From: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: axelrasmussen@google.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
baoquan.he@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org, hui.zhu@linux.dev,
kasong@tencent.com, kunwu.chan@gmail.com, liam@infradead.org,
lianux.mm@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, liuxiang.277@bytedance.com,
lyugaofei@xiaomi.com, mhocko@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
qi.zheng@linux.dev, ridong.chen@linux.dev, rppt@kernel.org,
ryncsn@gmail.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, surenb@google.com,
wangzicheng@honor.com, weixugc@google.com, yuanchu@google.com,
zhangbo56@xiaomi.com, zhuhui@kylinos.cn,
sidchintamaneni@gmail.com, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v7 08/16] mm/mglru: lift youngest gen protection for higher priority
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 07:25:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111232603.9934-9-baohua@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111232603.9934-1-baohua@kernel.org>
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
The forced protection of younger generations contradicts the
goal of minimizing the I/O cost of reclaim. Under high memory
pressure, MGLRU can repeatedly trigger premature OOMs, while
the classic LRU does not.
The problem is that aging may fail to keep up with reclaim.
When this happens, reclaimers may all abort prematurely
because they see only empty generations or just two
generations remaining.
Proactive aging does not solve this problem either. The
number of threads performing proactive aging is limited,
while the number of concurrent reclaimers can be much
larger. This is a fundamental limitation of MGLRU. One
possible solution is to use an aging lock. However, the
aging lock introduces significant jitter under heavy memory
pressure and has been reported to cause noticeable lags
on Android.
Furthermore, the generation-based reclaim model can
conflict with the goal of swappiness, which is to minimize
I/O cost rather than blindly follow folio hotness.
The previous commit allowed reclaimers running at
non-default priorities to reclaim up to `lrugen->max_seq`,
while reclaimers at the default priority could reclaim only
up to `lrugen->min_seq`.
This patch further refines generation protection based on
reclaim priority. At the default priority, reclaimers can
reclaim generations down to `lrugen->min_seq - MIN_NR_GENS`.
As reclaim priority increases, reclaimers are progressively
allowed to reclaim younger generations.
With this graduated protection, premature OOMs are no
longer observed, while swappiness is also respected.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 88567002b7ef..fff7ee17eb0d 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4767,12 +4767,14 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(list));
/*
- * Respect the gen hotness distribution at low priority to avoid
- * aging and scan cost, but prefer to satisfy the reclaimers request
- * when under pressure to respect swappiness more and reduce IO cost.
+ * Respect hotness at default priority, and only reach into the
+ * newest generation when under severe pressure, so hot folios are
+ * not evicted as soon as priority is raised.
*/
if (sc->priority == DEF_PRIORITY)
- seq = lrugen->min_seq[type];
+ seq = lrugen->max_seq - MIN_NR_GENS;
+ else if (sc->priority > DEF_PRIORITY / 2)
+ seq = lrugen->max_seq - 1;
else
seq = lrugen->max_seq;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 23:25 [PATCH v7 00/16] mm: mglru: fix swappiness behavior Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 01/16] mm/mglru: report evictable sizes per type Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 02/16] mm/mglru: extract lruvec_populated_min_seq() helper Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 5:11 ` Barry Song
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 03/16] mm/mglru: reclaim from the oldest populated gen Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 04/16] mm/mglru: lift the forced protection of reclaimer Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 05/16] mm/mglru: skip zones above reclaim_idx instead of rotating them Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 6:36 ` Barry Song
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 06/16] mm/mglru: return for unavailable anon reclaim earlier Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 07/16] mm/mglru: balance anon and file scan budget by refault rate Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 23:25 ` Barry Song (Xiaomi) [this message]
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 09/16] mm/mglru: Avoid placing rejected folios below populated gen Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 10/16] mm/mglru: Run aging when pages are rare outside the youngest gen Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 5:47 ` Barry Song
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 11/16] mm/mglru: Run aging when one type has no populatable folios Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 23:25 ` [PATCH v7 12/16] mm/mglru: Restrict eviction accounting to eligible zones Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 9:24 ` Barry Song
2026-11-11 23:26 ` [PATCH v7 13/16] mm/mglru: Reduce LRU lock contention by shrinking folio batches in inc_min_seq Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-11 23:26 ` [PATCH v7 14/16] mm/mglru: Avoid prolonged anon reclaim with swappiness=200 Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 10:32 ` Barry Song
2026-11-11 23:26 ` [PATCH v7 15/16] mm/mglru: Make swappiness=1 file reclaim more aggressive Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 23:26 ` [PATCH v7 16/16] mm/mglru: Avoid scan anon while swapcache is low for GFP_NOIO allocation Barry Song (Xiaomi)
2026-11-12 5:01 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261111232603.9934-9-baohua@kernel.org \
--to=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hui.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=lianux.mm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuxiang.277@bytedance.com \
--cc=lyugaofei@xiaomi.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryncsn@gmail.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sidchintamaneni@gmail.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=wangzicheng@honor.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
--cc=zhuhui@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox