From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Cong Wang <cwang@multikernel.io>
Subject: [PATCH v6 6/8] seccomp: re-validate a redirected syscall against outer filters
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:20:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715212007.2382846-7-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715212007.2382846-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
From: Cong Wang <cwang@multikernel.io>
Stacked filters compose by taking the most restrictive verdict over one
evaluation of a single seccomp_data, assuming the syscall they voted on
is the syscall that runs. SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND_REDIRECT breaks that:
the supervisor rewrites the argument registers and the syscall resumes
without the stack being re-consulted, so an inner, container-installed
filter can redirect a syscall into a form an outer filter would have
blocked.
Close the hole with seccomp_redirect_revalidate(): after a redirect it
walks from the notifier outward, judging the substituted syscall one
filter at a time; the innermost filter that does not allow it decides.
ALLOW and LOG fall through; ERRNO, TRAP and KILL are terminal;
USER_NOTIF consults the outer supervisor, whose plain FLAG_CONTINUE
keeps the walk going; TRACE fails closed with -ENOSYS, since a tracer
rewrite cannot be soundly re-composed mid-walk.
The walk is strictly outward, so the notifier is never reconsulted and
no re-notify loop exists, so a deep chain cannot exhaust the kernel
stack. A redirect never changes the syscall number, only the argument
registers differ.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.8
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cwang@multikernel.io>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 17fe4c360839..b1fd2ec44324 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -93,6 +93,13 @@ struct seccomp_knotif {
long val;
u32 flags;
+ /*
+ * Set by SEND_REDIRECT: the reply rewrote the syscall's registers,
+ * so on resume the syscall must be re-evaluated against the filters
+ * outer to the one that notified (see __seccomp_filter()).
+ */
+ bool redirect;
+
/*
* Signals when this has changed states, such as the listener
* dying, a new seccomp addfd message, or changing to REPLIED
@@ -1183,10 +1190,12 @@ static bool should_sleep_killable(struct seccomp_filter *match,
static int seccomp_do_user_notification(int this_syscall,
struct seccomp_filter *match,
- const struct seccomp_data *sd)
+ const struct seccomp_data *sd,
+ bool *redirected)
{
int err;
u32 flags = 0;
+ bool redirect = false;
long ret = 0;
struct seccomp_knotif n = {};
struct seccomp_kaddfd *addfd, *tmp;
@@ -1243,6 +1252,7 @@ static int seccomp_do_user_notification(int this_syscall,
ret = n.val;
err = n.error;
flags = n.flags;
+ redirect = n.redirect;
interrupted:
/* If there were any pending addfd calls, clear them out */
@@ -1269,19 +1279,120 @@ static int seccomp_do_user_notification(int this_syscall,
mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock);
/* Userspace requests to continue the syscall. */
- if (flags & SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE)
+ if (flags & SECCOMP_USER_NOTIF_FLAG_CONTINUE) {
+ *redirected = redirect;
return 0;
+ }
syscall_set_return_value(current, current_pt_regs(),
err, ret);
return -1;
}
+static void seccomp_kill_task(int this_syscall, u32 action, int data)
+{
+ current->seccomp.mode = SECCOMP_MODE_DEAD;
+ seccomp_log(this_syscall, SIGSYS, action, true);
+ /* Dump core only if this is the last remaining thread. */
+ if (action != SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD ||
+ (atomic_read(¤t->signal->live) == 1)) {
+ /* Show the original registers in the dump. */
+ syscall_rollback(current, current_pt_regs());
+ /* Trigger a coredump with SIGSYS */
+ force_sig_seccomp(this_syscall, data, true);
+ } else {
+ do_exit(SIGSYS);
+ }
+}
+
+static int seccomp_redirect_revalidate(struct seccomp_filter *notifier)
+{
+ struct seccomp_filter *f;
+ struct seccomp_data sd;
+ bool redirected = false;
+ int this_syscall;
+ u32 action;
+ int data;
+
+ populate_seccomp_data(&sd);
+ this_syscall = sd.nr;
+
+ for (f = notifier->prev; f; f = f->prev) {
+ u32 cur_ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(f->prog, &sd);
+
+ data = cur_ret & SECCOMP_RET_DATA;
+ action = cur_ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL;
+
+ switch (action) {
+ case SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW:
+ continue;
+
+ case SECCOMP_RET_LOG:
+ seccomp_log(this_syscall, 0, action, true);
+ continue;
+
+ case SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO:
+ /* Set low-order bits as an errno, capped at MAX_ERRNO. */
+ if (data > MAX_ERRNO)
+ data = MAX_ERRNO;
+ syscall_set_return_value(current, current_pt_regs(),
+ -data, 0);
+ goto skip;
+
+ case SECCOMP_RET_TRAP:
+ /* Show the handler the original registers. */
+ syscall_rollback(current, current_pt_regs());
+ /* Let the filter pass back 16 bits of data. */
+ force_sig_seccomp(this_syscall, data, false);
+ goto skip;
+
+ case SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF:
+ /*
+ * The outer supervisor judges the substituted call:
+ * an error reply skips it, a plain FLAG_CONTINUE
+ * keeps the walk going, or this reply would slip the
+ * call past a stricter filter further out. It cannot
+ * redirect again: at most one redirect-capable
+ * listener exists in a chain, and the walk starts
+ * outside it.
+ */
+ if (seccomp_do_user_notification(this_syscall, f, &sd,
+ &redirected))
+ goto skip;
+ continue;
+
+ case SECCOMP_RET_TRACE:
+ /*
+ * A tracer may rewrite the syscall, and there is no
+ * defensible way to restart composition mid-walk.
+ * Fail closed exactly like TRACE with no tracer
+ * attached: skip with -ENOSYS.
+ */
+ syscall_set_return_value(current, current_pt_regs(),
+ -ENOSYS, 0);
+ goto skip;
+
+ case SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD:
+ case SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS:
+ default:
+ seccomp_kill_task(this_syscall, action, data);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+skip:
+ seccomp_log(this_syscall, 0, action, f->log);
+ return -1;
+}
+
static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
{
u32 filter_ret, action;
struct seccomp_data sd;
struct seccomp_filter *match = NULL;
+ bool redirected = false;
int data;
/*
@@ -1356,9 +1467,19 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
return 0;
case SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF:
- if (seccomp_do_user_notification(this_syscall, match, &sd))
+ if (seccomp_do_user_notification(this_syscall, match, &sd,
+ &redirected))
goto skip;
+ /*
+ * A redirect rewrote the argument registers; every filter
+ * outer to the notifier must judge the substituted syscall
+ * before it runs. A redirect from the outermost filter has
+ * no outer filter left to judge it.
+ */
+ if (redirected && match->prev)
+ return seccomp_redirect_revalidate(match);
+
return 0;
case SECCOMP_RET_LOG:
@@ -1376,18 +1497,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
case SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD:
case SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS:
default:
- current->seccomp.mode = SECCOMP_MODE_DEAD;
- seccomp_log(this_syscall, SIGSYS, action, true);
- /* Dump core only if this is the last remaining thread. */
- if (action != SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD ||
- (atomic_read(¤t->signal->live) == 1)) {
- /* Show the original registers in the dump. */
- syscall_rollback(current, current_pt_regs());
- /* Trigger a coredump with SIGSYS */
- force_sig_seccomp(this_syscall, data, true);
- } else {
- do_exit(SIGSYS);
- }
+ seccomp_kill_task(this_syscall, action, data);
return -1; /* skip the syscall go directly to signal handling */
}
@@ -2207,6 +2317,7 @@ static long seccomp_notify_send_redirect(struct seccomp_filter *filter,
goto out_unlock_free;
}
+ knotif->redirect = true;
knotif->state = SECCOMP_NOTIFY_REPLIED;
knotif->error = 0;
knotif->val = 0;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 21:19 [PATCH v6 0/8] seccomp: non-cooperative pinned-memfd argument redirect Cong Wang
2026-07-15 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] mm: pass the target mm parameter through get_unmapped_area family Cong Wang
2026-07-15 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] mm: add __do_mmap() and vm_mmap_remote()/vm_munmap_remote() Cong Wang
2026-07-15 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] seccomp: introduce SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_PIN_INSTALL Cong Wang
2026-07-15 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] seccomp: add __NR_seccomp_* aliases for rt_sigreturn and clone/fork Cong Wang
2026-07-15 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] seccomp: add kernel-installed pinned-memfd redirect Cong Wang
2026-07-15 21:20 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2026-07-15 21:20 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] docs/seccomp: document pinned-memfd redirect ioctls Cong Wang
2026-07-15 21:20 ` [PATCH v6] selftests/seccomp: cover non-cooperative pinned-memfd install Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715212007.2382846-7-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cwang@multikernel.io \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox