[PATCH v3 1/4] memblock tests: add simulation of physical memory with multiple NUMA nodes

[PATCH v3 1/4] memblock tests: add simulation of physical memory with multiple NUMA nodes

[Rebecca Mckeever]

Add functions setup_numa_memblock_generic() and setup_numa_memblock()
for setting up a memory layout with multiple NUMA nodes in a previously
allocated dummy physical memory. These functions can be used in place of
setup_memblock() in tests that need to simulate a NUMA system.

setup_numa_memblock_generic():
- allows for setting up a custom memory layout by specifying the amount
  of memory in each node, the number of nodes, and a factor that will be
  used to scale the memory in each node

setup_numa_memblock():
- allows for setting up a default memory layout

Introduce constant MEM_FACTOR, which is used to scale the default memory
layout based on MEM_SIZE.

Set CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT to 4 when building with NUMA=1 to allow for up to
16 NUMA nodes.

Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
---
 .../testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include |  2 +-
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c         | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h         |  9 ++++-
 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include b/tools/testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include
index aa6d82d56a23..998281723590 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/scripts/Makefile.include
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 # Simulate CONFIG_NUMA=y
 ifeq ($(NUMA), 1)
-	CFLAGS += -D CONFIG_NUMA
+	CFLAGS += -D CONFIG_NUMA -D CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=4
 endif
 
 # Use 32 bit physical addresses.
diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
index eec6901081af..15d8767dc70c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c
@@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ static const char * const help_opts[] = {
 
 static int verbose;
 
+static const phys_addr_t node_sizes[] = {
+	SZ_4K, SZ_1K, SZ_2K, SZ_2K, SZ_1K, SZ_1K, SZ_4K, SZ_1K
+};
+
 /* sets global variable returned by movable_node_is_enabled() stub */
 bool movable_node_enabled;
 
@@ -72,6 +76,40 @@ void setup_memblock(void)
 	fill_memblock();
 }
 
+/**
+ * setup_numa_memblock_generic:
+ * Set up a memory layout with multiple NUMA nodes in a previously allocated
+ * dummy physical memory.
+ * @nodes: an array containing the amount of memory in each node
+ * @node_cnt: the size of @nodes
+ * @factor: a factor that will be used to scale the memory in each node
+ *
+ * The nids will be set to 0 through node_cnt - 1.
+ */
+void setup_numa_memblock_generic(const phys_addr_t nodes[],
+				 int node_cnt, int factor)
+{
+	phys_addr_t base;
+	int flags;
+
+	reset_memblock_regions();
+	base = (phys_addr_t)memory_block.base;
+	flags = (movable_node_is_enabled()) ? MEMBLOCK_NONE : MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG;
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < node_cnt; i++) {
+		phys_addr_t size = factor * nodes[i];
+
+		memblock_add_node(base, size, i, flags);
+		base += size;
+	}
+	fill_memblock();
+}
+
+void setup_numa_memblock(void)
+{
+	setup_numa_memblock_generic(node_sizes, NUMA_NODES, MEM_FACTOR);
+}
+
 void dummy_physical_memory_init(void)
 {
 	memory_block.base = malloc(MEM_SIZE);
diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
index 78128e109a95..2a17453107dc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h
@@ -10,7 +10,11 @@
 #include <linux/printk.h>
 #include <../selftests/kselftest.h>
 
-#define MEM_SIZE SZ_16K
+#define MEM_SIZE		SZ_16K
+#define NUMA_NODES		8
+
+/* used to resize values that need to scale with MEM_SIZE */
+#define MEM_FACTOR		(MEM_SIZE / SZ_16K)
 
 enum test_flags {
 	/* No special request. */
@@ -102,6 +106,9 @@ struct region {
 void reset_memblock_regions(void);
 void reset_memblock_attributes(void);
 void setup_memblock(void);
+void setup_numa_memblock_generic(const phys_addr_t nodes[],
+				 int node_cnt, int factor);
+void setup_numa_memblock(void);
 void dummy_physical_memory_init(void);
 void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void);
 void parse_args(int argc, char **argv);
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid*

[Mike Rapoport]

On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:53:00AM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> Add tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()
> where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes.
> Additionally, all of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are
> run with a top-down allocation direction.
> 
> The tested scenarios are:
> 
> Range unrestricted:
> - region can be allocated in the specific node requested:
>       + there are no previously reserved regions
>       + the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space
> - the specific node requested cannot accommodate the request, but the
>   region can be allocated in a different node:
>       + there are no previously reserved regions, but node is too small
>       + the requested node is fully reserved
>       + the requested node is partially reserved and does not have
>         enough space
> 
> Range restricted:
> - region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping
>   min_addr:
>       + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the first
>         node is the requested node
>       + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
>         requested node ends before min_addr
> - region cannot be allocated in the specific node requested, but it can be
>   allocated in the requested range:
>       + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the
>         requested node ends before min_addr
>       + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the
>         requested node starts after max_addr
> - region cannot be allocated in the specific node requested, but it can be
>   allocated after dropping min_addr:
>       + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
>         second node is the requested node
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c | 702 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.h |  16 +
>  tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h        |  18 +
>  3 files changed, 725 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c
> index 32b3c1594fdd..e5ef93ea1ce5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c
> @@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ static int alloc_try_nid_bottom_up_cap_min_check(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/* Test case wrappers */
> +/* Test case wrappers for range tests */
>  static int alloc_try_nid_simple_check(void)
>  {
>  	test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__);
> @@ -1226,17 +1226,10 @@ static int alloc_try_nid_low_max_check(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int memblock_alloc_nid_checks_internal(int flags)
> +static int memblock_alloc_nid_range_checks(void)
>  {
> -	const char *func = get_memblock_alloc_try_nid_name(flags);
> -
> -	alloc_nid_test_flags = flags;
> -	prefix_reset();
> -	prefix_push(func);
> -	test_print("Running %s tests...\n", func);
> -
> -	reset_memblock_attributes();
> -	dummy_physical_memory_init();
> +	test_print("Running %s range tests...\n",
> +		   get_memblock_alloc_try_nid_name(alloc_nid_test_flags));
>  
>  	alloc_try_nid_simple_check();
>  	alloc_try_nid_misaligned_check();
> @@ -1253,6 +1246,693 @@ static int memblock_alloc_nid_checks_internal(int flags)
>  	alloc_try_nid_reserved_all_check();
>  	alloc_try_nid_low_max_check();
>  
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * A test that tries to allocate a memory region in a specific NUMA node that
> + * has enough memory to allocate a region of the requested size.
> + * Expect to allocate an aligned region at the end of the requested node.
> + */
> +static int alloc_try_nid_top_down_numa_simple_check(void)
> +{
> +	int nid_req = 3;
> +	struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
> +	struct memblock_region *req_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_req];
> +	void *allocated_ptr = NULL;
> +
> +	PREFIX_PUSH();
> +
> +	phys_addr_t size;
> +	phys_addr_t min_addr;
> +	phys_addr_t max_addr;
> +
> +	setup_numa_memblock();
> +
> +	ASSERT_LE(SZ_4, req_node->size);
> +	size = req_node->size / SZ_4;
> +	min_addr = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
> +	max_addr = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
> +
> +	allocated_ptr = run_memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
> +						   min_addr, max_addr, nid_req);
> +
> +	ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> +	assert_mem_content(allocated_ptr, size, alloc_nid_test_flags);
> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, size);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, region_end(req_node) - size);
> +	ASSERT_LE(req_node->base, new_rgn->base);
> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, size);
> +
> +	test_pass_pop();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * A test that tries to allocate a memory region in a specific NUMA node that
> + * does not have enough memory to allocate a region of the requested size:
> + *
> + *  |   +-----+          +------------------+     |
> + *  |   | req |          |     expected     |     |
> + *  +---+-----+----------+------------------+-----+
> + *
> + *  |                             +---------+     |
> + *  |                             |   rgn   |     |
> + *  +-----------------------------+---------+-----+
> + *
> + * Expect to allocate an aligned region at the end of the last node that has
> + * enough memory (in this case, nid = 6) after falling back to NUMA_NO_NODE.
> + */
> +static int alloc_try_nid_top_down_numa_small_node_check(void)
> +{
> +	int nid_req = 1;
> +	int nid_exp = 6;
> +	struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
> +	struct memblock_region *exp_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_exp];

AFAIU, having required and expected nodes here means very tight relation
between the NUMA layout used by setup_numa_memblock() and the test cases. 

I believe it would be clearer and less error prone if the relation were
more explicit. 

Can't say I have a great ideas how to achieve this, but maybe its worth
passing NUMA layout to setup_numa_memblock() every time, or setting the
requested and expected nid based on the NUMA layout, or maybe something
smarted than either of these.

> +	void *allocated_ptr = NULL;
> +
> +	PREFIX_PUSH();
> +
> +	phys_addr_t size;
> +	phys_addr_t min_addr;
> +	phys_addr_t max_addr;
> +
> +	setup_numa_memblock();
> +
> +	size = SZ_2K * MEM_FACTOR;
> +	min_addr = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
> +	max_addr = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
> +
> +	allocated_ptr = run_memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
> +						   min_addr, max_addr, nid_req);
> +
> +	ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> +	assert_mem_content(allocated_ptr, size, alloc_nid_test_flags);
> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, size);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, region_end(exp_node) - size);
> +	ASSERT_LE(exp_node->base, new_rgn->base);
> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, size);
> +
> +	test_pass_pop();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid*

[Rebecca Mckeever]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 11:59:42AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:53:00AM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> > Add tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()
> > where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes.
> > Additionally, all of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. These tests are
> > run with a top-down allocation direction.
> > 
> > The tested scenarios are:
> > 
> > Range unrestricted:
> > - region can be allocated in the specific node requested:
> >       + there are no previously reserved regions
> >       + the requested node is partially reserved but has enough space
> > - the specific node requested cannot accommodate the request, but the
> >   region can be allocated in a different node:
> >       + there are no previously reserved regions, but node is too small
> >       + the requested node is fully reserved
> >       + the requested node is partially reserved and does not have
> >         enough space
> > 
> > Range restricted:
> > - region can be allocated in the specific node requested after dropping
> >   min_addr:
> >       + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the first
> >         node is the requested node
> >       + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
> >         requested node ends before min_addr
> > - region cannot be allocated in the specific node requested, but it can be
> >   allocated in the requested range:
> >       + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the
> >         requested node ends before min_addr
> >       + range overlaps with multiple nodes along node boundaries, and the
> >         requested node starts after max_addr
> > - region cannot be allocated in the specific node requested, but it can be
> >   allocated after dropping min_addr:
> >       + range partially overlaps with two different nodes, where the
> >         second node is the requested node
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c | 702 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >  tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.h |  16 +
> >  tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h        |  18 +
> >  3 files changed, 725 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c
> > index 32b3c1594fdd..e5ef93ea1ce5 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c
> > @@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ static int alloc_try_nid_bottom_up_cap_min_check(void)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/* Test case wrappers */
> > +/* Test case wrappers for range tests */
> >  static int alloc_try_nid_simple_check(void)
> >  {
> >  	test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__);
> > @@ -1226,17 +1226,10 @@ static int alloc_try_nid_low_max_check(void)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int memblock_alloc_nid_checks_internal(int flags)
> > +static int memblock_alloc_nid_range_checks(void)
> >  {
> > -	const char *func = get_memblock_alloc_try_nid_name(flags);
> > -
> > -	alloc_nid_test_flags = flags;
> > -	prefix_reset();
> > -	prefix_push(func);
> > -	test_print("Running %s tests...\n", func);
> > -
> > -	reset_memblock_attributes();
> > -	dummy_physical_memory_init();
> > +	test_print("Running %s range tests...\n",
> > +		   get_memblock_alloc_try_nid_name(alloc_nid_test_flags));
> >  
> >  	alloc_try_nid_simple_check();
> >  	alloc_try_nid_misaligned_check();
> > @@ -1253,6 +1246,693 @@ static int memblock_alloc_nid_checks_internal(int flags)
> >  	alloc_try_nid_reserved_all_check();
> >  	alloc_try_nid_low_max_check();
> >  
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * A test that tries to allocate a memory region in a specific NUMA node that
> > + * has enough memory to allocate a region of the requested size.
> > + * Expect to allocate an aligned region at the end of the requested node.
> > + */
> > +static int alloc_try_nid_top_down_numa_simple_check(void)
> > +{
> > +	int nid_req = 3;
> > +	struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
> > +	struct memblock_region *req_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_req];
> > +	void *allocated_ptr = NULL;
> > +
> > +	PREFIX_PUSH();
> > +
> > +	phys_addr_t size;
> > +	phys_addr_t min_addr;
> > +	phys_addr_t max_addr;
> > +
> > +	setup_numa_memblock();
> > +
> > +	ASSERT_LE(SZ_4, req_node->size);
> > +	size = req_node->size / SZ_4;
> > +	min_addr = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
> > +	max_addr = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
> > +
> > +	allocated_ptr = run_memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
> > +						   min_addr, max_addr, nid_req);
> > +
> > +	ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > +	assert_mem_content(allocated_ptr, size, alloc_nid_test_flags);
> > +
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, size);
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, region_end(req_node) - size);
> > +	ASSERT_LE(req_node->base, new_rgn->base);
> > +
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1);
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, size);
> > +
> > +	test_pass_pop();
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * A test that tries to allocate a memory region in a specific NUMA node that
> > + * does not have enough memory to allocate a region of the requested size:
> > + *
> > + *  |   +-----+          +------------------+     |
> > + *  |   | req |          |     expected     |     |
> > + *  +---+-----+----------+------------------+-----+
> > + *
> > + *  |                             +---------+     |
> > + *  |                             |   rgn   |     |
> > + *  +-----------------------------+---------+-----+
> > + *
> > + * Expect to allocate an aligned region at the end of the last node that has
> > + * enough memory (in this case, nid = 6) after falling back to NUMA_NO_NODE.
> > + */
> > +static int alloc_try_nid_top_down_numa_small_node_check(void)
> > +{
> > +	int nid_req = 1;
> > +	int nid_exp = 6;
> > +	struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
> > +	struct memblock_region *exp_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_exp];
> 
> AFAIU, having required and expected nodes here means very tight relation
> between the NUMA layout used by setup_numa_memblock() and the test cases. 
> 
> I believe it would be clearer and less error prone if the relation were
> more explicit. 
> 
I agree.

> Can't say I have a great ideas how to achieve this, but maybe its worth
> passing NUMA layout to setup_numa_memblock() every time, or setting the
> requested and expected nid based on the NUMA layout, or maybe something
> smarted than either of these.
> 
I like the first option. I'll pass the NUMA layout if I can't think of a
better idea.

> > +	void *allocated_ptr = NULL;
> > +
> > +	PREFIX_PUSH();
> > +
> > +	phys_addr_t size;
> > +	phys_addr_t min_addr;
> > +	phys_addr_t max_addr;
> > +
> > +	setup_numa_memblock();
> > +
> > +	size = SZ_2K * MEM_FACTOR;
> > +	min_addr = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
> > +	max_addr = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
> > +
> > +	allocated_ptr = run_memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
> > +						   min_addr, max_addr, nid_req);
> > +
> > +	ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
> > +	assert_mem_content(allocated_ptr, size, alloc_nid_test_flags);
> > +
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, size);
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, region_end(exp_node) - size);
> > +	ASSERT_LE(exp_node->base, new_rgn->base);
> > +
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1);
> > +	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, size);
> > +
> > +	test_pass_pop();
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.

Thanks,
Rebecca