From: Salvatore Dipietro <dipiets@amazon.it>
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <dipietro.salvatore@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y 3/3] mm/page_alloc: avoid direct reclaim and compaction for costly __GFP_NORETRY allocations
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 11:06:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261113110611.2915381-4-dipiets@amazon.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113110611.2915381-1-dipiets@amazon.it>
[ Upstream commit 0e05a469c29400eb6e35448ce7318581688a1806 ]
Commit 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace")
introduced high-order folio allocations in the iomap buffered write path.
When memory is fragmented, each failed costly-order allocation enters
__alloc_pages_slowpath() which runs direct reclaim, direct compaction and
drain_all_pages(), causing a 0.38x throughput drop on PostgreSQL pgbench
(simple-update) with 1024 clients on a 96-vCPU arm64 system.
The root issue is that direct reclaim and direct compaction are too
expensive for hot allocation paths that have fallbacks to smaller
allocations. __filemap_get_folio_mpol() already marks higher-order
allocations with __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN, signalling that the caller
can handle failure. However, the page allocator still enters the full
blocking slowpath for costly orders with __GFP_NORETRY, which is
unnecessarily aggressive when the caller will simply retry at a lower
order.
For costly-order allocations with __GFP_NORETRY, clear
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM at the very start of the slowpath, before
can_direct_reclaim, can_compact and the nofail checks are evaluated. This
makes the entire slowpath treat the request as non-blocking: no direct
reclaim, no direct compaction and no drain_all_pages() IPI across every
CPU. Reclaim and compaction move to the background instead: kswapd is
still woken for reclaim, and it wakes kcompactd for defragmentation. The
system keeps its long-term health while the latency-critical direct
allocation path no longer stalls.
Allocations that also request __GFP_THISNODE are exempted. That flag
pairing identifies the local-node-first THP attempt issued by
alloc_pages_mpol() (mempolicy.c), which relies on direct compaction to
form transparent huge pages.
Clearing __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM makes these allocations reach the
!can_direct_reclaim bailout, which since commit 4c0ed883e051
("mm/page_alloc: fix defrag_mode for non-reclaimable allocations") drops
ALLOC_NOFRAGMENT and retries instead of failing when defrag_mode is on.
With vm.defrag_mode=1 a __GFP_NORETRY allocation could therefore succeed
by fragmenting another migratetype's pageblock. That is the wrong trade
for a caller that has already communicated it can handle failure and has a
cheap lower-order fallback, so exclude __GFP_NORETRY from the relaxation.
The exclusion is not restricted to costly orders: any __GFP_NORETRY caller
has said it can cope with failure, so failing is preferable to fragmenting
for all of them.
Test environment:
Hardware: AWS EC2 m8g.24xlarge (96 vCPU, arm64)
12x 1TB IO2 32000 IOPS RAID0 XFS
OS: AL2023
Kernel: v7.3-rc1
Database: PostgreSQL 18.4
Workload: pgbench simple-update, 1024 clients, 96 threads, 1200s
Results (average of 3 runs, TPS):
Config Avg TPS % vs baseline
v7.3-rc1 baseline (vm.defrag_mode=0) 58,602 -
v7.3-rc1 + this patch (vm.defrag_mode=0) 157,246 +168.3%
v7.3-rc1 baseline (vm.defrag_mode=1) 109,012 -
v7.3-rc1 + this patch (vm.defrag_mode=1) 157,778 +44.7%
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20261001082152.2879289-1-dipiets@amazon.it
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260403193535.9970-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#t [v1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260420161404.642-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260710143437.12379-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v3]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260904115629.3993331-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v4]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260911142102.2294202-1-dipiets@amazon.it/T/#u [v5]
Fixes: 5d8edfb900d5 ("iomap: Copy larger chunks from userspace")
Signed-off-by: Salvatore Dipietro <dipiets@amazon.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
Cc: Hazem Mohamed Abuelfotoh <abuehaze@amazon.com>
Cc: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>
Cc: Geoff Blake <blakgeof@amazon.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: <dipietro.salvatore@gmail.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>
Cc: <rvvandan@amazon.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: "Garg, Shivank" <shivankg@amd.com>
[ Salvatore: backport to 6.12.y: can_direct_reclaim is initialised at
its declaration here so assign it after clearing __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM.
Dropped the defrag_mode hunk: defrag_mode and 4c0ed883e051
("mm/page_alloc: fix defrag_mode for non-reclaimable allocations") do
not exist in this tree. ]
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 3ecd3fd76cf9..999ef2224add 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4278,7 +4278,7 @@ static inline struct page *
__alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
struct alloc_context *ac)
{
- bool can_direct_reclaim = gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
+ bool can_direct_reclaim;
bool can_compact = gfp_compaction_allowed(gfp_mask);
bool nofail = gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL;
const bool costly_order = order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER;
@@ -4293,6 +4293,16 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
unsigned int zonelist_iter_cookie;
int reserve_flags;
+ /*
+ * Costly __GFP_NORETRY callers have a cheap fallback, so don't stall
+ * them in reclaim or compaction. __GFP_THISNODE callers are exempt.
+ */
+ if (costly_order && (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY) &&
+ !(gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE))
+ gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
+
+ can_direct_reclaim = gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
+
if (unlikely(nofail)) {
/*
* We most definitely don't want callers attempting to
--
2.50.1
AMAZON DEVELOPMENT CENTER ITALY SRL, viale Monte Grappa 3/5, 20124 Milano, Italia, Registro delle Imprese di Milano Monza Brianza Lodi REA n. 2504859, Capitale Sociale: 10.000 EUR i.v., Cod. Fisc. e P.IVA 10100050961, Societa con Socio Unico
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-13 11:06 [PATCH 6.12.y 0/3] mm/page_alloc: fix iomap buffered write regression from 5d8edfb900d5 Salvatore Dipietro
2026-11-13 11:06 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/3] mm: page_alloc: do not give all non-blocking requests reserve access Salvatore Dipietro
2026-11-13 11:06 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/3] mm: page_alloc: remove ALLOC_NON_BLOCK from ALLOC_RESERVES Salvatore Dipietro
2026-11-13 11:06 ` Salvatore Dipietro [this message]
2026-11-13 19:09 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 0/3] mm/page_alloc: fix iomap buffered write regression from 5d8edfb900d5 Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261113110611.2915381-4-dipiets@amazon.it \
--to=dipiets@amazon.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipietro.salvatore@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox