Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: pratmal@google.com
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_reporting: Add page_reporting_delay_ms sysctl
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:54:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722155402.f313e8a98615bd3b513221eb@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722211517.1898228-1-pratmal@google.com>

On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:15:17 +0000 pratmal@google.com wrote:

> From: Pratyush Mallick <pratmal@google.com>
> 
> Currently, the free page reporting daemon uses a hardcoded delay of
> (2 HZ) between reporting intervals. While this is a reasonable
> default, it lacks the flexibility to adapt to varying guest workloads.
> 
> A low delay allows aggressive memory reclamation, returning unused
> pages to the host as quickly as possible. However, during spiky
> allocation/free churn, this immediate reporting can lead to a severe
> performance penalty (nested page faults) as the guest re-allocates memory
> that the host has just unmapped. In these scenarios, there is benefit
> from increasing the delay to batch free pages over a longer window,
> absorbing the churn without hypercall and re-fault overhead.
> 
> This patch refactors the delay into a dynamically tunable sysctl,
> /proc/sys/vm/page_reporting_delay_ms, measured in milliseconds. The value
> defaults to 2000ms to precisely match the original (2 HZ) behavior.
> 

Seems reasonable.

> +The default value is 2000 (2 seconds). The minimum allowed value is
> +0 (immediate reporting) and the maximum allowed value is 10000 (10 seconds).

Why implement a max?  If setting it to something enormous causes bad
behavior then Don't Do That?



  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-22 21:15 [PATCH v2] mm/page_reporting: Add page_reporting_delay_ms sysctl pratmal
2026-07-22 22:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-07-23  0:06 ` SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260722155402.f313e8a98615bd3b513221eb@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=pratmal@google.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox