From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, damon@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/damon: fix damos quota walk-position tracking
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 07:05:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826140508.74447-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826102413.8466-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com>
On Wed, 26 Aug 2026 18:24:13 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 06:54:57 -0700 SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 20:46:16 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > DAMOS uses charge_target_from/charge_addr_from to remember how far a
> > > quota-limited walk has progressed. The current implementation has two
> > > problems:
> > >
> > > 1. Once set, the cursor unconditionally skips and resets at the last
> > > region of the tracked target, so the last region can be skipped even
> > > when it has not been processed.
> >
> > I don't fully understand this. Could you please clarify more? Maybe adding a
> > realistic example scenario would be helpful.
> >
>
> Problem: Unconditional skip of the last region
>
> In the current damos_skip_charged_region(), there is this logic:
>
> if (r == damon_last_region(t)) {
> quota->charge_target_from = NULL;
> quota->charge_addr_from = 0;
> return true; /* Skip */
> }
>
> Scenario:
> 1. Target has 2 regions: R1 (0-100 bytes) and R2 (100-200 bytes).
>
> 2. Quota is configured to process only 50 bytes per window.
>
> 3. Window 1: Processes R1 (0-50). Quota is full. Cursor is saved at
> (Target, 50).
>
> 4. Window 2: Skips R1 (0-50). Processes R1 (50-100). Quota is full.
> Cursor is saved at (Target, 100), which is exactly the start of R2.
>
> 5. Window 3: The loop reaches R2. Because R2 is damon_last_region(t),
> the old code unconditionally returns true, skipping R2 entirely and
> resetting the cursor.
>
> Result: R2 is permanently skipped even though it has never been
> processed.
Ok, makes sense. The user impact should be not that big, though.
>
> To fix this, the patch advances the cursor every time a region is
> walked, regardless of whether it is applied or filtered out. This
> allows DAMON to accurately track whether the last region has already
> been visited, eliminating the need for the unconditional reset.
Sounds like a big change compared to the problem. Why we cannot modify the
last region case? Have you also considered other possible simpler approaches?
>
> > >
> > > 2. The cursor only advances when the quota becomes full. Regions that
> > > are filtered out do not move the cursor, and the scheme can remain
> > > stuck on the same regions.
> >
> > I don't fully understand this, either. Could you pleae clarify more?
> >
>
> Problem 2 is a false positive. As long as the quota is not full, DAMON
> will continue iterating to find applicable regions. I mistakenly
> assumed in the commit message that encountering filtered-out or invalid
> regions would cause the cursor to stall.
Thank you for clarifying. Please try to reduce this kind of false positives
from the next time.
>
> This patch ensures that every target is traversed sequentially and
> deterministically, even when the quota is set very low. I omitted this
> benefit in the initial problem description. If you think it is okay, I
> will add it in the next revision.
What's the problem and benefit? I still don't get it. More clarification
would be nice.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-25 12:46 [RFC PATCH] mm/damon: fix damos quota walk-position tracking Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-25 13:54 ` SJ Park
2026-08-26 10:24 ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-26 14:05 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-08-27 0:44 ` SJ Park
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-27 5:54 Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-27 6:02 ` Liew Rui Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260826140508.74447-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox