linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] mm: keep pages from unevictable mappings off the LRU lists
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:44:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262360903221744r6d275294gdc8ad3a12b8c5361@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237752784-1989-3-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>

Hmm,,

This patch is another thing unlike previous series patches.
Firstly, It looked good to me.

I think add_to_page_cache_lru have to become a fast path.
But, how often would ramfs and shmem function be called ?

I have a concern for this patch to add another burden.
so, we need any numbers for getting pros and cons.

Any thoughts ?

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> Check if the mapping is evictable when initially adding page cache
> pages to the LRU lists.  If that is not the case, add them to the
> unevictable list immediately instead of leaving it up to the reclaim
> code to move them there.
>
> This is useful for ramfs and locked shmem which mark whole mappings as
> unevictable and we know at fault time already that it is useless to
> try reclaiming these pages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.com>
> Cc: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
> ---
>  mm/filemap.c |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 23acefe..8574530 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -506,7 +506,9 @@ int add_to_page_cache_lru(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
>
>        ret = add_to_page_cache(page, mapping, offset, gfp_mask);
>        if (ret == 0) {
> -               if (page_is_file_cache(page))
> +               if (mapping_unevictable(mapping))
> +                       add_page_to_unevictable_list(page);
> +               else if (page_is_file_cache(page))
>                        lru_cache_add_file(page);
>                else
>                        lru_cache_add_active_anon(page);
> --
> 1.6.2.1.135.gde769
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>



-- 
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-22 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20090311153034.9389.19938.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
2009-03-11 22:03 ` [PATCH] NOMMU: Pages allocated to a ramfs inode's pagecache may get wrongly discarded Andrew Morton
2009-03-11 22:36   ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-12  0:02   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-12  0:35     ` Minchan Kim
2009-03-12  1:04       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-12  1:52         ` Minchan Kim
2009-03-12  1:56           ` Minchan Kim
2009-03-12  2:00           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-12  2:11             ` Minchan Kim
2009-03-12 12:19         ` Robin Getz
2009-03-12 17:55           ` [uClinux-dev] " Jamie Lokier
2009-03-13 17:33         ` [PATCH 0/2] Make the Unevictable LRU available on NOMMU David Howells
2009-03-13 17:33           ` [PATCH 1/2] NOMMU: There is no mlock() for NOMMU, so don't provide the bits David Howells
2009-03-14 11:17             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-13 17:33           ` [PATCH 2/2] NOMMU: Make CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU available when CONFIG_MMU=n David Howells
2009-03-14 11:17             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-14  0:27           ` [PATCH 0/2] Make the Unevictable LRU available on NOMMU Minchan Kim
2009-03-20 16:08             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-03-20 16:24             ` David Howells
2009-03-20 18:30               ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-03-21 10:20                 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-22 20:13                   ` [patch 1/3] mm: decouple unevictable lru from mmu Johannes Weiner
2009-03-22 23:46                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23  0:14                       ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-23 10:48                       ` David Howells
2009-03-22 20:13                   ` [patch 2/3] ramfs-nommu: use generic lru cache Johannes Weiner
2009-03-23  2:22                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-22 20:13                   ` [patch 3/3] mm: keep pages from unevictable mappings off the LRU lists Johannes Weiner
2009-03-23  0:44                     ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2009-03-23  2:21                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23  8:42                         ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-23  9:01                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23  9:23                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-26  0:48                               ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-23 10:40                   ` [patch 2/3] ramfs-nommu: use generic lru cache David Howells
2009-03-23 10:53                   ` [patch 3/3] mm: keep pages from unevictable mappings off the LRU lists David Howells
2009-03-26  0:01                     ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-26  8:56                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-26 10:36                         ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-23 20:07                   ` [PATCH 0/2] Make the Unevictable LRU available on NOMMU Lee Schermerhorn
2009-03-13 11:53       ` [PATCH] NOMMU: Pages allocated to a ramfs inode's pagecache may get wrongly discarded David Howells
2009-03-13 22:49         ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28c262360903221744r6d275294gdc8ad3a12b8c5361@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).