From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, richard.fellner@student.tugraz.at,
moritz.lipp@iaik.tugraz.at, daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at,
michael.schwarz@iaik.tugraz.at, luto@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, keescook@google.com,
hughd@google.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/kaiser: Flush the correct ASID in __native_flush_tlb_single()
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:21:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27729551-ecd6-e4e9-d214-4ab03d8008da@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129143526.GP3326@worktop>
On 11/29/2017 06:35 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> @@ -451,6 +474,9 @@ static inline void __native_flush_tlb_si
>> if (kern_asid(loaded_mm_asid) != user_asid(loaded_mm_asid))
>> invpcid_flush_one(user_asid(loaded_mm_asid), addr);
>> invpcid_flush_one(kern_asid(loaded_mm_asid), addr);
>> +
>> + /* Check that we are flushing the active ASID: */
>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(kern_asid(loaded_mm_asid) != cr3_asid());
>> }
>
> Can't we do this differently (after my recent patches)? It appears to me
> we can unconditionally do INVLPG to shoot down the kernel mapping, and
> then, depending on INVPCID support we can either use that to shoot down
> a single page or simply invalidate the entire user mapping.
Yes, that works. Also, as I think about it, INVLPG is a safer
(bug-resistant) instruction to use too. INVPCID _can_ get the current
(kernel) ASID wrong, as we saw. But INVLPG always uses the current one
and can't be wrong about flushing the *current* ASID.
I think Andy measured it to be faster than INVPCID too.
So, maybe we should just remove INVPCID's use entirely.
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 23 +++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 481d5094559e..9587722162ee 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -438,29 +438,20 @@ static inline void __native_flush_tlb_single(unsigned long addr)
> {
> u32 loaded_mm_asid = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm_asid);
>
> + asm volatile("invlpg (%0)" ::"r" (addr) : "memory");
> +
> + if (!kaiser_enabled)
> + return;
> +
> /*
> * Some platforms #GP if we call invpcid(type=1/2) before
> * CR4.PCIDE=1. Just call invpcid in the case we are called
> * early.
> */
> - if (!this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INVPCID_SINGLE)) {
> + if (!this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INVPCID_SINGLE))
> flush_user_asid(loaded_mm_asid);
> - asm volatile("invlpg (%0)" ::"r" (addr) : "memory");
> - return;
> - }
> - /* Flush the address out of both PCIDs. */
> - /*
> - * An optimization here might be to determine addresses
> - * that are only kernel-mapped and only flush the kernel
> - * ASID. But, userspace flushes are probably much more
> - * important performance-wise.
> - *
> - * Make sure to do only a single invpcid when KAISER is
> - * disabled and we have only a single ASID.
> - */
> - if (kern_asid(loaded_mm_asid) != user_asid(loaded_mm_asid))
> + else
> invpcid_flush_one(user_asid(loaded_mm_asid), addr);
> - invpcid_flush_one(kern_asid(loaded_mm_asid), addr);
> }
>
> static inline void __flush_tlb_all(void)
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 9:55 [PATCH] x86/mm/kaiser: Flush the correct ASID in __native_flush_tlb_single() Dave Hansen
2017-11-29 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-29 15:21 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2017-11-29 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27729551-ecd6-e4e9-d214-4ab03d8008da@linux.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.schwarz@iaik.tugraz.at \
--cc=moritz.lipp@iaik.tugraz.at \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.fellner@student.tugraz.at \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).