From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAC6606A330 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 09:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D2E346B05B1; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 04:03:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D05466B05B4; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 04:03:30 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C417F6B05B8; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 04:03:30 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FA96B05B1 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 04:03:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3174CA7DB7 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 09:03:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 85393219380.16.147524D Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76142100008 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 09:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de designates 213.95.11.211 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lst.de ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; cv=none; t=1793696608; b=PRsoUiGCo378f6CLg5nSCuywl61sfGw7jKpa4V//JN33KzLpNM7GS8s+QwLfqMiDW1WVzg e07Ge1PmSEnzTDVoRIiaxG3Ijy/DBMjj+lhK3b0yG9bkW4r5PeqkMHSZ9h4hmpM9G1jnQA VOg6ROEqEQ24yMUff4KRmzlzTvJ97QQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of hch@lst.de designates 213.95.11.211 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hch@lst.de; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lst.de ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1793696608; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GHGz850caSwjJKS3oE56h9NFkxUphg5/vIJAawh3jok=; b=M9yta2Xn34W8bhWP91KplYC5hdVLAemcQIHhuBTOlet6BXP5ZTFYNgPDoiiahhZSwgMRc+ j6QT5MGaR4MzENPiLllQ8QgoPUyzfRhuQQUBxOyAwVfe9gmIKMiOElHdidreimxhWE4pxT E+0GzqjJCScYKTeORbMi6QFIzrJBRhE= Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 5881F68B05; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 10:03:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 10:03:23 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christian Brauner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Al Viro , ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, exfat@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, ntfs@lists.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 33/34] xfs: allow remounting read-only after a shutdown Message-ID: <20261103090323.GA5314@lst.de> References: <20261029-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v2-0-2f44f64f0b66@kernel.org> <20261029-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v2-33-2f44f64f0b66@kernel.org> <20261103054155.GB1559@lst.de> <20261103-galgen-ehebruch-stehen-a967c14ce53e@brauner> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261103-galgen-ehebruch-stehen-a967c14ce53e@brauner> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Stat-Signature: ngtpd9x36insxfepmh48mmy5q7dhzdet X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 76142100008 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-HE-Tag: 1793696608-897062 X-HE-Meta: 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 NBU0bZNj s7bflgbK2uEQ/eOmkoStZ1N3r5TzjxnipThUwCMVGp5fotK8iXkmyZF71eWz7KlAQtoX7qq0+iXp10VfR2HxpIoge4i7MIOarJF+faeGxdNeCx18qMKGmke62bavb7IpLZ+8eOUL8sKv/m24= Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 09:41:58AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 06:41:55AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Btw, if my previous reply wasn't clear: please add the test for this > > to xfstests where they actually get run regularly and not the kernel > > selftests which for file systems are basically unused. > > > > Bonus points for having generic tests instead of purely file system > > specific ones. > > I can drop the tests from this series but xfstests for this will be a > follow-up. I'd much prefer to have one canonical place for the tests over having them in two places.