nr_samples_for_new_attrs(
r->last_nr_accesses, old_attrs, new_attrs);
if (!aggregating)
@@ -941,8 +963,8 @@ static void damon_update_monitoring_results(struct damon_ctx *ctx,
damon_for_each_target(t, ctx)
damon_for_each_region(r, t)
- damon_update_monitoring_result(
- r, old_attrs, new_attrs, aggregating);
+ damon_update_monitoring_result(r, old_attrs, new_attrs,
+ aggregating, ctx);
}
/*
diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
index 86eae3a590354..8e01437eb5ea8 100644
--- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
+++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
@@ -603,32 +603,39 @@ static void damon_test_update_monitoring_result(struct kunit *test)
.sample_interval = 10, .aggr_interval = 1000,};
struct damon_attrs new_attrs;
struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(3, 7);
+ struct damon_ctx *ctx;
if (!r)
kunit_skip(test, "region alloc fail");
+ ctx = damon_new_ctx();
+ if (!ctx) {
+ damon_free_region(r);
+ kunit_skip(test, "ctx alloc fail");
+ }
r->nr_accesses = 15;
r->age = 20;
new_attrs = (struct damon_attrs){
.sample_interval = 100, .aggr_interval = 10000,};
- damon_update_monitoring_result(r, &old_attrs, &new_attrs, false);
+ damon_update_monitoring_result(r, &old_attrs, &new_attrs, false, ctx);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->nr_accesses, 15);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->age, 2);
new_attrs = (struct damon_attrs){
.sample_interval = 1, .aggr_interval = 1000};
- damon_update_monitoring_result(r, &old_attrs, &new_attrs, false);
+ damon_update_monitoring_result(r, &old_attrs, &new_attrs, false, ctx);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->nr_accesses, 150);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->age, 2);
new_attrs = (struct damon_attrs){
.sample_interval = 1, .aggr_interval = 100};
- damon_update_monitoring_result(r, &old_attrs, &new_attrs, false);
+ damon_update_monitoring_result(r, &old_attrs, &new_attrs, false, ctx);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->nr_accesses, 150);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->age, 20);
damon_free_region(r);
+ damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
}
static void damon_test_set_attrs(struct kunit *test)
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 4:38 [RFC PATCH 0/6] mm/damon: update probe hits for runtime parameter commits SJ Park
2026-07-07 4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] mm/damon/core: s/damon_max_nr_accesses()/damon_nr_samples_per_aggr()/ SJ Park
2026-07-07 4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] mm/damon/core: s/accesses_bp_to_nr_accesses/sample_bp_to_count/ SJ Park
2026-07-07 4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm/damon/core: s/nr_accesses_to_accesses_bp/sample_count_to_bp/ SJ Park
2026-07-07 4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] mm/damon/core: s/nr_accesses_for_new_attrs/nr_samples_for_new_attrs/ SJ Park
2026-07-07 4:38 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-07-07 4:38 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] mm/damon/core: handle unreset probe_hits in probe_hits_mvsum() SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260707043828.97900-6-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox