From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Question about pte_offset_map_lock
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:49:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262360912170649q30890dbay7892a15faf90135f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261036879.27920.11.camel@laptop>
Hi, Peter.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 11:46 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> It may be a dumb question.
>>
>> As I read the code of pte_lock, I have a question.
>> Now, there is pte_offset_map_lock following as.
>>
>> #define pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp) \
>> ({ \
>> spinlock_t *__ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd); \
>> pte_t *__pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address); \
>> *(ptlp) = __ptl; \
>> spin_lock(__ptl); \
>> __pte; \
>> })
>>
>> Why do we grab the lock after getting __pte?
>> Is it possible that __pte might be changed before we grab the spin_lock?
>>
>> Some codes in mm checks original pte by pte_same.
>> There are not-checked cases in proc. As looking over the cases,
>> It seems no problem. But in future, new user of pte_offset_map_lock
>> could mistake with that?
>
> I think currently mmap_sem serializes all that. Cases like faults that
> take the mmap_sem for reading sometimes need the pte validation to check
> if they didn't race with another fault etc.
>
> But since mmap_sem is held for reading the vma can't dissapear and the
> memory map is stable in the sense that the page tables will be present
> (or can be instantiated when needed), since munmap removes the
> pagetables for vmas.
Thanks for answering dumb question.
It means sometimes pte split lock depends on mmap_sem.
First of all, Shouldn't we remove this dependency by reordering spinlock(__ptl)
in pte_offset_map_lock for range locking?
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 2:46 Question about pte_offset_map_lock Minchan Kim
2009-12-17 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 14:49 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2009-12-17 9:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-12-17 15:02 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28c262360912170649q30890dbay7892a15faf90135f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).