From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] memcg: fix oom killer kills a task in other cgroup
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 01:30:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262361002050830m7519f1c3y8860540708527fc0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100205093932.1dcdeb5f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi, Kame.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:39 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Please take this patch in different context with recent discussion.
> This is a quick-fix for a terrible bug.
>
> This patch itself is against mmotm but can be easily applied to mainline or
> stable tree, I think. (But I don't CC stable tree until I get ack.)
>
> ==
> Now, oom-killer kills process's chidlren at first. But this means
> a child in other cgroup can be killed. But it's not checked now.
>
> This patch fixes that.
>
> CC: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/oom_kill.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> Index: mmotm-2.6.33-Feb03/mm/oom_kill.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-2.6.33-Feb03.orig/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ mmotm-2.6.33-Feb03/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -459,6 +459,9 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_
> list_for_each_entry(c, &p->children, sibling) {
> if (c->mm == p->mm)
> continue;
> + /* Children may be in other cgroup */
> + if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(c, mem))
> + continue;
> if (!oom_kill_task(c))
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
I am worried about latency of OOM at worst case.
I mean that task_in_mem_cgroup calls task_lock of child.
We have used task_lock in many place.
Some place task_lock hold and then other locks.
For example, exit_fs held task_lock and try to hold write_lock of fs->lock.
If child already hold task_lock and wait to write_lock of fs->lock, OOM latency
is dependent of fs->lock.
I am not sure how many usecase is also dependent of other locks.
If it is not as is, we can't make sure in future.
So How about try_task_in_mem_cgroup?
If we can't hold task_lock, let's continue next child.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-05 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-05 0:39 [BUGFIX][PATCH] memcg: fix oom killer kills a task in other cgroup KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-05 0:57 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-05 16:30 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-02-09 0:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-09 0:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-09 1:24 ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-09 1:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-09 6:49 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-09 7:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-09 9:40 ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-09 9:55 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-09 10:18 ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-09 3:02 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH] memcg: fix oom killer kills a task in other cgroup v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-09 7:50 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-09 8:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-09 8:21 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-09 9:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-09 9:35 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-09 9:27 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28c262361002050830m7519f1c3y8860540708527fc0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).