From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
selinux@vger.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: Do periodic rescheduling when freeing objects in kmem_free_up_q()
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:35:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2434d78c-b77c-571d-7add-e111f9d81485@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190321220035.GF7905@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 03/21/2019 06:00 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 05:45:12PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> If the freeing queue has many objects, freeing all of them consecutively
>> may cause soft lockup especially on a debug kernel. So kmem_free_up_q()
>> is modified to call cond_resched() if running in the process context.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> mm/slab_common.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
>> index dba20b4208f1..633a1d0f6d20 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>> @@ -1622,11 +1622,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmem_free_q_add);
>> * kmem_free_up_q - free all the objects in the freeing queue
>> * @head: freeing queue head
>> *
>> - * Free all the objects in the freeing queue.
>> + * Free all the objects in the freeing queue. The caller cannot hold any
>> + * non-sleeping locks.
>> */
>> void kmem_free_up_q(struct kmem_free_q_head *head)
>> {
>> struct kmem_free_q_node *node, *next;
>> + bool do_resched = !in_irq();
>> + int cnt = 0;
>>
>> for (node = head->first; node; node = next) {
>> next = node->next;
>> @@ -1634,6 +1637,12 @@ void kmem_free_up_q(struct kmem_free_q_head *head)
>> kmem_cache_free(node->cachep, node);
>> else
>> kfree(node);
>> + /*
>> + * Call cond_resched() every 256 objects freed when in
>> + * process context.
>> + */
>> + if (do_resched && !(++cnt & 0xff))
>> + cond_resched();
> Why not just: cond_resched() ?
cond_resched() calls ___might_sleep(). So it is prudent to check for
process context first to avoid erroneous message. Yes, I can call
cond_resched() after every free. I added the count just to not call it
too frequently.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-22 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-21 21:45 [PATCH 0/4] Signal: Fix hard lockup problem in flush_sigqueue() Waiman Long
2019-03-21 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: Implement kmem objects freeing queue Waiman Long
2019-03-22 17:47 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-21 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] signal: Make flush_sigqueue() use free_q to release memory Waiman Long
2019-03-22 1:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-22 11:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-22 16:10 ` Waiman Long
2019-03-22 17:50 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-22 18:12 ` Waiman Long
2019-03-22 19:39 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-22 19:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-25 14:15 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-25 15:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-25 16:16 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-26 13:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-26 13:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-21 21:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] signal: Add free_uid_to_q() Waiman Long
2019-03-21 21:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: Do periodic rescheduling when freeing objects in kmem_free_up_q() Waiman Long
2019-03-21 22:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-22 14:35 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2019-03-22 10:15 ` [PATCH 0/4] Signal: Fix hard lockup problem in flush_sigqueue() Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-22 11:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2434d78c-b77c-571d-7add-e111f9d81485@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).