Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: vernon2gm@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
	ljs@kernel.org, nico.pache@linux.dev, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev,
	zokeefe@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 02:16:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260815181632.21453-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815174444.4164-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>

+Cc Baolin

On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 01:44:44AM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>
>On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 01:19:21PM +0800, Vernon Yang wrote:
>>From: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@kylinos.cn>
>>
>>The khugepaged tracepoints take a folio pointer and call folio_pfn(),
>>but by then the folio may no longer be valid: freed after folio_put(),
>>folio_unlock() or pte_unmap_unlock(), or not a folio at all but an
>>xarray-encoded swap entry. On classic SPARSEMEM, dereferencing it oopses
>>khugepaged as soon as the trace event is enabled; on other memory models
>>it merely prints a bogus pfn.
>>
>>Pass the pfn to the tracepoints directly, captured while the folio is
>>still pinned, closing the use-after-free windows in
>>mm_khugepaged_scan_file(), mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd() and
>>mm_khugepaged_collapse_file().
>
>Well spotted!
>
>Gave the series a run on x86_64 (KVM), all good (only classic SPARSEMEM
>untested) :)

Hmm ... stumbled over something else while testing this ...

With tmpfs mounted huge=advise, one MADV_HUGEPAGE isn't enough to get
an unregistered mm onto khugepaged's list. Do it twice, and khugepaged
starts scanning right away.

The pending flags make it into khugepaged just fine:

int hugepage_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
		     vm_flags_t *vm_flags, int advice)
{
	switch (advice) {
	case MADV_HUGEPAGE:
		*vm_flags &= ~VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
		*vm_flags |= VM_HUGEPAGE;
...
		khugepaged_enter_vma(vma, *vm_flags);
		break;
...
	}

	return 0;
}

and survive the common eligibility check:

unsigned long __thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
					 vm_flags_t vm_flags,
					 enum tva_type type,
					 unsigned long orders)
{
...
	/*
	 * Enabled via shmem mount options or sysfs settings.
	 * Must be done before hugepage flags check since shmem has its
	 * own flags.
	 */
	if (!in_pf && shmem_file(vma->vm_file))
		return orders & shmem_allowable_huge_orders(file_inode(vma->vm_file),
						   vma, vma_start_pgoff(vma), 0,
						   forced_collapse);
...
}

But then the shmem helper reads them back from the VMA:

unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
				struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgoff_t index,
				loff_t write_end, bool shmem_huge_force)
{
...
	vm_flags_t vm_flags = vma ? vma->vm_flags : 0;
...
}

At that point vma->vm_flags still has the old value, so huge=advise
quietly gives us no allowable order.

First madvise still succeeds, of course. The second one works because it
finds VM_HUGEPAGE already installed by the first call.

Looked at history too ... we've been here before. 2cf1338454a8 ("mm: fix
khugepaged with shmem_enabled=advise") fixed this exact ordering bug and
tagged cd89fb065099 as the culprit. Then 6beeab870e70 was meant to be
"No functional changes", but moving shmem_huge_global_enabled() into
shmem_allowable_huge_orders() seems to have wired the stale vma->vm_flags
read back in.

So AFAICT, this regressed in v6.12 with 6beeab870e70.

@Baolin, does that ring a bell? Any reason shmem_allowable_huge_orders()
can't just take the pending vm_flags as well?

Cheers, Lance


      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-15 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-15  5:19 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF Vernon Yang
2026-08-15  5:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: khugepaged: fix swap entry value to folio_pfn() Vernon Yang
2026-08-15  5:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: khugepaged: fix folio is used after pte_unmap_unlock() Vernon Yang
2026-08-15  5:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: khugepaged: fix folio is used after folio_put/unlock() Vernon Yang
2026-08-15 17:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: khugepaged: fix tracepoint UAF Lance Yang
2026-08-15 18:16   ` Lance Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260815181632.21453-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
    --cc=zokeefe@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox