From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id e21so6871505qba.0 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:11:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2f11576a0802091011r61da1d67q3b7b114f495d780a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:11:22 +0900 From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3 In-Reply-To: <1202499913.5346.60.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080202180536.F494.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <1202149243.5028.61.camel@localhost> <20080205163406.270B.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <1202499913.5346.60.camel@localhost> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Paul Jackson , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman , linux-mm , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Eric Whitney List-ID: Hi Lee-san looks good for me. I'll test about the head of week and report it by another mail. Thanks! > Was "Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doesn't > works on memoryless node." > > [Aside: I noticed there were two slightly different distributions for > this topic. I've unified the distribution lists w/o dropping anyone, I > think. Apologies if you'd rather have been dropped...] > > Here's V3 of the patch, accomodating Kosaki Motohiro's suggestion for > folding contextualize_policy() into mpol_check_policy() [because my > "was_empty" argument "was ugly" ;-)]. It does seem to clean up the > code. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org