From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
apw@canonical.com, riel@redhat.com, mel@csn.ul.ie
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] remove wrong rotation at lumpy reclaim
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:20:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262360906110420g666df03cl49d008dd7a608ae6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c72e5b8de091845036fe2b5227168f5.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com>
2009/6/11 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> Minchan Kim wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:00 PM, KAMEZAWA
>> Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>
>>> At lumpy reclaim, a page failed to be taken by __isolate_lru_page() can
>>> be pushed back to "src" list by list_move(). But the page may not be
>>> from
>>> "src" list. And list_move() itself is unnecessary because the page is
>>> not on top of LRU. Then, leave it as it is if __isolate_lru_page()
>>> fails.
>>>
>>> This patch doesn't change the logic as "we should exit loop or not" and
>>> just fixes buggy list_move().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> ?mm/vmscan.c | ? ?9 +--------
>>> ?1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Index: lumpy-reclaim-trial/mm/vmscan.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- lumpy-reclaim-trial.orig/mm/vmscan.c
>>> +++ lumpy-reclaim-trial/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -936,18 +936,11 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(u
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* Check that we have not crossed a zone
>>> boundary. */
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (unlikely(page_zone_id(cursor_page) !=
>>> zone_id))
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?continue;
>>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? switch (__isolate_lru_page(cursor_page, mode,
>>> file)) {
>>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? case 0:
>>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (__isolate_lru_page(cursor_page, mode, file)
>>> == 0) {
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?list_move(&cursor_page->lru, dst);
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?nr_taken++;
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?scan++;
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
>>
>> break ??
>>
> good catch. I'll post updated one tomorrow.
> I'm very sorry ;(
Never mind. :)
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
--
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-11 7:55 [PATCH 0/3] misc fix around vmscan/isolate_lru_pages KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-11 8:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] remove wrong rotation at lumpy reclaim KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-11 8:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-11 9:18 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-11 11:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-11 11:20 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2009-06-11 22:52 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-11 15:06 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 8:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] check unevictable flag in lumy reclaim KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-11 8:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-11 8:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] check unevictable flag in lumy reclaim v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-11 8:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-11 9:37 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-11 9:39 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-11 11:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-11 11:59 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-11 12:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-11 22:55 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-11 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] check unevictable flag in lumy reclaim Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 8:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] memcg: fix LRU rotation of isolate_lru_pages with memcg KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28c262360906110420g666df03cl49d008dd7a608ae6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).