From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so1589275wra.26 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 09:01:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2f11576a0803020901n715fda8esbfc0172f5a15ae3c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 02:01:40 +0900 From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] mm: BadRAM support for broken memory In-Reply-To: <20080302134221.GA25196@phantom.vanrein.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080302134221.GA25196@phantom.vanrein.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Rick van Rein Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi in general, Agreed with we need bad memory treatness. > +#define PG_badram 20 /* BadRam page */ some architecture use PG_reserved for treat bad memory. Why do you want introduce new page flag? for show_mem() improvement? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org