Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
To: sj@kernel.org
Cc: aethernet65535@gmail.com, damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/damon: introduce damos_sort_type for re-ordering regions list
Date: Wed,  5 Aug 2026 16:12:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805081246.39417-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804135834.86511-1-sj@kernel.org>

Hi SJ,

First of all, I apologize for the noise, and I will drop this patch.
Secondly, thank you for pointing this out, it made me realize that I was
fixing a non-existent problem.

On Tue,  4 Aug 2026 06:58:33 -0700 SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:

> The recommended way is setting the min_age naive, and auto-tune it using DAMOS
> quota or aim-oriented quota auto-tuning.  Have you considered using that?

> This sounds like very similar to DAMOS quota's regions prioritizing mechanism.
> Have you considered using DAMOS quota?  If so, could you please add why
> proposing this new mechanism, with some comparisons?

Yes, I have. And you are right; the existing mechanism is better. I
wrote this patch because I misunderstood quota.min_score and did not
even check the implementation of damos_adjust_quota().

Whether when implementing dama [1] or this damos_sort_type, I failed to
realize that min_age might not be such an important parameter on a
long-running system, and there is really no need to introduce
auto-tuning or a new mechanism for it.

> I to be honest feel this is too much for "just guess" based patch.  I'd like to
> get clear reasoning of the change and/or test results before reviewing the
> code.  So I'm holding the code review until the high level discussion is done.

Moving forward, I will ensure I am not "reinventing the wheel" or
"fixing non-existent problem".

Thank you again for pointing this out. In the future contributions, I
will try my best to avoid spending time fixing problems that do not
actually exist.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/damon/20260628085155.20828-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com

Best regards,
Rui Yan


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260804100719.116538-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com>
2026-08-04 13:58 ` [RFC PATCH] mm/damon: introduce damos_sort_type for re-ordering regions list SJ Park
2026-08-05  8:12   ` Liew Rui Yan [this message]
2026-08-05 13:51     ` SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260805081246.39417-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --to=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox