From: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Harry Yoo" <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
"Yosry Ahmed" <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Meta kernel team" <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] cgroup: nmi safe css_rstat_updated
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:08:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <218e8b26-6b83-46a4-a57c-2346130a1597@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611221532.2513772-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
On 6/11/25 3:15 PM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> BPF programs can run in nmi context and may trigger memcg charged memory
> allocation in such context. Recently linux added support to nmi safe
> page allocation along with memcg charging of such allocations. However
> the kmalloc/slab support and corresponding memcg charging is still
> lacking,
>
> To provide nmi safe support for memcg charging for kmalloc/slab
> allocations, we need nmi safe memcg stats because for kernel memory
> charging and stats happen together. At the moment, memcg charging and
> memcg stats are nmi safe and the only thing which is not nmi safe is
> adding the cgroup to the per-cpu rstat update tree. i.e.
> css_rstat_updated() which this series is doing.
>
> This series made css_rstat_updated by using per-cpu lockless lists whose
> node in embedded in individual struct cgroup_subsys_state and the
> per-cpu head is placed in struct cgroup_subsys. For rstat users without
> cgroup_subsys, a global per-cpu lockless list head is created. The main
> challenge to use lockless in this scenario was the potential multiple
> inserters from the stacked context i.e. process, softirq, hardirq & nmi,
> potentially using the same per-cpu lockless node of a given
> cgroup_subsys_state. The normal lockless list does not protect against
> such scenario.
>
> The multiple stacked inserters using potentially same lockless node was
> resolved by making one of them succeed on reset the lockless node and the
> winner gets to insert the lockless node in the corresponding lockless
> list. The losers can assume the lockless list insertion will eventually
> succeed and continue their operation.
>
> Changelog since v2:
> - Add more clear explanation in cover letter and in the comment as
> suggested by Andrew, Michal & Tejun.
> - Use this_cpu_cmpxchg() instead of try_cmpxchg() as suggested by Tejun.
> - Remove the per-cpu ss locks as they are not needed anymore.
>
> Changelog since v1:
> - Based on Yosry's suggestion always use llist on the update side and
> create the update tree on flush side
>
> [v1] https://lore.kernel.org/cgroups/20250429061211.1295443-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev/
>
>
>
> Shakeel Butt (4):
> cgroup: support to enable nmi-safe css_rstat_updated
> cgroup: make css_rstat_updated nmi safe
> cgroup: remove per-cpu per-subsystem locks
> memcg: cgroup: call css_rstat_updated irrespective of in_nmi()
>
> include/linux/cgroup-defs.h | 11 +--
> include/trace/events/cgroup.h | 47 ----------
> kernel/cgroup/rstat.c | 169 +++++++++++++---------------------
> mm/memcontrol.c | 10 +-
> 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 163 deletions(-)
>
I tested this series by doing some updates/flushes on a cgroup hierarchy
with four levels. This tag can be added to the patches in this series.
Tested-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-16 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 22:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] cgroup: nmi safe css_rstat_updated Shakeel Butt
2025-06-11 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cgroup: support to enable nmi-safe css_rstat_updated Shakeel Butt
2025-06-11 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cgroup: make css_rstat_updated nmi safe Shakeel Butt
2025-06-11 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cgroup: remove per-cpu per-subsystem locks Shakeel Butt
2025-06-11 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] memcg: cgroup: call css_rstat_updated irrespective of in_nmi() Shakeel Butt
2025-06-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] cgroup: nmi safe css_rstat_updated Tejun Heo
2025-06-16 19:20 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-06-17 19:06 ` Tejun Heo
2025-06-17 19:38 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-06-16 20:08 ` JP Kobryn [this message]
2025-06-16 20:13 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=218e8b26-6b83-46a4-a57c-2346130a1597@gmail.com \
--to=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).