From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: "Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm/mlock: use the IRQ-safe accessor for NR_MLOCK in __munlock_folio()
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 11:01:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901180109.3797944-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> (raw)
NR_MLOCK is updated from interrupt context. __free_pages_prepare() clears
a stray PG_mlocked and adjusts NR_MLOCK, and a folio can reach it with the
flag still set from a bio completion handler:
__free_pages_ok+0x6af/0x7a0
<IRQ>
__bio_release_pages+0xde/0x260
__iomap_dio_bio_end_io+0x16e/0x1a0
blk_update_request+0x14b/0x3d0
blk_mq_end_request+0x18/0x30
blk_done_softirq+0x49/0x60
The folio gets there like this. A MAP_SHARED file mapping is mlocked, so
its page cache folios carry PG_mlocked, and an O_DIRECT write sourced from
that mapping GUP-pins those same folios. munlock() then runs
mlock_vma_pages_range(), which clears VM_LOCKED before walking the page
tables to munlock each folio. A concurrent hole punch reaches the folio
through the rmap (i_mmap_rwsem, not mmap_lock) and can land inside that
window: __folio_remove_rmap() -> munlock_vma_folio() sees VM_LOCKED
already clear, so it neither queues the folio on the mlock batch nor takes
a reference, and the pte it clears makes the pending mlock_pte_range()
walk skip the folio at its !pte_present() check. filemap_remove_folio()
then drops the page cache reference, leaving the bio's pin as the last
one, released from the completion handler above.
So __zone_stat_mod_folio() here needs interrupts disabled, not merely
preemption, and __munlock_folio() has a path where they are not: when the
folio has already been taken off the LRU by somebody else the function
jumps straight to the counter update without taking the lruvec lock. The
read-modify-write of the per-CPU NR_MLOCK diff can then be interrupted by
the softirq above, and one of the two decrements is lost, leaving Mlocked
in /proc/meminfo permanently overstated.
Use zone_stat_mod_folio(). mod_zone_state()'s this_cpu_try_cmpxchg() is
atomic against a same-CPU interrupt and retries, and on the path where the
lruvec lock is held its cost is negligible next to the lock itself.
The UNEVICTABLE_PG* events are deliberately left on the __ accessors:
they occupy different vm_event_states slots from the UNEVICTABLE_PGCLEARED
that __free_pages_prepare() bumps, and nothing updates those two from
interrupt context.
Fixes: 2fbb0c10d1e8 ("mm/munlock: mlock_page() munlock_page() batch by pagevec")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
---
mm/mlock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index efa6716e4dfb..39215a3eab1f 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static struct lruvec *__munlock_folio(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec *lruvec
munlock:
if (folio_test_clear_mlocked(folio)) {
- __zone_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_MLOCK, -nr_pages);
+ zone_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_MLOCK, -nr_pages);
if (isolated || !folio_test_unevictable(folio))
__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGMUNLOCKED, nr_pages);
else
--
2.53.0-Meta
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 18:01 Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-09-02 1:27 ` [PATCH] mm/mlock: use the IRQ-safe accessor for NR_MLOCK in __munlock_folio() Hugh Dickins
2026-09-02 16:45 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901180109.3797944-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox