From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: vernon2gm@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
ljs@kernel.org, nico.pache@linux.dev, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev,
zokeefe@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 02:16:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260815181632.21453-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815174444.4164-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
+Cc Baolin
On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 01:44:44AM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>
>On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 01:19:21PM +0800, Vernon Yang wrote:
>>From: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
>>
>>The khugepaged tracepoints take a folio pointer and call folio_pfn(),
>>but by then the folio may no longer be valid: freed after folio_put(),
>>folio_unlock() or pte_unmap_unlock(), or not a folio at all but an
>>xarray-encoded swap entry. On classic SPARSEMEM, dereferencing it oopses
>>khugepaged as soon as the trace event is enabled; on other memory models
>>it merely prints a bogus pfn.
>>
>>Pass the pfn to the tracepoints directly, captured while the folio is
>>still pinned, closing the use-after-free windows in
>>mm_khugepaged_scan_file(), mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd() and
>>mm_khugepaged_collapse_file().
>
>Well spotted!
>
>Gave the series a run on x86_64 (KVM), all good (only classic SPARSEMEM
>untested) :)
Hmm ... stumbled over something else while testing this ...
With tmpfs mounted huge=advise, one MADV_HUGEPAGE isn't enough to get
an unregistered mm onto khugepaged's list. Do it twice, and khugepaged
starts scanning right away.
The pending flags make it into khugepaged just fine:
int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
vm_flags_t *vm_flags, int advice)
{
switch (advice) {
case MADV_HUGEPAGE:
*vm_flags &= ~VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
*vm_flags |= VM_HUGEPAGE;
...
khugepaged_enter_vma(vma, *vm_flags);
break;
...
}
return 0;
}
and survive the common eligibility check:
unsigned long __thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
vm_flags_t vm_flags,
enum tva_type type,
unsigned long orders)
{
...
/*
* Enabled via shmem mount options or sysfs settings.
* Must be done before hugepage flags check since shmem has its
* own flags.
*/
if (!in_pf && shmem_file(vma->vm_file))
return orders & shmem_allowable_huge_orders(file_inode(vma->vm_file),
vma, vma_start_pgoff(vma), 0,
forced_collapse);
...
}
But then the shmem helper reads them back from the VMA:
unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t index,
loff_t write_end, bool shmem_huge_force)
{
...
vm_flags_t vm_flags = vma ? vma->vm_flags : 0;
...
}
At that point vma->vm_flags still has the old value, so huge=advise
quietly gives us no allowable order.
First madvise still succeeds, of course. The second one works because it
finds VM_HUGEPAGE already installed by the first call.
Looked at history too ... we've been here before. 2cf1338454a8 ("mm: fix
khugepaged with shmem_enabled=advise") fixed this exact ordering bug and
tagged cd89fb065099 as the culprit. Then 6beeab870e70 was meant to be
"No functional changes", but moving shmem_huge_global_enabled() into
shmem_allowable_huge_orders() seems to have wired the stale vma->vm_flags
read back in.
So AFAICT, this regressed in v6.12 with 6beeab870e70.
@Baolin, does that ring a bell? Any reason shmem_allowable_huge_orders()
can't just take the pending vm_flags as well?
Cheers, Lance
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-15 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-15 5:19 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: khugepaged: fix swap entry value to folio_pfn() Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: khugepaged: fix folio is used after pte_unmap_unlock() Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: khugepaged: fix folio is used after folio_put/unlock() Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF Lance Yang
2026-08-15 18:16 ` Lance Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260815181632.21453-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox