From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
To: "Gregory Price (Meta)" <gourry@gourry.net>
Cc: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kasong@tencent.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
baohua@kernel.org, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com,
weixugc@google.com, baoquan.he@linux.dev,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
david@kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
dave@stgolabs.net, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Kunwu Chan <chentao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: reclaim every zone in per-node proactive reclaim
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 23:19:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020151931.885951-1-kunwu.chan@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019185002.3428594-1-gourry@gourry.net>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 14:50:02 -0400 "Gregory Price (Meta)" <gourry@gourry.net> wrote:
> user_proactive_reclaim() limits per-node reclaim to
> gfp_zone(GFP_KERNEL), which is ZONE_NORMAL. Proactive reclaim serves no
> allocation, but that limit makes shrink_node() skip every ZONE_MOVABLE
> folio, so writing to /sys/devices/system/node/nodeN/reclaim never
> reclaims a node's movable memory. A movable-only node, such as dax/kmem
> or hotplugged memory onlined movable, reclaims nothing and fails with
> -EAGAIN.
>
> To reproduce, fill a movable-only node with clean page cache and write
> 200M to its nodeN/reclaim: the write fails with -EAGAIN and the page
> cache stays. The same write to a ZONE_NORMAL node frees 200MB.
>
> Scan every zone, as memory.reclaim does.
>
> Fixes: b980077899ea4 ("mm: introduce per-node proactive reclaim interface")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price (Meta) <gourry@gourry.net>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index e82ba737c028d..90f7a7bf4e426 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -8180,7 +8180,7 @@ int user_proactive_reclaim(char *buf,
> } else {
> struct scan_control sc = {
> .gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask),
> - .reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
> + .reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
> .proactive_swappiness = swappiness == -1 ? NULL : &swappiness,
> .priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
> .may_writepage = 1,
> --
> 2.53.0-Meta
>
>
reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1 is the right fix — proactive reclaim
isn't serving an allocation, so gfp_zone(GFP_KERNEL) needlessly caps
the scan. GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE would also work for the node path
via gfp_zone(), but that's indirect.
Reviewed-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@kylinos.cn>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 18:50 [PATCH] mm/vmscan: reclaim every zone in per-node proactive reclaim Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-19 20:14 ` Barry Song
2026-10-19 20:16 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-10-19 20:51 ` Harry Yoo
2026-10-19 22:06 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-19 22:52 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-10-20 0:36 ` SJ Park
2026-10-20 1:49 ` Balbir Singh
2026-10-20 3:04 ` Gregory Price
2026-10-20 7:49 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-20 15:19 ` Kunwu Chan [this message]
2026-10-20 16:59 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261020151931.885951-1-kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--to=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=chentao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox