Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/vmscan: drop the combined limit gate in __node_reclaim()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 16:17:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821081741.1340277-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821081741.1340277-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev>

From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>

__node_reclaim() only ran shrink_node() when unmapped page cache was
over min_unmapped_pages OR reclaimable slab was over min_slab_pages.

With slab and file reclaim now gated per type by sc->skip_slab_reclaim and
sc->skip_file_reclaim, this combined gate is either redundant or harmful:

 - for the NUMA node reclaim caller it is always true, since
   node_reclaim() only calls in when at least one limit is exceeded;

 - for the per-node proactive reclaim caller (which does not go through
   node_reclaim()'s checks) it wrongly suppressed all reclaim -- anon
   included -- whenever both page cache and slab happened to sit at or
   below their limits, even with plenty of reclaimable anon present.

Drop the gate and let the per-type flags decide what to reclaim.  The
node reclaim path is unchanged; the proactive path can now reclaim anon
as requested.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 1e56973ceb73..5a3f67b3ba32 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -7906,16 +7906,16 @@ static unsigned long __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
 	noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
 	set_task_reclaim_state(p, &sc->reclaim_state);
 
-	if (node_pagecache_reclaimable(pgdat) > pgdat->min_unmapped_pages ||
-	    node_page_state_pages(pgdat, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) > pgdat->min_slab_pages) {
-		/*
-		 * Free memory by calling shrink node with increasing
-		 * priorities until we have enough memory freed.
-		 */
-		do {
-			shrink_node(pgdat, sc);
-		} while (sc->nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc->priority >= 0);
-	}
+	/*
+	 * Free memory by calling shrink node with increasing
+	 * priorities until we have enough memory freed.
+	 *
+	 * What to reclaim is gated per type by sc->skip_slab_reclaim and
+	 * sc->skip_file_reclaim.
+	 */
+	do {
+		shrink_node(pgdat, sc);
+	} while (sc->nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc->priority >= 0);
 
 	set_task_reclaim_state(p, NULL);
 	memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21  8:17 [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: honour node reclaim limits per type Ridong Chen
2026-08-21  8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm/vmscan: only reclaim slab in node reclaim when over min_slab_pages Ridong Chen
2026-08-21  8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/vmscan: only reclaim file pages in node reclaim when over min_unmapped_pages Ridong Chen
2026-08-21  8:17 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-08-21 12:49   ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/vmscan: drop the combined limit gate in __node_reclaim() Johannes Weiner
2026-08-21  8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm/vmscan: do not skip node reclaim when only anon is reclaimable Ridong Chen
2026-08-21  8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: honour node reclaim limits per type Michal Hocko
2026-08-21  8:58   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-21  9:21     ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-21 11:16       ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-21 11:26         ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-21 13:43           ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-21  9:07   ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-21  9:24     ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-21 10:52       ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-21 11:02         ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-21 11:10           ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-21 11:20             ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260821081741.1340277-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox