Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org
Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
	surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, kasong@tencent.com,
	qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, baohua@kernel.org,
	axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	riel@surriel.com, harry@kernel.org, jannh@google.com,
	lance.yang@linux.dev, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] mm/rmap: batch unmap file folios belonging to uffd-wp VMAs
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:18:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715111839.1667914-4-dev.jain@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715111839.1667914-1-dev.jain@arm.com>

Commit a67fe41e214f ("mm: rmap: support batched unmapping for file large folios")
extended batched unmapping for file folios. That also required making
install_uffd_wp_pte_if_needed() support batching, but that was left
out for the time being, and correctness was maintained by stopping
batching in case the VMA the folio belongs to is marked uffd-wp.

Now that we have a batched version called cond_install_uffd_wp_ptes,
simply call that. folio_unmap_pte_batch() ensures that the original state
of the ptes is either all uffd or all non-uffd, so we maintain
correctness.

If uffd-wp bit is there, we have the following transitions of ptes
after unmapping, for a file folio:

present -> uffd-wp marker

We must ensure that these ptes are not reprocessed by the while loop -
if the batch length is less than the number of pages in the folio, then
we must skip over this batch.

The page_vma_mapped_walk API ensures this - check_pte() will return true
only if any of [pvmw->pfn, pvmw->pfn + nr_pages) is mapped by the pte.
There is no pfn underlying a uffd-wp marker pte, so check_pte returns
false and we keep skipping until we hit a present entry, which is where
we want to batch from next.

Note that for the uffd-rwp case, we already do not make a uffd marker in
cond_install_uffd_wp_ptes.

Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
---
Dropped David's ACK due to the uffd-rwp changes.

 mm/rmap.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 2f938d0ac6953..ac88673600fa0 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1965,9 +1965,6 @@ static inline unsigned int folio_unmap_pte_batch(struct folio *folio,
 	if (pte_unused(pte))
 		return 1;
 
-	if (userfaultfd_protected(vma))
-		return 1;
-
 	/*
 	 * If unmap fails, we need to restore the ptes. To avoid accidentally
 	 * upgrading write permissions for ptes that were not originally
@@ -2345,7 +2342,8 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 * we may want to replace a none pte with a marker pte if
 		 * it's file-backed, so we don't lose the tracking info.
 		 */
-		cond_install_uffd_wp_ptes(vma, address, pvmw.pte, pteval, 1);
+		cond_install_uffd_wp_ptes(vma, address, pvmw.pte, pteval,
+					  nr_pages);
 
 		/* Update high watermark before we lower rss */
 		update_hiwater_rss(mm);
-- 
2.43.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-15 11:18 [PATCH 0/3] Batch unmap of uffd-wp file folios Dev Jain
2026-07-15 11:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/memory: move pte_install_uffd_wp_if_needed() into memory.c Dev Jain
2026-07-15 11:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/memory: batch set uffd-wp markers during zapping Dev Jain
2026-07-15 11:18 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-07-15 18:58 ` [PATCH 0/3] Batch unmap of uffd-wp file folios Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260715111839.1667914-4-dev.jain@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox