From: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kasong@tencent.com,
qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, baohua@kernel.org,
axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
baoquan.he@linux.dev, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org,
vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] mm/mglru: avoid redundant rotations of young memcgs
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 22:54:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261012205447.2717801-5-max.kellermann@ionos.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012205447.2717801-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Concurrent reclaimers can request promotion after another reclaimer
has already moved a memcg into the young generation. Requeueing it
into a random bin again adds list mutations without advancing the
old-generation scan.
Therefore, skip `MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG` when the memcg is already in the
default segment of the current young generation.
In my micro benchmark, this increases the request rate by 36% and
reduces the average duration of each write request by 27%.
Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 69976df5d537..922c59eb9629 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4445,6 +4445,14 @@ static void lru_gen_rotate_memcg(struct lruvec *lruvec, int op)
else
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
+ if (op == MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG && old == new && lruvec->lrugen.seg == seg)
+ /*
+ * This memcg is already in the young generation and
+ * reshuffling it again cannot help the scan of the
+ * old generation.
+ */
+ goto unlock;
+
WRITE_ONCE(lruvec->lrugen.seg, seg);
WRITE_ONCE(lruvec->lrugen.gen, new);
@@ -4458,6 +4466,7 @@ static void lru_gen_rotate_memcg(struct lruvec *lruvec, int op)
if (!pgdat->memcg_lru.nr_memcgs[old] && old == get_memcg_gen(pgdat->memcg_lru.seq))
WRITE_ONCE(pgdat->memcg_lru.seq, pgdat->memcg_lru.seq + 1);
+unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgdat->memcg_lru.lock, flags);
}
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 20:54 [PATCH 0/5] mm: multi-gen LRU: reduce memcg rotation overhead Max Kellermann
2026-10-12 20:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] include/linux/rculist_nulls: add hlist_nulls_add_behind_rcu() Max Kellermann
2026-10-12 20:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/vmscan: move code to lru_gen_{add,del}_memcg() Max Kellermann
2026-10-12 20:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/mglru: cache the last memcg node, make tail insertion constant time Max Kellermann
2026-10-12 20:54 ` Max Kellermann [this message]
2026-10-12 20:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/mglru: reschedule between memcg reclaim attempts Max Kellermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261012205447.2717801-5-max.kellermann@ionos.com \
--to=max.kellermann@ionos.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox