From: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
To: "Yanjun.Zhu" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
ajayachandra@nvidia.com, alex@shazbot.org, amastro@fb.com,
ankita@nvidia.com, apopple@nvidia.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
chrisl@kernel.org, christian.koenig@amd.com, corbet@lwn.net,
dmatlack@google.com, graf@amazon.com,
jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com, jgg@nvidia.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
jrhilke@google.com, julianr@linux.ibm.com, kees@kernel.org,
kevin.tian@intel.com, leon@kernel.org, leonro@nvidia.com,
lukas@wunner.de, mattev@meta.com, michal.winiarski@intel.com,
parav@nvidia.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, praan@google.com,
pratyush@kernel.org, rananta@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, rppt@kernel.org, saeedm@nvidia.com,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
skhawaja@google.com, vivek.kasireddy@intel.com, witu@nvidia.com,
yi.l.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/20] vfio: selftests: Add vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 23:02:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805055042.GA806762.vipinsh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0556e2fc-3be5-4023-a9a4-8482fa8c88b2@linux.dev>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 03:19:34PM -0700, Yanjun.Zhu wrote:
>
> On 7/14/26 8:15 AM, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> > Add a selftest to exercise preserving a vfio-pci device across a Live
> > Update. For now the test is extremely simple and just verifies that the
> > device file can be preserved and retrieved. In the future this test will
> > be extended to verify more parts about device preservation as they are
> > implemented.
> >
> > This test is added to TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED since it must be run
> > manually along with a kexec.
> >
> > To run this test manually:
> >
> > $ tools/testing/selftests/vfio/scripts/setup.sh 0000:00:04.0
> > $ tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test --stage 1 0000:00:04.0
> >
> > $ kexec ... # NOTE: Exact method will be distro-dependent
> >
> > $ tools/testing/selftests/vfio/scripts/setup.sh 0000:00:04.0
> > $ tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test --stage 2 0000:00:04.0
> Hi, Vipin
>
> Thanks a lot for your help. I followed your suggestion, vfio-pci setup can
> work.
I am glad your setup using virsh is working.
>
> The followings are the test result. In the step 3, after kexec, there are
> some fails. I am not sure if these are known problem or not.
>
> 1. Before kexec command
>
> + modprobe -v vfio-pci
> + tools/testing/selftests/vfio/scripts/setup.sh 0000:00:04.0
> + echo "vfio-pci" > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:04.0/driver_override
> + echo "0000:00:04.0" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/vfio-pci/bind
> + tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test --stage 1
> 0000:00:04.0
> Preserving device in session
> Preserving memfd of size 0x40100000 in session
> # [STAGE 1] Forking persistent child to hold sessions...
> # [STAGE 1] Child PID: 1236. Resources are pinned.
> # [STAGE 1] You may now perform kexec reboot.
> + set +x
>
> 2. Run kexec command
>
> 3. After kexec command
>
> + echo "vfio-pci" > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:04.0/driver_override
> + echo "0000:00:04.0" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/vfio-pci/bind
> Checking open(/dev/vfio/devices/vfio0) fails <--- I can confirm that the
> /dev/vfio/devices/vfio0 exists. But open this failed.
This is correct output. Test is verifying that open should fail. If it
didn't fail the ntest would have exited with an error. A preserved VFIO
FD can only be retrived using Live Update session ioctls and not through
usual VFIO dev path.
> Checking ioctl(group_fd, VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD, "0000:00:04.0") fails
> (vfio_type1_iommu) <--- fails
> Checking ioctl(group_fd, VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD, "0000:00:04.0") fails
> (vfio_type1v2_iommu). <--- fails
> Checking ioctl(group_fd, VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD, "0000:00:04.0") fails
> (iommufd_compat_type1) <--- fails
> Checking ioctl(group_fd, VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD, "0000:00:04.0") fails
> (iommufd_compat_type1v2). <--- fails
These are all correct output. Test is verifying that userspace should
not be able to get VFIO device FD only through Live Update session
ioctls and nothing else.
> Retrieving memfd from LUO
> Finishing the session before retrieving the device (should fail)
> Retrieving the device FD from LUO
> Finishing the session before binding to iommufd (should fail)
> Binding the device to an iommufd and setting it up
> Finishing the session
>
This is shows VFIO FD is successfully retrived by Live Update ioctl.
So, you saw expected output from successful test run. I will change
the message getting printed to avoid confusion. I think current way of
printing ".... fails" is confusing.
Thanks
Vipin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 15:14 [PATCH v5 00/20] vfio/pci: Base Live Update support for VFIO Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] vfio/pci: Factor out the reset logic in VFIO PCI device close path Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] vfio: Export various helpers from VFIO Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] vfio/pci: Export vfio_pci_dma_buf_move for vfio-pci module Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] liveupdate: Export symbols needed by modules Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] vfio/pci: Register a file handler with Live Update Orchestrator Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] vfio/pci: Preserve vfio-pci device files across Live Update Vipin Sharma
2026-07-21 23:16 ` Josh Hilke
2026-07-23 21:55 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] vfio: Introduce vfio_find_device() helper Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] vfio: Refactor vfio_device_fops_cdev_open() Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] vfio: Add API to open cdev device for Live Update restore Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] vfio/pci: Retrieve preserved device files after Live Update Vipin Sharma
2026-07-21 16:23 ` Josh Hilke
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] vfio: Enforce preserved devices are retrieved via LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] docs: liveupdate: Add documentation for VFIO PCI Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] vfio: selftests: Build liveupdate library in VFIO selftests Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] vfio: selftests: Add vfio_pci_liveupdate_uapi_test Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] vfio: selftests: Initialize vfio_pci_device using a VFIO cdev FD Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] vfio: selftests: Add Makefile support for TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] vfio: selftests: Add vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test Vipin Sharma
2026-07-27 0:40 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-07-28 5:34 ` Vipin Sharma
[not found] ` <0556e2fc-3be5-4023-a9a4-8482fa8c88b2@linux.dev>
2026-08-05 6:02 ` Vipin Sharma [this message]
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] vfio: selftests: Expose iommu_modes to tests Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] vfio: selftests: Verify that opening VFIO device fails during Live Update Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] vfio: selftests: Add continuous DMA to vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test Vipin Sharma
2026-07-16 23:24 ` [PATCH v5 00/20] vfio/pci: Base Live Update support for VFIO Yanjun.Zhu
2026-07-17 1:22 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-07-20 17:08 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-07-23 22:18 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-07-23 23:01 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-07-23 22:58 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-08-05 6:04 ` Vipin Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805055042.GA806762.vipinsh@google.com \
--to=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=ajayachandra@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=amastro@fb.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jrhilke@google.com \
--cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mattev@meta.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
--cc=witu@nvidia.com \
--cc=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox