From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D8D2CD98C5 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 15:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7E0796B0096; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 11:55:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 792DB6B0098; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 11:55:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6A8856B0099; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 11:55:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557EB6B0096 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 11:55:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DB81A0666 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 15:55:27 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84860823894.23.AC022F1 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org (tor.source.kernel.org [172.105.4.254]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7582EC0009 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 15:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20260515 header.b=hHxclXE6; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of pratyush@kernel.org designates 172.105.4.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pratyush@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1781020525; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=ZbzCK1HDZ6UQM0wxmODd5gt3PhXikPzvdF+pmduOMD4=; b=KYHiGzTUDuM9bSrFnHWFyR5cuKajiCAkOUxDMdDhwd+qpYKnmMJB84RoN+SSVi9WNxibIY +WVUtORl4W4X+XF80VWreLnuZ0TK0exrFcUZMCqX8RlaIIgMCO4pgsM/0MrEMg8dIXi0VR ENYbcKzwByrnsoRqfTsiO1bvzLIWx6U= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20260515 header.b=hHxclXE6; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of pratyush@kernel.org designates 172.105.4.254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pratyush@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; cv=none; t=1781020525; b=BcheHvAXAaboBdmZ98T5LX08jLzkHZAv8KZeYjCxPnvIa6DxI9TmmtgqIU6BrDqTnLEcMI mpQ5jhZmW1t+4xt2re7fvmGy+HjhR0oEZ6M+EphF8Ms0vr7NjrRg5l2agddWY6niB721Bg fb4YXakoinwiRm6E0PYmqOr8+gXT8qU= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0869A60234; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 15:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ACA31F00893; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 15:55:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781020524; bh=ZbzCK1HDZ6UQM0wxmODd5gt3PhXikPzvdF+pmduOMD4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=hHxclXE61EFMwxcZZ4ijcKdmZQrXuHFpw/8CotX43ijEM7cIj8eoOWyMjiEpkQs9z 8s+wxGuYEcL7qIWh2PuqYhtJ6sViwxkpG7ntvpgu2+iqzL+PKZjbAqlVXkOA9EB3JM RXOop81ORKUegIcXQm2xuJUzqk3dxVGZP+7fF5udRvb4yV+c/UJA45i5eC40GfmVU7 DatfDIxUwYt+satO6eHDulTBroOMM0WfB/mOWLojxGfwT4BDyImoIC9N801qlUZf0D TE0DXAd/e0ONGvRHfe6p72N+i7y/1poMqooU5WCKSx9FexX1x+6j+rR0jpJR23Q5/I ZOJgu/CycSMNg== From: Pratyush Yadav To: George Guo Cc: Mike Rapoport , Huacai Chen , Pasha Tatashin , Pratyush Yadav , Shuah Khan , WANG Xuerui , Alexander Graf , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, George Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] LoongArch: add KHO support and selftests In-Reply-To: <20260609143945.512688-1-dongtai.guo@linux.dev> (George Guo's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2026 22:39:45 +0800") References: <20260601092823.110362-1-dongtai.guo@linux.dev> <20260609143945.512688-1-dongtai.guo@linux.dev> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:55:21 +0200 Message-ID: <2vxzbjdjso7q.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7582EC0009 X-Stat-Signature: 3pzwpyncd1u53iy9uwi8xeefye871gnr X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1781020525-245459 X-HE-Meta: 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 QlN42Gjq u7YQjYgyCpwLK1Almgpatbxxf0cJNOa1vVrZPEOXbjFkFqshR5SpttFIn/2LHQnBXU+0TUOJdWhfFy3qSXTZjcm4swQTR4b+8SKH+HhPxvBgb0Hx4Y1Ae10f/O4OE+dXLVgMRuZQRb7QqVsf1qqOdbfcwdvMxta7Y0Fmeh3t5PelAVoX02gk0ShNIO43l0Qsgqh3ilZituIyuRVPzc9pHlwfgfg== Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, Jun 09 2026, George Guo wrote: > Hi Mike, Huacai, > > Gentle ping on this v3. In the v2 review you mentioned you'd wait for > v3 for a more detailed look -- v3 addresses both points (folded the two > selftest patches into one, and replaced the LoongArch-specific kill > loop with timeout(1), with the timeout value set per-arch in the conf). > > No rush, just making sure it didn't slip through the cracks. Happy to > spin a rebase if it's gone stale. It is on my review list, and I hope to get to it soon. But no promises unfortunately. -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav