From: Zhang Peng <zippermonkey@icloud.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] mm/vmscan: extract pageout_one() from shrink_folio_list()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:07:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720-batch-tlb-flush-v5-3-db943a0d0d6b@icloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720-batch-tlb-flush-v5-0-db943a0d0d6b@icloud.com>
shrink_folio_list() contains a self-contained pageout() dispatch state
machine. Extract it into pageout_one() to reduce the size of
shrink_folio_list() and make the pageout step independently readable.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Peng <bruzzhang@tencent.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index a0807dd01c5a..3e18948e90d1 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1163,8 +1163,65 @@ static bool folio_try_reclaim_free(struct folio *folio,
return true;
}
+static bool folio_try_pageout(struct folio *folio,
+ struct folio_batch *free_folios,
+ struct scan_control *sc, struct reclaim_stat *stat,
+ struct swap_iocb **plug, struct list_head *folio_list,
+ unsigned int *nr_reclaimed)
+{
+ struct address_space *mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
+ unsigned int nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
+ switch (pageout(folio, mapping, plug, folio_list)) {
+ case PAGE_ACTIVATE:
+ /*
+ * If shmem folio is split when writeback to swap, the
+ * tail pages will make their own pass through this
+ * function and be accounted then.
+ */
+ if (nr_pages > 1 && !folio_test_large(folio))
+ sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
+ folio_activate_locked(folio, stat);
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ return false;
+ case PAGE_KEEP:
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ return false;
+ case PAGE_SUCCESS:
+ if (nr_pages > 1 && !folio_test_large(folio)) {
+ sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
+ nr_pages = 1;
+ }
+ stat->nr_pageout += nr_pages;
+
+ if (folio_test_writeback(folio))
+ return false;
+ if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * A synchronous write - probably a ramdisk. Go ahead
+ * and try to reclaim the folio.
+ */
+ if (!folio_trylock(folio))
+ return false;
+ if (folio_test_dirty(folio) ||
+ folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ return false;
+ }
+ fallthrough;
+ case PAGE_CLEAN:
+ ; /* try to free the folio below */
+ }
+ if (folio_try_reclaim_free(folio, free_folios, sc, stat, nr_reclaimed))
+ return true;
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
- * shrink_folio_list() returns the number of reclaimed pages
+ * Reclaimed folios are counted in the return value.
*/
static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
@@ -1501,53 +1558,16 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
goto keep_locked;
if (!sc->may_writepage)
goto keep_locked;
-
/*
* Folio is dirty. Flush the TLB if a writable entry
* potentially exists to avoid CPU writes after I/O
* starts and then write it out here.
*/
try_to_unmap_flush_dirty();
- switch (pageout(folio, mapping, &plug, folio_list)) {
- case PAGE_KEEP:
- goto keep_locked;
- case PAGE_ACTIVATE:
- /*
- * If shmem folio is split when writeback to swap,
- * the tail pages will make their own pass through
- * this function and be accounted then.
- */
- if (nr_pages > 1 && !folio_test_large(folio)) {
- sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
- nr_pages = 1;
- }
- goto activate_locked;
- case PAGE_SUCCESS:
- if (nr_pages > 1 && !folio_test_large(folio)) {
- sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
- nr_pages = 1;
- }
- stat->nr_pageout += nr_pages;
-
- if (folio_test_writeback(folio))
- goto keep;
- if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
- goto keep;
-
- /*
- * A synchronous write - probably a ramdisk. Go
- * ahead and try to reclaim the folio.
- */
- if (!folio_trylock(folio))
- goto keep;
- if (folio_test_dirty(folio) ||
- folio_test_writeback(folio))
- goto keep_locked;
- mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
- fallthrough;
- case PAGE_CLEAN:
- ; /* try to free the folio below */
- }
+ if (!folio_try_pageout(folio, &free_folios, sc, stat,
+ &plug, folio_list, &nr_reclaimed))
+ goto keep;
+ continue;
}
if (!folio_try_reclaim_free(folio, &free_folios, sc, stat,
--
2.43.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 5:07 [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: batch TLB flushing for dirty folios in vmscan Zhang Peng
2026-07-20 5:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] mm/vmscan: introduce folio_activate_locked() helper Zhang Peng
2026-08-10 8:36 ` Barry Song
2026-07-20 5:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio_free() from shrink_folio_list() Zhang Peng
2026-08-13 21:40 ` Barry Song
2026-07-20 5:07 ` Zhang Peng [this message]
2026-08-13 21:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] mm/vmscan: extract pageout_one() " Barry Song
2026-07-20 5:07 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] mm/vmscan: extract folio unmap logic into folio_try_unmap() Zhang Peng
2026-08-13 21:52 ` Barry Song
2026-07-20 5:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] mm/vmscan: flush TLB for every 31 folios evictions Zhang Peng
2026-08-13 21:58 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720-batch-tlb-flush-v5-3-db943a0d0d6b@icloud.com \
--to=zippermonkey@icloud.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=bruzzhang@tencent.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox