From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm/damon/vaddr: implement sz_filter_passed for migrate_{hot,cold} action
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 13:56:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261031205608.97086-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-192119@kernel.org>
On Sat, 31 Oct 2026 20:36:41 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Critical] mm/damon/vaddr: uninitialized priv.sz_filter_passed in damos_va_migrate()
> - [Medium] mm/damon/vaddr: double-counted sz_filter_passed in damos_va_migrate_pmd_entry()
> --
>
> commit 872d2945863aba3a6ac672128498f5d65dbc8d40
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
>
> mm/damon/vaddr: implement sz_filter_passed for migrate_{hot,cold} action
>
> This commit adds sz_filter_passed accounting to the DAMON virtual address
> space implementation of the migrate_hot and migrate_cold DAMOS actions by
> accumulating folio sizes in damos_va_migrate_pmd_entry().
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> > index c271b6d63c027..112095c2d53fd 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> > @@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ static bool damos_va_filter_out(struct damos *scheme, struct folio *folio,
> > struct damos_va_migrate_private {
> > struct list_head *migration_lists;
> > struct damos *scheme;
> > + unsigned long *sz_filter_passed;
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -840,6 +841,7 @@ static int damos_va_migrate_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> > struct damos_va_migrate_private *priv = walk->private;
> > struct list_head *migration_lists = priv->migration_lists;
> > struct damos *s = priv->scheme;
> > + unsigned long *sz_filter_passed = priv->sz_filter_passed;
>
> [Severity: Critical]
> Is priv.sz_filter_passed ever initialized before the page walk runs?
>
> In damos_va_migrate(), struct damos_va_migrate_private priv is declared on
> the stack without an initializer, and only priv.scheme and
> priv.migration_lists are set before calling damon_va_walk_page_range():
>
> mm/damon/vaddr.c:damos_va_migrate() {
> ...
> struct damos_va_migrate_private priv;
> ...
> priv.scheme = s;
> priv.migration_lists = kmalloc_objs(*priv.migration_lists, nr_dests);
> if (!priv.migration_lists)
> return 0;
>
> for (int i = 0; i < nr_dests; i++)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv.migration_lists[i]);
>
>
> mm = damon_get_mm(target);
> if (!mm)
> goto free_lists;
>
> damon_va_walk_page_range(mm, r->ar.start, r->ar.end, &walk_ops, &priv);
> ...
> }
>
> When damon_va_apply_scheme() invokes damos_va_migrate() for DAMOS_MIGRATE_HOT
> or DAMOS_MIGRATE_COLD and damos_va_migrate_pmd_entry() encounters a present
> folio that passes damos_va_filter_out(), won't *sz_filter_passed +=
> folio_size(folio) dereference an uninitialized stack pointer?
Nice finding. I will set the field in damos_va_migrate(), to sz_filter_passed
parameter it received.
>
> > struct damos_migrate_dests *dests = &s->migrate_dests;
> > struct folio *folio;
> > spinlock_t *ptl;
> > @@ -858,6 +860,7 @@ static int damos_va_migrate_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> > goto huge_out;
> > if (damos_va_filter_out(s, folio, walk->vma, addr, NULL, pmd))
> > goto huge_out;
> > + *sz_filter_passed += folio_size(folio);
> > damos_va_migrate_dests_add(folio, walk->vma, addr, dests,
> > migration_lists);
> > huge_out:
> > @@ -885,6 +888,7 @@ static int damos_va_migrate_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> > nr = folio_nr_pages(folio) - page_idx;
> > if (damos_va_filter_out(s, folio, walk->vma, addr, pte, NULL))
> > continue;
> > + *sz_filter_passed += folio_size(folio);
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Can *sz_filter_passed double-count a large folio that spans across multiple
> adjacent damon_region ranges?
>
> In damos_va_stat_pmd_entry(), the walk checks damos_va_invalid_folio(folio, s)
> and records s->last_applied = folio so that a PMD-mapped THP or PTE-mapped
> large folio overlapping more than one damon_region is only counted once per
> scheme application pass:
>
> mm/damon/vaddr.c:damos_va_stat_pmd_entry() {
> ...
> if (damos_va_invalid_folio(folio, s))
> goto huge_unlock;
>
> if (!damos_va_filter_out(s, folio, vma, addr, NULL, pmd))
> *sz_filter_passed += folio_size(folio);
> s->last_applied = folio;
> ...
> }
>
> In damos_va_migrate_pmd_entry(), s->last_applied is neither checked nor
> updated on either the THP path or the PTE loop path. If a large folio spans
> multiple regions and is not migrated during the first region's walk (for
> example, because folio_nid(folio) already matches the target node in
> damos_va_migrate_dests_add(), or because isolation or migration fails),
> walking the next overlapping damon_region will encounter the same folio and
> add the full folio_size(folio) to *sz_filter_passed again.
>
> Should damos_va_migrate_pmd_entry() also check damos_va_invalid_folio(folio,
> s) and update s->last_applied = folio?
Good finding. But this is a pre-existing issue. I think it is better to be
fixed first, before this patch, though. I will add the fix to this series, or
post it as a separate one before this series is merged.
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261031202614.96036-1-sj@kernel.org?part=3
>
Thanks,
SJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-31 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 20:26 [RFC PATCH 0/6] mm/damon: misc cleanup/improvements for core, vaddr, sysfs and tests SJ Park
2026-10-31 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] mm/damon/core: handle invalid target in damos_fix_stale_charge_pointers() SJ Park
2026-10-31 20:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-31 20:49 ` SJ Park
2026-10-31 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] mm/damon/vaddr: advance migration attempt in folio level for filter out SJ Park
2026-10-31 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm/damon/vaddr: implement sz_filter_passed for migrate_{hot,cold} action SJ Park
2026-10-31 20:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-31 20:56 ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-10-31 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: drop redundant and racy zero target_value check SJ Park
2026-10-31 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] selftests/damon/damos_apply_interval: remove unused variables SJ Park
2026-10-31 20:26 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] selftests/damon: remove unused imports of os and sys modules SJ Park
2026-10-31 20:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-31 20:57 ` SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261031205608.97086-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox