Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] memcg: reduce cacheline contention from lruvec stat
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 15:54:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261023155407.0b519a3da7313137a0276119@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023195417.1391216-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com>

On Fri, 23 Oct 2026 12:54:15 -0700 Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> wrote:

> Memcg lruvec stat updates read fields of struct mem_cgroup_per_node and struct
> lruvec that can share a 128-byte cacheline pair with lines the lru_lock holder
> writes constantly (the LRU list heads, lru_lock or lru_zone_size[]), depending
> on where struct mem_cgroup_per_node lands in its slab. On CPUs that do spatial
> prefetching (eg Intel CPUs), this makes the stat updates contend with the
> lru_lock holder.
> 
> Patch 1 rearranges struct mem_cgroup_per_node so that its read-mostly line is
> paired with a cold line, and patch 2 makes the folio and kmem stat updates use
> the memcg and node they already know instead of going through the lruvec,
> whose pgdat field shares a cacheline pair with lru_lock or lru_zone_size[].
> 
> Results on a 2-socket Skylake (80 CPUs), average pages per second for
> threads faulting in and freeing memory in a single memcg:
> 
> 	   base     patch 1   patch 1+2 
> shmem, 20 threads  4.74M    5.59M     5.77M
> shmem, 80 threads  7.94M    8.66M     8.82M
> anon,  20 threads  3.04M    3.08M     3.10M

Thanks.  A local AI review pointed out a thing:

  One limitation worth mentioning in the [1/2] changelog: the slab
  uses SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, which need not align each object to a
  128-byte boundary.  If an object starts 64 bytes into such a pair,
  its first line can still be paired with the end of the preceding
  object rather than its own cold line.  This isn't a correctness
  issue, and the measured Skylake improvement may well be real, but the
  layout doesn't guarantee that every read-mostly line pairs with a
  cold line.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-23 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-23 19:54 [PATCH v3 0/2] memcg: reduce cacheline contention from lruvec stat Joanne Koong
2026-10-23 19:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] memcg: reduce cacheline contention between lruvec stat updates and LRU lists Joanne Koong
2026-10-26  9:29   ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-23 19:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] memcg: don't go through the lruvec for folio and kmem lruvec stat updates Joanne Koong
2026-10-26  9:38   ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-23 22:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-10-27 22:57   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] memcg: reduce cacheline contention from lruvec stat Joanne Koong
2026-10-28  2:24     ` Andrew Morton
2026-10-28 18:33       ` Joanne Koong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261023155407.0b519a3da7313137a0276119@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox