From: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <ziy@nvidia.com>, <david@kernel.org>,
<luizcap@redhat.com>, <willy@infradead.org>,
<linmiaohe@huawei.com>, <svetly.todorov@memverge.com>,
<xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>, <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <sunnanyong@huawei.com>,
<tujinjiang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] fs: stable_page_flags(): use BIT_ULL() for KPF flags
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:30:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720033021.4091944-2-tujinjiang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720033021.4091944-1-tujinjiang@huawei.com>
The stable_page_flags() function currently sets page flag bits using
"1 << KPF_xxx" for various KPF_* definitions. KPF_* may be larger than 32,
which will trigger -Wshift-count-overflow warning. All KPF_* values
currently used in "1 << KPF_xxx" are smaller than 33, so no warning is
triggered with current code.
Replace all occurrences of "1 << KPF_*" with the BIT_ULL() macro to
ensure all shifts are performed on a 64-bit unsigned type. This makes
the code robust, and safe for future extension.
No functional change is intended.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang@huawei.com>
---
fs/proc/page.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/page.c b/fs/proc/page.c
index 7d9387143435..ee39b321f1c6 100644
--- a/fs/proc/page.c
+++ b/fs/proc/page.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ u64 stable_page_flags(const struct page *page)
* it differentiates a memory hole from a page with no flags
*/
if (!page)
- return 1 << KPF_NOPAGE;
+ return BIT_ULL(KPF_NOPAGE);
snapshot_page(&ps, page);
folio = &ps.folio_snapshot;
@@ -170,11 +170,11 @@ u64 stable_page_flags(const struct page *page)
* pseudo flags for the well known (anonymous) memory mapped pages
*/
if (folio_mapped(folio))
- u |= 1 << KPF_MMAP;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_MMAP);
if (is_anon) {
- u |= 1 << KPF_ANON;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_ANON);
if ((mapping & FOLIO_MAPPING_FLAGS) == FOLIO_MAPPING_KSM)
- u |= 1 << KPF_KSM;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_KSM);
}
/*
@@ -184,35 +184,35 @@ u64 stable_page_flags(const struct page *page)
if (ps.idx == 0)
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_COMPOUND_HEAD, PG_head);
else
- u |= 1 << KPF_COMPOUND_TAIL;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_COMPOUND_TAIL);
if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio))
- u |= 1 << KPF_HUGE;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_HUGE);
else if (folio_test_large(folio) &&
folio_test_large_rmappable(folio)) {
/* Note: we indicate any THPs here, not just PMD-sized ones */
- u |= 1 << KPF_THP;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_THP);
} else if (is_huge_zero_pfn(ps.pfn)) {
- u |= 1 << KPF_ZERO_PAGE;
- u |= 1 << KPF_THP;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_ZERO_PAGE);
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_THP);
} else if (is_zero_pfn(ps.pfn)) {
- u |= 1 << KPF_ZERO_PAGE;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_ZERO_PAGE);
}
if (ps.flags & PAGE_SNAPSHOT_PG_BUDDY)
- u |= 1 << KPF_BUDDY;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_BUDDY);
if (folio_test_offline(folio))
- u |= 1 << KPF_OFFLINE;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_OFFLINE);
if (folio_test_pgtable(folio))
- u |= 1 << KPF_PGTABLE;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_PGTABLE);
if (folio_test_slab(folio))
- u |= 1 << KPF_SLAB;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_SLAB);
#if defined(CONFIG_PAGE_IDLE_FLAG) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_IDLE, PG_idle);
#else
if (ps.flags & PAGE_SNAPSHOT_PG_IDLE)
- u |= 1 << KPF_IDLE;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_IDLE);
#endif
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_LOCKED, PG_locked);
@@ -227,14 +227,14 @@ u64 stable_page_flags(const struct page *page)
#define SWAPCACHE ((1 << PG_swapbacked) | (1 << PG_swapcache))
if ((k & SWAPCACHE) == SWAPCACHE)
- u |= 1 << KPF_SWAPCACHE;
+ u |= BIT_ULL(KPF_SWAPCACHE);
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_SWAPBACKED, PG_swapbacked);
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_UNEVICTABLE, PG_unevictable);
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_MLOCKED, PG_mlocked);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
- if (u & (1 << KPF_HUGE))
+ if (u & BIT_ULL(KPF_HUGE))
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_HWPOISON, PG_hwpoison);
else
u |= kpf_copy_bit(ps.page_snapshot.flags.f, KPF_HWPOISON, PG_hwpoison);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 3:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] cleanup for stable_page_flags() Jinjiang Tu
2026-07-20 3:30 ` Jinjiang Tu [this message]
2026-07-20 3:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] fs: stable_page_flags(): use folio_test_*() helpers Jinjiang Tu
2026-07-20 9:30 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-20 3:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] fs: stable_page_flags(): simplify KPF_IDLE handling Jinjiang Tu
2026-07-20 9:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-20 5:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] cleanup for stable_page_flags() Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720033021.4091944-2-tujinjiang@huawei.com \
--to=tujinjiang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luizcap@redhat.com \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=svetly.todorov@memverge.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox