From: Hao Jia <jiahao.kernel@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, mhocko@kernel.org, yosry@kernel.org,
mkoutny@suse.com, nphamcs@gmail.com, chengming.zhou@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, roman.gushchin@linux.dev
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Hao Jia <jiahao1@lixiang.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm/zswap: Support batch writeback in shrink_memcg()
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 16:15:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714081510.16895-3-jiahao.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714081510.16895-1-jiahao.kernel@gmail.com>
From: Hao Jia <jiahao1@lixiang.com>
Currently, shrink_memcg() writes back at most one entry per-node during
its traversal. This makes shrink_worker() inefficient, as it must
repeatedly re-enter shrink_memcg() to make any substantial progress.
To address this, extend shrink_memcg() and rewrite its LRU iteration logic
to support batch writeback. Introduce the nr_to_scan parameter to bound how
many pages are scanned per call. This enables batch writeback in the
shrink_worker() path, while maintaining a low scan budget in the
zswap_store() path.
Additionally, to prepare for future proactive writeback, update the return
value semantics of shrink_memcg(): a positive value now represents the
actual number of compressed bytes written back, 0 indicates that candidates
existed but no writeback succeeded, and a negative value represents an
error code.
Test Setup:
Total memory: 32 GB.
zswap settings: max_pool_percent=1, accept_threshold_percent=50,
shrinker_enabled=N.
Allocate 512MB of anonymous pages and fill them with random data (to avoid
compression), then use cgroup memory.reclaim to force a large amount of
anonymous pages into zswap. At an interval of 2ms, allocate a 4K anonymous
page where the first 4 bytes are random numbers and the rest are zeros, and
then trigger a reclamation of this 4K anonymous page through cgroup
memory.reclaim. When the pool threshold is reached, shrink_memcg() will
be triggered.
The test data after running for 120s is as follows:
Baseline Patched
shrink_worker wakeups 5363 85
shrink_memcg calls 11,345,012 188,264
written_back 40214 40275
Conclusion:
Under the same workload and run duration, the patched kernel shows a
significant reduction in both shrink_worker wakeups and shrink_memcg calls.
Suggested-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <jiahao1@lixiang.com>
---
mm/zswap.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
index 3d697a1a5365..6d492762957a 100644
--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -160,6 +160,11 @@ struct zswap_pool {
char tfm_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
};
+struct zswap_shrink_walk_arg {
+ unsigned long bytes_written;
+ bool encountered_page_in_swapcache;
+};
+
/* Global LRU lists shared by all zswap pools. */
static struct list_lru zswap_list_lru;
@@ -1089,8 +1094,9 @@ static enum lru_status shrink_memcg_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_o
void *arg)
{
struct zswap_entry *entry = container_of(item, struct zswap_entry, lru);
- bool *encountered_page_in_swapcache = (bool *)arg;
+ struct zswap_shrink_walk_arg *walk_arg = arg;
swp_entry_t swpentry;
+ unsigned int length;
enum lru_status ret = LRU_REMOVED_RETRY;
int writeback_result;
@@ -1133,10 +1139,11 @@ static enum lru_status shrink_memcg_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_o
/*
* Once the lru lock is dropped, the entry might get freed. The
- * swpentry is copied to the stack, and entry isn't deref'd again
- * until the entry is verified to still be alive in the tree.
+ * needed fields are copied to the stack, and entry isn't deref'd
+ * again until it is verified to still be alive in the tree.
*/
swpentry = entry->swpentry;
+ length = entry->length;
/*
* It's safe to drop the lock here because we return either
@@ -1155,12 +1162,13 @@ static enum lru_status shrink_memcg_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_o
* into the warmer region. We should terminate shrinking (if we're in the dynamic
* shrinker context).
