From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA04F606A31A for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=sina.com header.i=@sina.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201208 header.b=Iu916t/g Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B648F6B00D5; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:14:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B15066B0195; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:14:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A08486B0562; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:14:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC166B00D5 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:14:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFD8A02EB for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:14:20 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 85357109880.12.0CDF9E4 Received: from r3-22.sinamail.sina.com.cn (r3-22.sinamail.sina.com.cn [202.108.3.22]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400CF100006 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 10:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=sina.com header.s=201208 header.b="Iu916t/g"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=sina.com; spf=pass (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of hdanton@sina.com designates 202.108.3.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hdanton@sina.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1792836859; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=mHWFq5avGv6klXPzFSL6fYOnL7TOVnTa30eJ0p38zXo=; b=dMdw1hNe2KhcuiGTm56WpMtVxvaj9CZS9Xf/ajlPeVepo77Vm8DpyflBKtYpejrWgOslDU j2S/sp8eNXmY5VbCY/Y1BdlFLAy1m+ms23oz5Paii5d6K78auvnsyP5awtervB3oE9Rdg9 bbMHcvv4d53KLQsaWzMaUwh4tnLEilM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=sina.com header.s=201208 header.b="Iu916t/g"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=sina.com; spf=pass (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of hdanton@sina.com designates 202.108.3.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hdanton@sina.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; cv=none; t=1792836859; b=zvuPczwbavOKszWnIi0vOAbnCNq+t4BIv7fSUGzCZFnH+QOPk5eKKascHNLN0ZppJsKSNx 5aMvQuaOKTZ0Mv4hkw80+p7fm5JVPcBctWZU4RaNstHp5JTiW7ieb34lxotzHgdCKf7DAC b2HV4p+0Lh0HeOUi/lJDIMWPz0/bb1w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sina.com; s=201208; t=1792836858; bh=mHWFq5avGv6klXPzFSL6fYOnL7TOVnTa30eJ0p38zXo=; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID; b=Iu916t/gA1gco/GHCyHhJy8LlfimdqEhWr5OTrlOt1iJ6eLOm/8QtSocxlUAXVbZf SKeyYl9RH9FpbfzM1Ut8bL5kSZoFsXSR0fQ3CUDvPibSpiLrWxFOi2+/ERTcs5zqAc RjKaLU8Ogygi5gqtb3YCTyZEQl1sF9LXQM3q0Abo= X-SMAIL-HELO: localhost.localdomain Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain)([114.244.128.131]) by sina.com (10.54.253.33) with ESMTP id 6ADC84EE00006143; Sat, 24 Oct 2026 18:14:12 +0800 (CST) X-Sender: hdanton@sina.com X-Auth-ID: hdanton@sina.com X-SMAIL-MID: 8747526685218 X-SMAIL-UIID: ADCBD3CDD2B14D43A83493204A501CC4-20261024-181412-1 From: Hillf Danton To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton , Brian Geffon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/13] zram: split zcomp into separate R/W streams Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 18:14:00 +0800 Message-ID: <20261024101401.1035-1-hdanton@sina.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 400CF100006 X-Stat-Signature: 94wqw4n9e671tpbgynjjk9foya4e5zh8 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1792836856-716683 X-HE-Meta: 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 et5MlIQJ LvfsuzUz79h3Aobp/A1oHcdoJ4bJ61bLvXu52pcc28JUxfE+oj6YYXqLbTNhqxPWQVYvTPHcfqaWQlQl1mLNM+XzGlSO5NDVcOraFAM8szd5yzWM7RTV9rdCc8nh3wAzdsbzPUMy2Oku+1C6bcm5/V+DR3iZLdTqnUMk/4U6NO2PFFQorsoPL5GuUAdwIr/stteXsOh8cNUen88z9UT8Wvsl39d+SgcNXwBbSWZjRI3VGi6Syi4DLg2d9ajPVwX+s+kgQ40fwuokCS4kBDWLizl5x0nNkmpLxyKCm9jwBot3Ampj5Fa+7hbEZvw== Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 On Sat, 24 Oct 2026 14:48:32 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (26/10/23 19:40), Hillf Danton wrote: > [..] > > > writers vs readers 3 runs > > > > > > BASE+PE IOPS 1,271k avg 5.57us sd 1,393us p99.99 27.5us max 1,581,800us > > > IOPS 1,461k avg 3.43us sd 78us p99.99 23.9us max 227,015us > > > IOPS 1,444k avg 3.48us sd 222us p99.99 23.9us max 592,628us > > > PATCHED+PE IOPS 1,457k avg 3.32us sd 18us p99.99 27.5us max 5,620us > > > IOPS 1,464k avg 3.31us sd 17us p99.99 24.2us max 5,621us > > > IOPS 1,475k avg 3.29us sd 16us p99.99 26.5us max 5,620us > > BASE+PE looked noisy, so I sat down and tested properly (also tested > zstd and various compression levels). > Thanks again for sharing data. > (PE enabled for all tests) > > ######## zstd compression level 3 W-vs-R > BASE IOPS 1,154k avg 7.84us sd 444us max 697,634us > IOPS 881k avg 14.16us sd 2,242us max 1,387,000us > IOPS 704k avg 20.43us sd 3,499us max 2,058,300us > IOPS 563k avg 29.02us sd 3,910us max 1,649,800us > IOPS 626k avg 24.79us sd 4,013us max 2,085,800us > IOPS 976k avg 11.54us sd 1,518us max 1,165,800us > IOPS 1,178k avg 7.44us sd 22us max 3,103us > IOPS 1,120k avg 7.39us sd 21us max 7,222us > IOPS 522k avg 32.51us sd 4,311us max 1,598,300us > IOPS 581k avg 27.54us sd 3,626us max 1,448,600us > IOPS 1,160k avg 7.69us sd 352us max 702,099us > IOPS 1,169k avg 7.52us sd 129us max 281,428us > IOPS 954k avg 12.06us sd 1,705us max 1,545,600us > IOPS 1,029k avg 10.24us sd 1,156us max 976,065us > IOPS 1,169k avg 7.48us sd 24us max 4,305us > IOPS 1,177k avg 7.45us sd 53us max 118,777us > IOPS 579k avg 27.43us sd 3,661us max 1,615,800us > IOPS 1,169k avg 7.52us sd 115us max 228,074us > IOPS 1,110k avg 8.59us sd 985us max 1,288,000us > IOPS 1,177k avg 7.45us sd 29us max 72,245us > IOPS 580k avg 27.74us sd 3,755us max 1,507,000us > PATCHED IOPS 1,179k avg 7.40us sd 23us max 7,404us > IOPS 1,179k avg 7.41us sd 22us max 2,857us > IOPS 1,176k avg 7.40us sd 22us max 6,615us > IOPS 1,175k avg 7.44us sd 23us max 5,623us > IOPS 1,176k avg 7.42us sd 24us max 