linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Question about pte_offset_map_lock
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:49:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262360912170649q30890dbay7892a15faf90135f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261036879.27920.11.camel@laptop>

Hi, Peter.

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 11:46 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> It may be a dumb question.
>>
>> As I read the code of pte_lock, I have a question.
>> Now, there is pte_offset_map_lock following as.
>>
>> #define pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp)     \
>> ({                                                      \
>>         spinlock_t *__ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);       \
>>         pte_t *__pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address);    \
>>         *(ptlp) = __ptl;                                \
>>         spin_lock(__ptl);                               \
>>         __pte;                                          \
>> })
>>
>> Why do we grab the lock after getting __pte?
>> Is it possible that __pte might be changed before we grab the spin_lock?
>>
>> Some codes in mm checks original pte by pte_same.
>> There are not-checked cases in proc. As looking over the cases,
>> It seems no problem. But in future, new user of pte_offset_map_lock
>> could mistake with that?
>
> I think currently mmap_sem serializes all that. Cases like faults that
> take the mmap_sem for reading sometimes need the pte validation to check
> if they didn't race with another fault etc.
>
> But since mmap_sem is held for reading the vma can't dissapear and the
> memory map is stable in the sense that the page tables will be present
> (or can be instantiated when needed), since munmap removes the
> pagetables for vmas.

Thanks for answering dumb question.

It means sometimes pte split lock depends on mmap_sem.
First of all, Shouldn't we remove this dependency by reordering spinlock(__ptl)
in pte_offset_map_lock  for range locking?

>
>



-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-17 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-17  2:46 Question about pte_offset_map_lock Minchan Kim
2009-12-17  8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 14:49   ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2009-12-17  9:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-12-17 15:02   ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28c262360912170649q30890dbay7892a15faf90135f@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).