linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]vmscan: handle underflow for get_scan_ratio
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:17:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28c262361003300317g6df68fc6m4385cfbe3e8a1b04@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
> Commit 84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26 introduces a regression.
> With it, our tmpfs test always oom. The test has a lot of rotated anon
> pages and cause percent[0] zero. Actually the percent[0] is a very small
> value, but our calculation round it to zero. The commit makes vmscan
> completely skip anon pages and cause oops.
> An option is if percent[x] is zero in get_scan_ratio(), forces it
> to 1. See below patch.
> But the offending commit still changes behavior. Without the commit, we scan
> all pages if priority is zero, below patch doesn't fix this. Don't know if
> It's required to fix this too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 79c8098..d5cc34e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1604,6 +1604,18 @@ static void get_scan_ratio(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>        /* Normalize to percentages */
>        percent[0] = 100 * ap / (ap + fp + 1);
>        percent[1] = 100 - percent[0];
> +       /*
> +        * if percent[x] is small and rounded to 0, this case doesn't mean we
> +        * should skip scan. Give it at least 1% share.
> +        */
> +       if (percent[0] == 0) {
> +               percent[0] = 1;
> +               percent[1] = 99;
> +       }
> +       if (percent[1] == 0) {
> +               percent[0] = 99;
> +               percent[1] = 1;
> +       }
>  }
>
>  /*
>

Yes. It made subtle change.
But we should not depend that change.
Current logic seems to be good and clear than old.
I think you were lucky at that time by not-good and not-clear logic.

BTW, How about this?

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 79c8098..f0df563 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1646,11 +1646,6 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
                int file = is_file_lru(l);
                unsigned long scan;

-               if (percent[file] == 0) {
-                       nr[l] = 0;
-                       continue;
-               }
-
                scan = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, l);
                if (priority) {
                        scan >>= priority;




-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-30 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-30  5:53 [PATCH]vmscan: handle underflow for get_scan_ratio Shaohua Li
2010-03-30  6:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30  6:32   ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-30  6:40     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30  6:53       ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-30  7:31         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30  8:13           ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-31  4:53   ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-31  5:38     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-31  5:51       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-03-31  6:00         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-31  6:03           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-01 22:16           ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-02  9:13             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06  1:22               ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06  3:36               ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-31  5:53       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-02  6:50         ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-02  9:14           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-02  9:24             ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-04 14:19               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06  1:25                 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-06  1:36                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06  1:50                   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06  2:06                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06  2:30                       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06  2:58                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-06  3:31                           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06  3:40                             ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-06  4:49                               ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06  5:09                                 ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-04  0:48           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06  1:27             ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-06  5:03           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-06  5:36             ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-09  6:51             ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-09 21:20               ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-09 21:25                 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-13  1:30                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-13  2:42                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-13  7:55                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-13  8:55                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-14  1:27                           ` Shaohua Li
2010-04-15  3:25                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-12  1:57                 ` Shaohua Li
2010-03-31  5:41     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-03-30 10:17 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-03-30 10:25   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-30 11:56 ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28c262361003300317g6df68fc6m4385cfbe3e8a1b04@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).