5,625us > IOPS 1,173k avg 7.42us sd 24us max 5,632us > IOPS 1,172k avg 7.41us sd 23us max 6,223us > IOPS 1,173k avg 7.40us sd 25us max 5,848us > IOPS 1,173k avg 7.40us sd 24us max 7,563us > IOPS 1,172k avg 7.42us sd 24us max 5,625us > IOPS 1,175k avg 7.42us sd 23us max 5,626us > IOPS 1,177k avg 7.42us sd 23us max 4,243us > IOPS 1,170k avg 7.46us sd 25us max 5,622us > IOPS 1,178k avg 7.40us sd 22us max 3,213us > IOPS 1,167k avg 7.43us sd 25us max 7,593us > IOPS 1,174k avg 7.44us sd 23us max 6,971us > IOPS 1,179k avg 7.38us sd 23us max 3,477us > IOPS 1,180k avg 7.39us sd 23us max 2,894us > IOPS 1,145k avg 7.37us sd 21us max 4,048us > IOPS 1,177k avg 7.38us sd 22us max 5,620us > IOPS 1,177k avg 7.40us sd 23us max 5,623us > > IOPS: BASE 932k (+-260k), PATCHED 1,174k (+-7k), 21 runs each. > significant difference at 95% confidence: PATCHED is 241k (25.9%) higher; 95% CI [+136k, +353k], Welch's t-test p = 0.000 > max latency: BASE 3.1..2,085.8 ms, PATCHED 2.9..7.6 ms > runs with max over 100 ms: BASE 17 of 21, PATCHED 0 of 21; over 1 s: BASE 11 of 21, PATCHED 0 of 21 > > ######## zstd compression level 12 W-vs-R > BASE IOPS 690k avg 21.53us sd 3,088us max 1,635,500us > IOPS 478k avg 36.51us sd 4,385us max 1,941,300us > IOPS 822k avg 16.13us sd 2,865us max 2,263,800us > IOPS 1,161k avg 7.73us sd 114us max 190,307us > IOPS 780k avg 17.56us sd 2,717us max 1,550,500us > IOPS 1,166k avg 7.66us sd 40us max 94,522us > IOPS 585k avg 27.51us sd 3,847us max 1,550,600us > IOPS 1,147k avg 7.97us sd 344us max 496,483us > IOPS 1,166k avg 7.64us sd 49us max 115,243us > IOPS 1,163k avg 7.66us sd 23us max 7,006us > IOPS 1,071k avg 9.42us sd 1,489us max 1,915,500us > IOPS 962k avg 11.88us sd 2,168us max 1,904,500us > IOPS 607k avg 26.05us sd 3,538us max 1,591,100us > IOPS 1,167k avg 7.63us sd 23us max 2,903us > IOPS 1,157k avg 7.78us sd 198us max 418,930us > IOPS 1,163k avg 7.66us sd 40us max 100,346us > IOPS 1,162k avg 7.70us sd 32us max 82,602us > IOPS 488k avg 35.43us sd 4,340us max 1,786,400us > IOPS 563k avg 28.85us sd 3,989us max 2,209,500us > IOPS 843k avg 15.43us sd 2,490us max 1,572,100us > IOPS 604k avg 26.30us sd 3,560us max 1,555,700us > PATCHED IOPS 1,166k avg 7.60us sd 23us max 5,623us > IOPS 1,169k avg 7.58us sd 23us max 5,629us > IOPS 1,157k avg 7.67us sd 27us max 5,639us > IOPS 1,166k avg 7.61us sd 24us max 5,644us > IOPS 1,160k avg 7.64us sd 26us max 7,543us > IOPS 1,167k avg 7.60us sd 24us max 7,514us > IOPS 1,160k avg 7.61us sd 25us max 6,643us > IOPS 1,162k avg 7.65us sd 25us max 7,315us > IOPS 1,161k avg 7.66us sd 24us max 6,237us > IOPS 1,158k avg 7.62us sd 27us max 7,688us > IOPS 1,167k avg 7.58us sd 24us max 5,637us > IOPS 1,165k avg 7.59us sd 24us max 7,098us > IOPS 948k avg 7.58us sd 23us max 7,808us > IOPS 1,166k avg 7.60us sd 24us max 5,621us > IOPS 1,166k avg 7.58us sd 24us max 5,672us > IOPS 1,162k avg 7.65us sd 25us max 6,824us > IOPS 1,165k avg 7.59us sd 24us max 7,078us > IOPS 1,168k avg 7.58us sd 23us max 6,191us > IOPS 1,170k avg 7.56us sd 22us max 2,851us > IOPS 1,171k avg 7.55us sd 22us max 2,834us > IOPS 1,166k avg 7.59us sd 24us max 5,627us > > IOPS: BASE 902k (+-269k), PATCHED 1,154k (+-47k), 21 runs each. > significant difference at 95% confidence: PATCHED is 252k (27.9%) higher; 95% CI [+142k, +367k], Welch's t-test p = 0.000 > max latency: BASE 2.9..2,263.8 ms, PATCHED 2.8..7.8 ms > runs with max over 100 ms: BASE 17 of 21, PATCHED 0 of 21; over 1 s: BASE 12 of 21, PATCHED 0 of 21 > > ######## lz4 W-vs-R > BASE IOPS 1,422k avg 3.84us sd 418us max 619,495us > IOPS 1,450k avg 3.57us sd 326us max 609,723us > IOPS 1,414k avg 3.92us sd 543us max 879,815us > IOPS 1,451k avg 3.56us sd 253us max 503,428us > IOPS 1,460k avg 3.40us sd 68us max 135,825us > IOPS 1,413k avg 3.31us sd 44us max 188,450us > IOPS 1,432k avg 3.73us sd 503us max 844,228us > IOPS 1,387k avg 4.20us sd 719us max 961,827us > IOPS 1,464k avg 3.38us sd 44us max 133,675us > IOPS 1,469k avg 3.38us sd 22us max 65,812us > IOPS 1,465k avg 3.40us sd 49us max 111,788us > IOPS 1,465k avg 3.39us sd 64us max 174,040us > IOPS 1,467k avg 3.38us sd 36us max 97,821us > IOPS 1,445k avg 3.63us sd 343us max 671,026us > IOPS 1,472k avg 3.35us sd 27us max 86,795us > IOPS 1,473k avg 3.33us sd 44us max 138,096us > IOPS 1,439k avg 3.71us sd 353us max 619,815us > IOPS 1,398k avg 3.36us sd 54us max 206,815us > IOPS 1,471k avg 3.36us sd 15us max 2,832us > IOPS 1,407k avg 4.02us sd 629us max 1,074,800us > IOPS 1,465k avg 3.40us sd 63us max 158,779us > PATCHED IOPS 1,471k avg 3.30us sd 15us max 6,946us > IOPS 1,473k avg 3.29us sd 16us max 5,618us > IOPS 1,474k avg 3.29us sd 15us max 5,615us > IOPS 1,473k avg 3.29us sd 15us max 5,625us > IOPS 1,440k avg 3.26us sd 13us max 2,829us > IOPS 1,456k avg 3.30us sd 15us max 5,623us > IOPS 1,476k avg 3.29us sd 15us max 2,835us > IOPS 1,464k avg 3.28us sd 16us max 6,063us > IOPS 1,468k avg 3.32us sd 19us max 6,692us > IOPS 1,465k avg 3.30us sd 17us max 6,834us > IOPS 1,468k avg 3.28us sd 16us max 7,268us > IOPS 1,463k avg 3.31us sd 17us max 6,480us > IOPS 1,454k avg 3.33us sd 20us max 8,418us > IOPS 1,452k avg 3.32us sd 19us max 5,621us > IOPS 1,477k avg 3.27us sd 14us max 2,834us > IOPS 1,468k avg 3.30us sd 16us max 5,617us > IOPS 1,475k avg 3.30us sd 16us max 3,884us > IOPS 1,475k avg 3.30us sd 16us max 5,692us > IOPS 1,471k avg 3.30us sd 15us max 5,616us > IOPS 1,473k avg 3.28us sd 16us max 7,014us > IOPS 1,475k avg 3.28us sd 15us max 5,616us > > IOPS: BASE 1,444k (+-27k), PATCHED 1,467k (+-10k), 21 runs each. > significant difference at 95% confidence: PATCHED is 23k (1.6%) higher; 95% CI [+11k, +35k], Welch's t-test p = 0.001 > max latency: BASE 2.8..1,074.8 ms, PATCHED 2.8..8.4 ms > runs with max over 100 ms: BASE 17 of 21, PATCHED 0 of 21; over 1 s: BASE 1 of 21, PATCHED 0 of 21 Lets see the data from another pov (feel free to disagree) -- in the android phone/car cockpit environment, the render frequence is required above 60HZ, IOW a frame rendered within 16ms, so what share of the 16ms does the IOPS account for after this patchset, for example when an app in background is brought foreground?