From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]vmscan: handle underflow for get_scan_ratio
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:17:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262361003300317g6df68fc6m4385cfbe3e8a1b04@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
> Commit 84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 introduces a regression.
> With it, our tmpfs test always oom. The test has a lot of rotated anon
> pages and cause percent[0] zero. Actually the percent[0] is a very small
> value, but our calculation round it to zero. The commit makes vmscan
> completely skip anon pages and cause oops.
> An option is if percent[x] is zero in get_scan_ratio(), forces it
> to 1. See below patch.
> But the offending commit still changes behavior. Without the commit, we scan
> all pages if priority is zero, below patch doesn't fix this. Don't know if
> It's required to fix this too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 79c8098..d5cc34e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1604,6 +1604,18 @@ static void get_scan_ratio(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> /* Normalize to percentages */
> percent[0] = 100 * ap / (ap + fp + 1);
> percent[1] = 100 - percent[0];
> + /*
> + * if percent[x] is small and rounded to 0, this case doesn't mean we
> + * should skip scan. Give it at least 1% share.
> + */
> + if (percent[0] == 0) {
> + percent[0] = 1;
> + percent[1] = 99;
> + }
> + if (percent[1] == 0) {
> + percent[0] = 99;
> + percent[1] = 1;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
>
Yes. It made subtle change.
But we should not depend that change.
Current logic seems to be good and clear than old.
I think you were lucky at that time by not-good and not-clear logic.
BTW, How about this?
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 79c8098..f0df563 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1646,11 +1646,6 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
int file = is_file_lru(l);
unsigned long scan;
- if (percent[file] == 0) {
- nr[l] = 0;
- continue;
- }
-
scan = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, l);
if (priority) {
scan >>= priority;
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-30 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-30 5:53 [PATCH]vmscan: handle underflow for get_scan_ratio Shaohua Li
2010-03-30 6:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30 6:32 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-30 6:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30 6:53 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-30 7:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30 8:13 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-31 4:53 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-31 5:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-31 5:51 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-03-31 6:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-31 6:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-01 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-02 9:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 1:22 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 3:36 ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-31 5:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-02 6:50 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-02 9:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-02 9:24 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-04 14:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 1:25 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-06 1:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 1:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 2:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 2:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 2:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06 3:31 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 3:40 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-06 4:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 5:09 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-04 0:48 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 1:27 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-06 5:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06 5:36 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-09 6:51 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-09 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-09 21:25 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-13 1:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-13 2:42 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-13 7:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-13 8:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-14 1:27 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-15 3:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-12 1:57 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-31 5:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-03-30 10:17 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-03-30 10:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30 11:56 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28c262361003300317g6df68fc6m4385cfbe3e8a1b04@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).