Re: [PATCH] mm: kmemleak: confirm suspected leaks with a second scan

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Thu,  9 Jul 2026 18:24:47 +0100 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:

> The kmemleak marking phase is not atomic. While the object graph is
> traversed, the kernel can modify pointers, free objects or allocate new
> ones. If a reference to an object is moved from one location to another,
> kmemleak scanning may miss it. We have explicit annotations like
> kmemleak_transient_leak() but identifying and maintaining them is not
> trivial.
> 
> Given that such transient leaks are short-lived, rather than just
> reporting such objects as leaks, do another scan to confirm the
> suspected objects. If no new leaks are found during the first scan, skip
> the confirmation one.

All sort of build errors here due to other changes which are queued in
mm.git.

> BTW, I'll be away from Saturday for three weeks. I may reply
> occasionally but won't be able to test anything.

Have a great time - we'll be here when you get back.