*/
- if (writeback_result == -EEXIST && encountered_page_in_swapcache) {
+ if (writeback_result == -EEXIST) {
ret = LRU_STOP;
- *encountered_page_in_swapcache = true;
+ walk_arg->encountered_page_in_swapcache = true;
}
} else {
zswap_written_back_pages++;
+ walk_arg->bytes_written += length;
}
return ret;
@@ -1169,8 +1177,11 @@ static enum lru_status shrink_memcg_cb(struct list_head *item, struct list_lru_o
static unsigned long zswap_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker,
struct shrink_control *sc)
{
+ struct zswap_shrink_walk_arg walk_arg = {
+ .bytes_written = 0,
+ .encountered_page_in_swapcache = false,
+ };
unsigned long shrink_ret;
- bool encountered_page_in_swapcache = false;
if (!zswap_shrinker_enabled ||
!mem_cgroup_zswap_writeback_enabled(sc->memcg)) {
@@ -1179,9 +1190,9 @@ static unsigned long zswap_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker,
}
shrink_ret = list_lru_shrink_walk(&zswap_list_lru, sc, &shrink_memcg_cb,
- &encountered_page_in_swapcache);
+ &walk_arg);
- if (encountered_page_in_swapcache)
+ if (walk_arg.encountered_page_in_swapcache)
return SHRINK_STOP;
return shrink_ret ? shrink_ret : SHRINK_STOP;
@@ -1275,9 +1286,31 @@ static struct shrinker *zswap_alloc_shrinker(void)
return shrinker;
}
-static int shrink_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+#define NR_ZSWAP_WB_BATCH 64UL
+
+/*
+ * Scan up to @nr_to_scan pages across the per-node zswap LRUs of @memcg
+ * and write back the reclaimable ones.
+ *
+ * Since the second-chance algorithm rotates referenced entries to the
+ * LRU tail, the per-node scan is capped at the current LRU length so
+ * each entry is scanned at most once per call. It is up to the caller
+ * to handle retries, deciding whether to scan another memcg to complete
+ * the full iteration, or to rescan the current memcg to drain its zswap
+ * entries.
+ *
+ * Return: The number of compressed bytes written back (>= 0), or -ENOENT
+ * if @memcg has writeback disabled, is a zombie cgroup, or has empty
+ * zswap LRUs.
+ */
+static long shrink_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long nr_to_scan)
{
- int nid, shrunk = 0, scanned = 0;
+ struct zswap_shrink_walk_arg walk_arg = {
+ .bytes_written = 0,
+ .encountered_page_in_swapcache = false,
+ };
+ unsigned long nr_remaining = nr_to_scan;
+ int nid;
if (!mem_cgroup_zswap_writeback_enabled(memcg))
return -ENOENT;
@@ -1290,24 +1323,40 @@ static int shrink_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
return -ENOENT;
for_each_node_state(nid, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
- unsigned long nr_to_walk = 1;
+ unsigned long nr_to_walk;
- shrunk += list_lru_walk_one(&zswap_list_lru, nid, memcg,
- &shrink_memcg_cb, NULL, &nr_to_walk);
- scanned += 1 - nr_to_walk;
+ /*
+ * Cap the scan at per-node LRU length so each entry is scanned
+ * at most once per call.
+ */
+ nr_to_walk = min(nr_remaining,
+ list_lru_count_one(&zswap_list_lru, nid, memcg));
+ if (!nr_to_walk)
+ continue;
+
+ nr_remaining -= nr_to_walk;
+ list_lru_walk_one(&zswap_list_lru, nid, memcg, &shrink_memcg_cb,
+ &walk_arg, &nr_to_walk);
+ /* Return the unused share of the budget to the pool. */
+ nr_remaining += nr_to_walk;
+
+ if (!nr_remaining)
+ break;
}
- if (!scanned)
+ /* Nothing was scanned: every LRU under @memcg was empty. */
+ if (nr_remaining == nr_to_scan)
return -ENOENT;
- return shrunk ? 0 : -EAGAIN;
+ return walk_arg.bytes_written;
}
static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
{
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
- int ret, failures = 0, attempts = 0;
+ int failures = 0, attempts = 0;
unsigned long thr;
+ long ret;
/* Reclaim down to the accept threshold */
thr = zswap_accept_thr_pages();
@@ -1369,7 +1418,7 @@ static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
goto resched;
}
- ret = shrink_memcg(memcg);
+ ret = shrink_memcg(memcg, NR_ZSWAP_WB_BATCH);
/* drop the extra reference */
mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
@@ -1383,7 +1432,7 @@ static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
continue;
++attempts;
- if (ret && ++failures == MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
+ if (ret <= 0 && ++failures == MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES)
break;
resched:
cond_resched();
@@ -1493,7 +1542,7 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_folio(folio);
if (objcg && !obj_cgroup_may_zswap(objcg)) {
memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(objcg);
- if (shrink_memcg(memcg)) {
+ if (shrink_memcg(memcg, 1) <= 0) {
mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
goto put_objcg;
}
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 8:15 [PATCH 0/2] mm/zswap: Fixes and improves the zswap global shrinker Hao Jia
2026-07-14 8:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/zswap: Fix global shrinker when memory cgroup is disabled Hao Jia
2026-07-14 8:15 ` Hao Jia [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260714081510.16895-3-jiahao.kernel@gmail.com \
--to=jiahao.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jiahao1@lixiang.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yosry@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox