Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cen Zhang (Microsoft)" <cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com,
	tgopinath@linux.microsoft.com,
	Cen Zhang <cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH] userfaultfd: fix UFFDIO_MOVE livelock on large folio with extra references
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 16:15:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261012201514.97015-1-cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)

To move one page out of a large folio, move_pages_ptes() first has to
split the folio.  __folio_split() refuses if the folio has any
reference beyond its page table mappings and the caller's own, and it
reports the refusal as -EAGAIN.  move_pages() treats returned -EAGAIN
as a transient race and keeps retrying the same address, holding the VMA
read locks the whole time.  This is incorrect since in some cases
userspace can hold such a reference indefinitely, such as by
registering the page as an io_uring buffer.

An unprivileged user can trigger this with three threads: first holds
such a reference on a page of a THP, second calls UFFDIO_MOVE on another
page of the same THP and spins in the kernel forever holding the VMA
read locks, and third calls fork() or mprotect(), which takes mmap_lock
for writing and then waits forever for those read locks.  From then on
every mmap_lock user of that mm hangs, including other processes
inspecting it through /proc/<pid>/, until the process is SIGKILLed.
The hung task detector reports the blocked tasks (third one), and with
kernel.hung_task_panic=1 the machine panics:

  INFO: task wedge:95 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
  task:wedge  state:D stack:12528 pid:95 tgid:95 ppid:94
  Call Trace:
   __schedule+0x596/0x1110
   schedule+0x36/0xf0
   __vma_start_exclude_readers+0x100/0x170
   __vma_start_write+0x51/0xd0
   __split_vma+0x208/0x3d0
   vma_modify+0x6a8/0x840
   vma_modify_flags+0xce/0x110
   mprotect_fixup+0xbe/0x480
   do_mprotect_pkey+0x2d9/0x580
   __x64_sys_mprotect+0x1a/0x30

Fix by returning -EBUSY instead of -EAGAIN in move_pages_ptes(), the
caller of split_folio(), when the split fails. Thus, move_pages()
does not retry -EBUSY and the ioctl drops its locks and returns to
userspace instead of spinning.

Fixes: adef440691ba ("userfaultfd: UFFDIO_MOVE uABI")
Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang (Microsoft) <cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com>
---
 mm/userfaultfd.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
index 74f04c323c50..500962be1162 100644
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1663,8 +1663,12 @@ static long move_pages_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *dst_pmd, pmd_t *src_pmd
 			pte_unmap(dst_pte);
 			src_pte = dst_pte = NULL;
 			ret = split_folio(src_folio);
-			if (ret)
+			if (ret) {
+				/* do not retry, extra refs may be held forever */
+				if (ret == -EAGAIN)
+					ret = -EBUSY;
 				goto out;
+			}
 			/* have to reacquire the folio after it got split */
 			folio_unlock(src_folio);
 			folio_put(src_folio);
-- 
2.55.0



             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 20:15 Cen Zhang (Microsoft) [this message]
2026-10-13 14:46 ` [PATCH] userfaultfd: fix UFFDIO_MOVE livelock on large folio with extra references David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261012201514.97015-1-cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=cenzhang@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tgopinath@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox