From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] iov_iter: Fix some checkpatch complaints in kunit tests
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 20:00:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d5db599144596bdc12533a366d5d2d8f375014e.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231115154946.3933808-2-dhowells@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 15:49 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Fix some checkpatch complaints in the new iov_iter kunit tests:
>
> (1) Some lines had eight spaces instead of a tab at the start.
>
> (2) Checkpatch doesn't like (void*)(unsigned long)0xnnnnnULL, so switch to
> using POISON_POINTER_DELTA plus an offset instead.
That's because checkpatch is fundamentally stupid and
that's a false positive.
> diff --git a/lib/kunit_iov_iter.c b/lib/kunit_iov_iter.c
[]
> @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static void __init iov_kunit_extract_pages_kvec(struct kunit *test)
> size_t offset0 = LONG_MAX;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pagelist); i++)
> - pagelist[i] = (void *)(unsigned long)0xaa55aa55aa55aa55ULL;
> + pagelist[i] = (void *)POISON_POINTER_DELTA + 0x5a;
I think the original is easier to understand
or would best be replaced by a single #define
without the addition.
> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static void __init iov_kunit_extract_pages_bvec(struct kunit *test)
> size_t offset0 = LONG_MAX;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pagelist); i++)
> - pagelist[i] = (void *)(unsigned long)0xaa55aa55aa55aa55ULL;
> + pagelist[i] = (void *)POISON_POINTER_DELTA + 0x5a;
etc...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-16 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-15 15:49 [PATCH v3 00/10] iov_iter: kunit: Cleanup, abstraction and more tests David Howells
2023-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] iov_iter: Fix some checkpatch complaints in kunit tests David Howells
2023-11-16 4:00 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2023-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] iov_iter: Consolidate some of the repeated code into helpers David Howells
2023-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] iov_iter: Consolidate the test vector struct in the kunit tests David Howells
2023-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] iov_iter: Consolidate bvec pattern checking David Howells
2023-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] iov_iter: Create a function to prepare userspace VM for UBUF/IOVEC tests David Howells
2023-11-15 16:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-15 16:39 ` David Howells
2023-11-15 16:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] iov_iter: Add copy kunit tests for ITER_UBUF and ITER_IOVEC David Howells
2023-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] iov_iter: Add extract " David Howells
2023-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] iov_iter: Add benchmarking kunit tests David Howells
2023-11-15 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] iov_iter: Add kunit to benchmark decanting of xarray to bvec David Howells
2023-11-15 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] iov_iter: Add benchmarking kunit tests for UBUF/IOVEC David Howells
2023-11-15 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] iov_iter: kunit: Cleanup, abstraction and more tests Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-09-22 11:30 David Howells
2023-09-22 11:30 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] iov_iter: Fix some checkpatch complaints in kunit tests David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2d5db599144596bdc12533a366d5d2d8f375014e.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox