Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, damon@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/damon: fix damos quota walk-position tracking
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 07:05:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826140508.74447-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826102413.8466-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com>

On Wed, 26 Aug 2026 18:24:13 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 06:54:57 -0700 SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 20:46:16 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > DAMOS uses charge_target_from/charge_addr_from to remember how far a
> > > quota-limited walk has progressed.  The current implementation has two
> > > problems:
> > > 
> > > 1. Once set, the cursor unconditionally skips and resets at the last
> > >    region of the tracked target, so the last region can be skipped even
> > >    when it has not been processed.
> > 
> > I don't fully understand this.  Could you please clarify more?  Maybe adding a
> > realistic example scenario would be helpful.
> > 
> 
> Problem: Unconditional skip of the last region
> 
> In the current damos_skip_charged_region(), there is this logic:
> 
>     if (r == damon_last_region(t)) {
>         quota->charge_target_from = NULL;
>         quota->charge_addr_from = 0;
>         return true; /* Skip */
>     }
> 
> Scenario:
> 1. Target has 2 regions: R1 (0-100 bytes) and R2 (100-200 bytes).
> 
> 2. Quota is configured to process only 50 bytes per window.
> 
> 3. Window 1: Processes R1 (0-50).  Quota is full.  Cursor is saved at
>    (Target, 50).
> 
> 4. Window 2: Skips R1 (0-50).  Processes R1 (50-100).  Quota is full.
>    Cursor is saved at (Target, 100), which is exactly the start of R2.
> 
> 5. Window 3: The loop reaches R2.  Because R2 is damon_last_region(t),
>    the old code unconditionally returns true, skipping R2 entirely and
>    resetting the cursor.
> 
> Result: R2 is permanently skipped even though it has never been
> processed.

Ok, makes sense.  The user impact should be not that big, though.

> 
> To fix this, the patch advances the cursor every time a region is
> walked, regardless of whether it is applied or filtered out.  This
> allows DAMON to accurately track whether the last region has already
> been visited, eliminating the need for the unconditional reset.

Sounds like a big change compared to the problem.  Why we cannot modify the
last region case?  Have you also considered other possible simpler approaches?

> 
> > > 
> > > 2. The cursor only advances when the quota becomes full.  Regions that
> > >    are filtered out do not move the cursor, and the scheme can remain
> > >    stuck on the same regions.
> > 
> > I don't fully understand this, either.  Could you pleae clarify more?
> > 
> 
> Problem 2 is a false positive.  As long as the quota is not full, DAMON
> will continue iterating to find applicable regions.  I mistakenly
> assumed in the commit message that encountering filtered-out or invalid
> regions would cause the cursor to stall.

Thank you for clarifying.  Please try to reduce this kind of false positives
from the next time.

> 
> This patch ensures that every target is traversed sequentially and
> deterministically, even when the quota is set very low.  I omitted this
> benefit in the initial problem description.  If you think it is okay, I
> will add it in the next revision.

What's the problem and benefit?  I still don't get it.  More clarification
would be nice.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-26 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25 12:46 [RFC PATCH] mm/damon: fix damos quota walk-position tracking Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-25 13:54 ` SJ Park
2026-08-26 10:24   ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-26 14:05     ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-08-27  0:44       ` SJ Park
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-27  5:54 Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-27  6:02 ` Liew Rui Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260826140508.74447-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox