From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C77AC5DF7D for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 466AB6B018D; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:25:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4172E6B0191; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:25:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 357FB6B07B5; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:25:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165706B018D for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:25:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F94C02BE for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:25:10 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 85114612380.22.2F1B907 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (unirelay07 [10.200.18.70]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF6440004 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf27.hostedemail.com; none ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; cv=none; t=1787063108; b=MHauh7hUTEPYtHoTUh26uNC63XfjyK/M5WpEQj33BV3NL1/Cs2j83SWo/0o2td4DxBT78b ngXZJSoNHncIw0ncL/VtLvNS9nzZwasLvPQCWHxntr3IHQ9Bar1x776OHFj2Ii8X/tOqQH sAKvuZnxyjHqZQUQLsJTLt/huiDF8qw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf27.hostedemail.com; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1787063108; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=E5/rGVzlBcnqQpnTv5+IlQUiwRUmnA0eNZNFu07RT0g=; b=BkwgclC2WEY0xF3w26evIn7i7C/CJu6CJCy0vjrKO5sV5O2lh75xBsiozUazV8UdYDEDYy VTG4f2RBS0rDVxnQN12CwjDJ9QpDZFdRUc6PRLiKkqEt4cmWI1k1/LdXhqvKCBsbVxH3Ps 64s6h37+L+uglsv8YmhWv2ONiBE50d4= Received: from omf09.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FB1160279; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1F44720028; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:24:56 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: =?UTF-8?B?6auY57+U?= Cc: Xiang Gao , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lorenzo Stoakes , gao xu , =?UTF-8?B?5Y2w6Zev?= , "linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: [External Mail]Re: [RFC] tracing: aggregate ring-buffer usage statistics Message-ID: <20260818102456.03f52b8f@robin> In-Reply-To: <11242d2e40eb4fd4b439ac66ebbe26ed@xiaomi.com> References: <20260811114818.1449933-1-gaoxiang17@xiaomi.com> <20260811100830.7976bbe8@gandalf.local.home> <20260812114704.2f61bc5a@gandalf.local.home> <0e42953988164786aafe175ef0f4e745@xiaomi.com> <11242d2e40eb4fd4b439ac66ebbe26ed@xiaomi.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX18HcnJ66CNnHw+pNMNxXyVfBT9aUSk6dI0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=goodmis.org; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim1; bh=E5/rGVzlBcnqQpnTv5+IlQUiwRUmnA0eNZNFu07RT0g=; b=pcx/LIHkxu0dCkt1AI/WVyNjJ8VXYVGo8ykVn0ey5hjtthg0MkTrRYIH6uDDJxQcoX8FfbLii8T3kNJApi2+JJDryyNgmzE6iLw04cI5g/aVEtAFiOampkXLAHPHxiBnPtoJTFFrEvE3MKj7FZTw9z3dppi19WMOIKdaVh7TG4s= X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX19kUE2e7JTYzjcyI5IvKIsVRELHE9ewQ+N343pZipCABDOGQz64cQSxwJ4o2fcR6NWOhHoFj+3b6ozab+17Hu8SayjboJSOAnWDSqwUmxkwycjgHBKUCFaRikeY10PNzAW018wJCNoXbtC5G12ud8WH86ZNmPz0WCU8O/7pkqTg1ZGo3d21/aj1z0hDx0vfnzZZo660/+kjgoaAxJrlJsXY3NNWaH10bv+fRBHuPtNrSAxKqPRiKK9xlswp41YH6jaSDj0fbITYLx2adfbbA1Pr7CVj5/L3nEknweLaIWByM38VU+B0m2h4xj6ejmIULnwi+hlvWu1piRLGLb0T0Bwa X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CBF6440004 X-Stat-Signature: 9zprk6udzdaksuhwujqxs1tos18bd7xf X-HE-Tag-Orig: 1787063104-385141 X-HE-Tag: 1787063108-534809 X-HE-Meta: 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 ulSKyUnZ xoo2Vcrmmme1K6Ze5ejOPFhmd68jkxy43Fee+aBWqntulMcTetSp1baJd2M7w3OSV68yHNalBhO0kH44aWZvuroKIrg7A7LHDiaJlBKgcBUwsFx1nv8bl67LlVPDnRy1uxJXebF68JuGvJ+8MUBNs8rj5w6vyE2kl+Kz1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:30:26 +0000 =E9=AB=98=E7=BF=94 wrote: > Hi Steve, >=20 >=20 > Just a gentle ping. I have the RFC patch ready for > trace_stats/total_memory_kb, with the buffers_mem and > snapshot_buffers_mem breakdown. >=20 >=20 > Would you prefer I post the RFC patch for review, or is there anything > you would like to clarify about the accounting scope first? I'm traveling this week. Can you send another RFC next week. Thanks, -- Steve