From: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] memcg: change for softlimit.
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:12:26 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25afd2b84c65e7c2c8f2edde31c914f7.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090828150829.GR4889@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Balbir Singh wrote:
> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-08-29
> 00:06:23]:
>
>> Balbir Singh wrote:
>> > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-08-28
>> > 23:40:56]:
>> >
>> >> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> >> > Balbir Singh wrote:
>> >> >> But Bob and Mike might need to set soft limits between themselves.
>> if
>> >> >> soft limit of gold is 1G and bob needs to be close to 750M and
>> mike
>> >> >> 250M, how do we do it without supporting what we have today?
>> >> >>
>> >> > Don't use hierarchy or don't use softlimit.
>> >> > (I never think fine-grain soft limit can be useful.)
>> >> >
>> >> > Anyway, I have to modify unnecessary hacks for res_counter of
>> >> softlimit.
>> >> > plz allow modification. that's bad.
>> >> > I postpone RB-tree breakage problem, plz explain it or fix it by
>> >> yourself.
>> >> >
>> >> I changed my mind....per-zone RB-tree is also broken ;)
>> >>
>> >> Why I don't like broken system is a function which a user can't
>> >> know/calculate how-it-works is of no use in mission critical systems.
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to think how-to-fix it with better algorithm. Maybe RB-tree
>> >> is not a choice.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Soft limits are not meant for mission critical work :-) Soft limits is
>> > best effort and not a guaranteed resource allocation mechanism. I've
>> > mentioned in previous emails how we recover if we find the data is
>> > stale
>> >
>> yes. but can you explain how selection will be done to users ?
>> I can't.
>>
>
> From a user point, we get what we set, but the timelines can be a
> little longer.
>
I'll drop this patch, anyway. But will modify res_counter.
We have to reduce ops under lock after we see spinlock can explode
system time.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-28 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-28 4:20 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg: reduce lock conetion KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 4:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] memcg: change for softlimit KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 7:20 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-28 7:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 13:26 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-28 14:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 14:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 14:46 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-28 15:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 15:08 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-28 15:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2009-08-28 15:15 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-28 14:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-28 14:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 15:07 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-28 4:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] memcg: uncharge in batched manner KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 4:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 4:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 15:10 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-28 15:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 16:03 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-31 11:02 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-31 11:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-31 12:10 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-31 12:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-31 12:23 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-31 14:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 4:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] memcg: unmap, truncate, invalidate uncharege in batch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-31 11:02 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-28 4:27 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] memcg: per-cpu charge stock KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-31 11:10 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-31 12:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 4:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] memcg: drain per cpu stock KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-31 11:11 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-31 12:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-28 4:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg: reduce lock conetion Balbir Singh
2009-08-28 4:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25afd2b84c65e7c2c8f2edde31c914f7.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).